Theme: Constitutional Order

  • The 14th Amendment debt clause DOES NOT MEAN WHAT YOU THINK IT DOES. And the Sup

    The 14th Amendment debt clause DOES NOT MEAN WHAT YOU THINK IT DOES. And the Supremes will absolutely positively overturn any attempt to pretend it means other than what it was intended to mean. It means that a debt incurred by the USA prohibits the federal government from denying debts incurred, particularly in the civil war. It says nothing about paying them or debt ceilings. It merely prevents court or legislative action to escape a debt incurred by the federal government.

    –“The primary purpose of this provision was to ensure the federal government’s commitment to repaying the debts incurred during the Civil War while simultaneously preventing the payment of any debts or claims associated with the Confederacy or slaveholders. By doing so, it helped to protect the financial stability of the United States and prevent any political or legal attempts to undermine the Union’s efforts during the Civil War. In summary, Section 4 of the 14th Amendment aimed to reaffirm the legitimacy of the public debt incurred by the United States during the Civil War, deny any financial claims from the Confederacy or slaveholders, and strengthen the financial foundation of the country during the Reconstruction Era.”–

    EXPLANATION:
    https://t.co/Qbdge6eTNn


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 17:23:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655624573478481948

  • POSITIVE LAW ISN’T LEGITIMATE AND THEREFORE “LAW” BUT NATURAL LAW IS LEGITIMATE

    POSITIVE LAW ISN’T LEGITIMATE AND THEREFORE “LAW” BUT NATURAL LAW IS LEGITIMATE AND THEREFORE “LAW”

    Explanation: Laws of Nature (physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and logical) then the Natural Law of Cooperation within the limits of the laws of nature (natural duties, rights, inalienations) that prohibit negative behaviors and construct ‘the order’ of cooperation, then legislative contracts within the limits of the natural law of cooperation (contractual duties, rightts and inalienations) that produce positive behaviors, then private contracts within the limits of the legislative laws, the natural laws, and the laws of nature, that produce private commons, and then informal signals, manners, norms, traditions, values that facilitate cooperation – and so we have laws of nature, natural law, legislative contracts of the commons, private contracts of the private sector, and normative contracts independent of assets (demonstrated intersts), and findings of the hierarchy of courts of the empircal, common law.

    While Natural Law prohibits all authority thereby requiring Concurrency in positive legislation, and Commonality in negative dispute resolution across regions, classes (and now sexes), limiting us to *decidability* and therefore to *science*, Positive Law is an attempt to create a ruling class (Russia France, Judaism) that violates the self determination of individuals, families and groups, by violating the inaliebiity right and obligation for reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means, by test of sovereignty in demonstrated interest, and reciprocity in display word and deed, limiting us to voluntary competitive markets for cooperation in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war, and aversarial markets for dispute resolution before a jury of our peers (or voluntary duel, or fight, or argument).

    Under this formulation of the natural scientific, law of cooperation, there is no difference between what is moral and what is legitmate (legal). In fact the entire structure of it, beginning with self determination by soverignty and reciprocity, prohibiting authority, requiring a means of decidability, consists of the criteria for deciding what actions are moral and legitimate, and therefor enforcible laws, within the limits of the natural law of cooperation and laws of nature, without violating morality, which we discovred scientifically through the long term empirical tests of commonality and concurrency: the natural law itself.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 14:27:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655580266604158978

  • THE ORB? The orb is presented to British monarchs during their coronation. Datin

    THE ORB?
    The orb is presented to British monarchs during their coronation. Dating back to Charles II’s coronation in 1661, this piece of regalia is golden and has a cross perched on top to symbolize heavenly power over the world. It is mounted with emeralds, rubies, sapphires, diamonds, pearls and one amethyst.

