Theme: Constitutional Order

  • Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?” (yes but it’s fixable) Right n

    Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?”
    (yes but it’s fixable)
    Right now it sure does. However, that’s due to “positive law” that violated natural law, the common law, concurrent legislation, and all evidence across all of human history. if we are going to permit divorces then we have to restore liability for interference in a marriage, and end no-fault divorce, child support, and alimony. And AFAIK that will all end this decade.

    Reply addressees: @Chris29819258


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 18:05:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637878159646261249

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637869080366440450

  • Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?” (yes but it’s fixable) Right n

    Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?”
    (yes but it’s fixable)
    Right now it sure does. However, that’s due to “positive law” that violated natural law, the common law, concurrent legislation, and all evidence across all of human history. if we are going to permit divorces then we have to restore liability for interference in a marriage, and end no-fault divorce, child support, and alimony. And AFAIK that will all end this decade.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 18:05:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637878159738646528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637869080366440450

  • Let Me Help You: Given: PRIORITY OF COMMON INTEREST: . . . . . . . . . . . . Chr

    Let Me Help You:

    Given:
    PRIORITY OF COMMON INTEREST:
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Christian Nationalist
    . . . . . . . . . . . . .(Religious, Clerical)

    Civic Nationalist . . . . . . . . . EthnoNationalist
    (Political, Legal). . . . . . . . . .(Genetic, Cultural)

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cosmopolitan
    . . . . . . . . . . . . (Global, Ideological)

    -vs-

    And Given:
    DECISION MAKING BIAS:
    Collectivism < – > Reciprocity <-> Authority

    And Given:
    DECISION MAKING ORGANIZATION:
    … Communism -> Socialism
    … … French Socialism -> Fascism
    … … … Classical Liberalism ->Democratic Socialism
    … … … … Libertarianism -> Libertinism
    … … … Constitutional Monarchism
    … … Christian Monarchism -> Strong Monarchy
    … Authoritarianism – Despotism

    QUESTION:
    1) What is possible to exist?
    2) What generates demand for authority vs what generates demand for sovereignty (freedom, liberty)?
    3) What is optimum for a government?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 16:23:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637852256161738753

  • Let Me Help You: Given: PRIORITY OF COMMON INTEREST: . . . . . . . . . . . . Chr

    Let Me Help You:

    Given:
    PRIORITY OF COMMON INTEREST:
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Christian Nationalist
    . . . . . . . . . . . . .(Religious, Clerical)

    Civic Nationalist . . . . . . . . . EthnoNationalist
    (Political, Legal). . . . . . . . . .(Genetic, Cultural)

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cosmopolitan
    . . . . . . . . . . . . (Global, Ideological)

    -vs-

    And Given:
    DECISION MAKING BIAS:
    Collectivism < – > Reciprocity <-> Authority

    And Given:
    DECISION MAKING ORGANIZATION:
    … Communism -> Socialism
    … … French Socialism -> Fascism
    … … … Classical Liberalism ->Democratic Socialism
    … … … … Libertarianism -> Libertinism
    … … … Constitutional Monarchism
    … … Christian Monarchism -> Strong Monarchy
    … Authoritarianism – Despotism

    QUESTION:
    1) What is possible to exist?
    2) What generates demand for authority vs what generates demand for sovereignty (freedom, liberty)?
    3) What is optimum for a government?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 16:23:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637852256279076864

  • RT @ScottAdamsSays: Can someone explain the “no bail” idea and the continued imp

    RT @ScottAdamsSays: Can someone explain the “no bail” idea and the continued imprisonment of the non-violent J6ers in a way that doesn’t ma…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-18 21:08:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637199402774286341

  • WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN? Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, an

    WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN?
    Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, anti-national, anti-rule-of-law, anti-meritocracy, anti-reciprocity, anti-proportionality, anti-male, anti-truth.