    TRANSLATION
    The British invented the modern rule of law state, that completed the 2000-year project of governing by Natural Law (science of cooperation) being the application of ‘God’s Law’ with the monarchy as judge of last resort (highest court), parliament (political court), King’s Courts of the common law ( for serious matters ), shire courts (for commercial matters), and church courts (for moral matters), creating a hierarchy of courts and appeals or what is more correctly understood as a hierarchy of markets for justice by the law of man, nature, and nature’s god. 😉

    Silly (ignorant really) people who don’t understand the problems of evidence, testimony, reciprocity, tort (natural law), the problems of decidability, the fallibility of humans, in both criticism and fashion, and the need for a hierarchy of courts culminating in the monarchy as the judge of last resort, and the monarchy being above the law in the restoration of the law, nor the genius of the innovation the english people brought by their invention of the modern rule of law state, fail to grasp the value and importance of the british monarchy – or any european monarchy – and underestimate the importance of rule of law by the natural, common, and concurrent law, and underestimate the harm that comes from sovereignty of parliament (opinion) instead of sovereignty of natural law (science of cooperation), and underestimate the defense the Americans have from such follies of parliament by our constitution and sovereignty of natural law, nor the follies of the americans by use of a president instead of prime minister and monarchy.

    We always take for granted what we are ignorant of. The monarchy is our last line of defense of european civilization, and we made a drastic mistake of listening to the folly of Rousseau and the French fantasies, versus the thousands of years of our natural, common, concurrent, law as the most empirical system of government every designed by man, with the greatest possibility for continuous innovation, adaptation, evolution the prosperity that results.

    Cheers
    Much Love
    God Save the King.

    #Coronation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 17:46:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654905511240777728

  • I don’t say otherwise. I say that all people are capable of gradually evovlving

    I don’t say otherwise. I say that all people are capable of gradually evovlving rule of law and polities that produce comons desired or necessary for their development.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 21:14:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654595339750453251

    Reply addressees: @antigg860413

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654578776985022464

  • THE HIERARCHY IN THE SPECTRUM OF EXISTING ORDERS |Organization|: Tribes > Ethnic

    THE HIERARCHY IN THE SPECTRUM OF EXISTING ORDERS
    |Organization|: Tribes > Ethnicities > Countries > Empires > Nation States > Federations.

    Anglos-Germanosphere: Federations of Nation States. Corruption is largely the private capture of the financial sector leading to an oligarchy there, and clientelism in the state, serving special interests at the expense of the people.
    Hindu Ethnic Federation: India, while technically a civilization of many sub-ethnostates, populated by sub-ethno-classes, is maturing into a federation in order to produce sufficient political, economic, and military organization to overcome repetitions of the many previous invasions, teeters on the border between secularism and theolocracy, much like the Americans, but with a demographic and territorial burden where americans had an opportunity.
    French: Colonialism: France manintains a set of African colonies. Corruption is largely state sector profit at the expense of the population.
    Russia: Ethinic Imperialism: Russia maintains an empire across multiple races, ethnicities and religons, and captures, conquers, or kills within those borders. Corruption is largely analogous to organized crime where state actors and their clients extract vast cash holdings at the expense of the people,
    China: Racial Imperialism: China maintains an empire across multipe ethnicities, does so by conquest, engages in ethnic cleansing, and is the largest organized crime system in the world, with vast appropriation from the people at the people’s expense, but this corruption extends down to the local bureaucratic, commercial, and individual level in poor workmanship, and unwillingness to take responsibility for the commons
    Jewish and Islamic Seditious Cultural Theocracy:
    Migratory pastoralist strategy of rebellion against the merit hierarchy, aristocracy, of the Indo Europeans by taking advantage of the tolerance higher trust trifunctional polities to bait the non-military, and non-productive (clerical, credentialed), and under-productive (women and the underclasses) into the false promise in exchange for adoption of a fundamentalist cult cult whether supernatural and abrahamic, or philosophical and abrahamic, or psueoscientific and abrahamic, that promises freedom from formal (logical, truth), behavioral(self interst, productivity, meritocracy, hierarchy) and evolutionary (natural selection, genetic load) to recreate the parasitic credentialed clerical rule by false elites, that have caused collapse, stagnation and decline wherever they spread.

    South american is latin and it’s own civilization. Sub Saharan Africa is also it’s own civilization. And the Irano-Turkics have been thoroughly captured by the South Eurasian MENA/Isalmic civilization. But their future is still open. And given their demographic distributions it’s difficult to see how they don’t follow the post-american world back into authoritarianism and imperial networks instead of federations.