    In other words, it’s just the newest term in the Abrahamic to Marxist Evolution of rebellion by sedition:

    The cult of envy and hatred: #marxism(class) > #neomarxism(culture) > #postmodernism (truth) > #feminism (sex) > #woke (race) > hatred sequence.

    #WokeIsHate

    Reply addressees: @moreywrites @bethanyshondark


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:00:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636110242013388801

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636109112151887880

  • WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN? Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, an

    WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN?
    Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, anti-national, anti-rule-of-law, anti-meritocracy, anti-reciprocity, anti-proportionality, anti-male, anti-truth.

    In other words, it’s just the newest term in the Abrahamic to Marxist Evolution of rebellion by sedition:

    The cult of envy and hatred: #marxism(class) > #neomarxism(culture) > #postmodernism (truth) > #feminism (sex) > #woke (race) > hatred sequence.

    #WokeIsHate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:00:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636110242135040006

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636109112151887880

  • REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND I do my work for a

    REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND
    I do my work for all of mankind. Anglo aristocracy worked on me. I care about all humans. Christianity worked on me. It’s OK to call me names for my classism and culturism – because I am correct in my criticism of those that vary from natural law, and how much they vary from natural law, because their variance from natural law is harmful to the humans in those cultures and classes.

    Sure, I would prefer to live in a pre-woke world of homogenous white Christian northern Europeans, because we are the only people other than the Japanese and Koreans capable of the high-trust society we created over the millennia. And the calm, joy, and commons that result. I remember when we were ‘all roughly the same’ and it was a far better social and political world to be in than the world of division created by the cultural, sex, truth, and race Marxists in pursuit of generating demand for authority that only they can (of course) provide.

    But living that way – for me. That’s just a preference. We do not need to have the same preferences. We only need a market for governments that satisfy different preferences.

    Small, ethnically homogenous, secular humanist, natural law, rule of law, republican government with an independent judiciary of that law, a monarchy as judge of last resort, and houses for the classes for the negotiation of the production of commons, a universal militia to insure the above, and a mixed economy where state, semi-private, and private institutions serve the time frames of production they are capable of without the rise of corruption either private or public is simply the minimum variation from the laws of the universe that is humanly possible. Such a polity can revert to authority in war, reciprocity in peace, and redistribution in windfall, with the minimum power distance, inequality, political competition and friction, and the greatest rate of innovation and adaptation possible for man. An alliance of these states into federations provides the scale necessary for defense, insurance, and trade policy, for the benefit of all at the expense of none.

    The only route to get there is a homogenous population, universal military service, evolving a court of natural law, evolving a government of natural law, and from it a population capable of a majority middle class, and as a result the surpluses a majority middle class produces, and the redistribution made possible by the surpluses. There is no shortcut to producing the trust required to convert clan and tribe and class into a homogenous polity. Either you follow this evolutionary path or you hired Europeans to run the judiciary until you do. Because we’re the only people who do it by our nature and culture and traditions alone.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    The cult of hatred:#marxism(class) #neomarxism(culture) #postmodernism (truth) #feminism (sex) #woke (race)

    #WokeIsHate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:48:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636076848072237059

  • REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND I do my work for a

    REPEATING: THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS POSSIBLE FOR ALL MANKIND
    I do my work for all of mankind. Anglo aristocracy worked on me. I care about all humans. Christianity worked on me. It’s OK to call me names for my classism and culturism – because I am correct in my criticism of those that vary from natural law, and how much they vary from natural law, because their variance from natural law is harmful to the humans in those cultures and classes.

    Sure, I would prefer to live in a pre-woke world of homogenous white Christian northern Europeans, because we are the only people other than the Japanese and Koreans capable of the high-trust society we created over the millennia. And the calm, joy, and commons that result. I remember when we were ‘all roughly the same’ and it was a far better social and political world to be in than the world of division created by the cultural, sex, truth, and race Marxists in pursuit of generating demand for authority that only they can (of course) provide.

    But living that way – for me. That’s just a preference. We do not need to have the same preferences. We only need a market for governments that satisfy different preferences.

    Small, ethnically homogenous, secular humanist, natural law, rule of law, republican government with an independent judiciary of that law, a monarchy as judge of last resort, and houses for the classes for the negotiation of the production of commons, a universal militia to insure the above, and a mixed economy where state, semi-private, and private institutions serve the time frames of production they are capable of without the rise of corruption either private or public is simply the minimum variation from the laws of the universe that is humanly possible. Such a polity can revert to authority in war, reciprocity in peace, and redistribution in windfall, with the minimum power distance, inequality, political competition and friction, and the greatest rate of innovation and adaptation possible for man. An alliance of these states into federations provides the scale necessary for defense, insurance, and trade policy, for the benefit of all at the expense of none.

    The only route to get there is a homogenous population, universal military service, evolving a court of natural law, evolving a government of natural law, and from it a population capable of a majority middle class, and as a result the surpluses a majority middle class produces, and the redistribution made possible by the surpluses. There is no shortcut to producing the trust required to convert clan and tribe and class into a homogenous polity. Either you follow this evolutionary path or you hired Europeans to run the judiciary until you do. Because we’re the only people who do it by our nature and culture and traditions alone.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    The cult of hatred:#marxism(class) #neomarxism(culture) #postmodernism (truth) #feminism (sex) #woke (race)

    #WokeIsHate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:48:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636076848420474894

  • @KonstantinKisin, (all) Progressive and Conservative are intentional framings, j

    @KonstantinKisin, (all)

    Progressive and Conservative are intentional framings, just like capitalism and socialism: deception by suggestion.

    The question is instead, whether we pursue empiricism and consistency with the laws of universe and of human be havior (truth), or idealism and inconsistency with the laws of the universe and of human behavior (fraud).

    As far as I know the hate-label ‘whiteness’, equals the european group strategy of dependence on evidence, science, reason and the natural law of cooperation (reciprocity).

    As far as I know, the primary if not exclusive technique of the left, whether the abrahamic sequence of religions in the ancient world or teh marxist-to-woke squence in the modern world, relies on the technique of ‘baiting into hazard’ by the ‘false promise’ (fraud) that it is possible to escape (evade) the five laws of the universe:
    1) endless physical scarcity
    2) endless human acquisitiveness, amorality, practicality and status seeking
    3) endless evolutionary mutation, load, selection
    4) endless increases in concepts vocabulary and logic to explain all three.
    5) and the endless necessity of continuous increases in per capital transformation of energy to maintain evolution in a condition of prosperity.

    The only solution to scaling human cooperation and the benefits of doing so is only possible by maximizing incentives for individual action in pursuit of self determination by self determined means by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty to the commons.

    But our overwhelming amorality in the abscence of norms, traditions, laws, and institutions, is continuously challenged – baited into hazard – by nothing more than fortune tellers, priests, and public ‘intellectuals’.

    Humans operate at the maximum amorality that they can get away with. That’s as necessary a law of nature as is entropy.

    And to make it worse, male acquisition of capital and responsibility in pursuit of status, is the opposite of female acquistion of consumption and irresponsibility in pursuit of status. And this differences is playing out at global scale in every nation that has attempted equality under democracy, because of our experiment with the universal franchise under the false promise of endless economic growth. (Which is reversing with our decliing rates of reproduction.)

    To prevent another abrahamic or marxist dark age, we need to end the ability to sell false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe especially under democxratic participatory government. Because that’s what cults and religions do: generate demand for authority to destroy demonstrated competency with flase promises and credentialism.

    Because they lie, demanding social construction of falsehoods for membership to produce cultural warfare, to undermine meritocracy wherever it exists.

    We know the laws of civilization. The british discovered them with the invention of the modern constitutional rule of law state, by the natural law of cooperation, and the ancient european tradition of sovereignty, responsibility, and tort.

    No more lies.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 22:10:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635402951362592769

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635346961363787776