    I hope this was helpful.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:19:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654113598300405762

  • Sort of. Given that most conflict between Natural Law (tort), the common law, th

    Sort of. Given that most conflict between Natural Law (tort), the common law, the constitution, concurrent legislation, (arbitrary) regulation, competing findings of the courts, and arbitrary commands, is due to a relatively small number of properties and requirements missing from the common law and constitution that are relatively easily fixed. As such we can identify (a) divergence from decidability and (b) conflicts, exposing the complexity that results such that those divergences and conflicts are open for discussion and decision. The truth is that we’ve tested about 130 of the top questions of legal decidability (topics) and all are decidable. Now, what you might say is that some positive law is necessary even if it is in fact illegitimate. But I’d respond with ‘find a way of achieving it that isn’t illegitimate’. Education, bussing, force association, interference in marriage and divorce, the withdrawal of shrilling and minimization of defamation, and worse the right of ‘free false, unethical, immoral, and seditious, speech’, and the absence of necessity of legislation to pass a court’s test of legitimacy, have all been catastrophic positive law policies that could have been achieved by alternative means with less harm done.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 18:41:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653469848104517658

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653464803803840517

  • Sort of. Given that most conflict between Natural Law (tort), the common law, th

    Sort of. Given that most conflict between Natural Law (tort), the common law, the constitution, concurrent legislation, (arbitrary) regulation, competing findings of the courts, and arbitrary commands, is due to a relatively small number of properties and requirements missing from the common law and constitution that are relatively easily fixed. As such we can identify (a) divergence from decidability and (b) conflicts, exposing the complexity that results such that those divergences and conflicts are open for discussion and decision. The truth is that we’ve tested about 130 of the top questions of legal decidability (topics) and all are decidable. Now, what you might say is that some positive law is necessary even if it is in fact illegitimate. But I’d respond with ‘find a way of achieving it that isn’t illegitimate’. Education, bussing, force association, interference in marriage and divorce, the withdrawal of shrilling and minimization of defamation, and worse the right of ‘free false, unethical, immoral, and seditious, speech’, and the absence of necessity of legislation to pass a court’s test of legitimacy, have all been catastrophic positive law policies that could have been achieved by alternative means with less harm done.

    Reply addressees: @laurencediver @stycksintern @functi0nZer0


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 18:41:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653469847932530688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653464803803840517

  • While unintuitive, it is possible to produce a formal logic of decidability in t

    While unintuitive, it is possible to produce a formal logic of decidability in the law, that will eliminate all but ‘collisions’ of policy, and over time may prevent collisions of policy, thereby constraining the precision of policy, and preventing ‘lawfare’ to circumvent the people and the legislatures. While I’m not sure Scalia himself understood the full meaning of what he was advocating, and while I’m uncertain that it was possible to do so before the cognitive revolution produced by the introduction of programmatic logic, it is at present possible to complete the natural law (science) of decidability, and then test the deviation of that decidability from that ‘optimum’.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 16:36:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653438411691130881

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653431404980469763

  • While unintuitive, it is possible to produce a formal logic of decidability in t

    While unintuitive, it is possible to produce a formal logic of decidability in the law, that will eliminate all but ‘collisions’ of policy, and over time may prevent collisions of policy, thereby constraining the precision of policy, and preventing ‘lawfare’ to circumvent the people and the legislatures. While I’m not sure Scalia himself understood the full meaning of what he was advocating, and while I’m uncertain that it was possible to do so before the cognitive revolution produced by the introduction of programmatic logic, it is at present possible to complete the natural law (science) of decidability, and then test the deviation of that decidability from that ‘optimum’.

    Reply addressees: @laurencediver @stycksintern @functi0nZer0


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 16:36:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653438411603050511

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653431404980469763

  • If you want to see what a revolution looks like and 30M dead bodies then that’s

    If you want to see what a revolution looks like and 30M dead bodies then that’s what it will take.
    Never happen.
    The court can in fact deny stacking the court is constitutional (it is). 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 16:33:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653437577410510852

    Reply addressees: @RepAdamSchiff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653148073714139138