(important piece)(I will write more on this later. But it will explain my emphasis on operationalism and strict construction) [B]efore about 1830, when the British Empire adopted commercial universalism, Britain was a member of germanic, north sea, hanseatic, civilization. We tend to compare our British ancestors to Today’s Britons who are heavily catholicized and franglicized, and certainly members of socialist cults of hyper signaling through quests for artificial moralism. But the majority of anglo immigrants arrive before the civil war, and the majority of german immigrants before the second world war. And the majority of white americans trace their history to germanic origins. Our warriors in our wars – all of them – are largely germanic. Our Teutons (warrior caste) have been our great leaders. Our founders had far more in common with their german counterparts in pre-unification Germany, than they did with middle class and commercial victorian Britons. They may have spoken English. They may have learned French. They may have ridiculed the ‘backwardness’ of the Germans. But for all intents and purposes they were Germanic, Protestant, Hanseatic, North Sea peoples with germanic aspirations and germanic values. And because of its libertarian political structure, Hanseatic Civilization (of the north sea peoples) does not receive historical treatment that the statist era the destroyed it under napoleon, and with napoleon set the destruction of western civilization in motion. The american states had more in common with the german principalities than they did with their British ancestors. Our indoctrination into the ‘frame’ of war-making-nation-states obscures too much information from us. There is some truth that in the ancient, medieval, and modern worlds, there was an acknowledge conspiracy between today’s catholic(mediterranean trade) states that the germans be left alone so that they defended the frontier from the barbarians of the east. But we are a germanic people – a north sea people. Water ways determined evolution more so than land masses since it is waterways that provide routes for discounted conduct of trade. The american civil war – over control of the continent with slavery as the excuse – and Lincoln’s destruction of the germanic states, and their conversion to Napoleonic centrality, was the second great tragedy of Europe. And the attempt to unify Europe under a federal government the third great tragedy. We can now only struggle to overthrow the failed Enlightenment projects, and return to polycentrism which was the competitive cause of western political, military, and commercial innovation. Scale increases the promise of mutual insurance in exchange for the stagnation and systemic parasitism that results from all organizational certainty. Only change and conflict strengthen (see Taleb), and certainty increases fragility. So we can also state that libertarian sentiments of our anglo saxon ancestors were artificially protected just as the libertarian sentiments of our Icelandic and american ancestors. And that it is only our Scandinavian(middle ages) and Prussian(enlightenment) ancestors that held europe’s indo-european warrior traditions as central cultural values. (This is an uncomfortable truth that libertarians will have difficulty swallowing.) America is a Germanic Country, Conquered by French Nation-statism, Invaded by The Second Great Jewish Lie of Pseudoscience, The Great Deceit of Postmodernism that followed, and saved only by the challenge of overcoming the nearly but not fully, strictly constructed Anglo Saxon Common Law. Hence my radically analytic pursuit of Truth, and Strict Construction (operationalism) so that it is possible to reform our ancient germanic polycentric government so that it cannot be changed by political means, can may only evolve methods of voluntary cooperation. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
Isn’t America a Germanic Not Just Anglo Country?
(important piece)(I will write more on this later. But it will explain my emphasis on operationalism and strict construction) [B]efore about 1830, when the British Empire adopted commercial universalism, Britain was a member of germanic, north sea, hanseatic, civilization. We tend to compare our British ancestors to Today’s Britons who are heavily catholicized and franglicized, and certainly members of socialist cults of hyper signaling through quests for artificial moralism. But the majority of anglo immigrants arrive before the civil war, and the majority of german immigrants before the second world war. And the majority of white americans trace their history to germanic origins. Our warriors in our wars – all of them – are largely germanic. Our Teutons (warrior caste) have been our great leaders. Our founders had far more in common with their german counterparts in pre-unification Germany, than they did with middle class and commercial victorian Britons. They may have spoken English. They may have learned French. They may have ridiculed the ‘backwardness’ of the Germans. But for all intents and purposes they were Germanic, Protestant, Hanseatic, North Sea peoples with germanic aspirations and germanic values. And because of its libertarian political structure, Hanseatic Civilization (of the north sea peoples) does not receive historical treatment that the statist era the destroyed it under napoleon, and with napoleon set the destruction of western civilization in motion. The american states had more in common with the german principalities than they did with their British ancestors. Our indoctrination into the ‘frame’ of war-making-nation-states obscures too much information from us. There is some truth that in the ancient, medieval, and modern worlds, there was an acknowledge conspiracy between today’s catholic(mediterranean trade) states that the germans be left alone so that they defended the frontier from the barbarians of the east. But we are a germanic people – a north sea people. Water ways determined evolution more so than land masses since it is waterways that provide routes for discounted conduct of trade. The american civil war – over control of the continent with slavery as the excuse – and Lincoln’s destruction of the germanic states, and their conversion to Napoleonic centrality, was the second great tragedy of Europe. And the attempt to unify Europe under a federal government the third great tragedy. We can now only struggle to overthrow the failed Enlightenment projects, and return to polycentrism which was the competitive cause of western political, military, and commercial innovation. Scale increases the promise of mutual insurance in exchange for the stagnation and systemic parasitism that results from all organizational certainty. Only change and conflict strengthen (see Taleb), and certainty increases fragility. So we can also state that libertarian sentiments of our anglo saxon ancestors were artificially protected just as the libertarian sentiments of our Icelandic and american ancestors. And that it is only our Scandinavian(middle ages) and Prussian(enlightenment) ancestors that held europe’s indo-european warrior traditions as central cultural values. (This is an uncomfortable truth that libertarians will have difficulty swallowing.) America is a Germanic Country, Conquered by French Nation-statism, Invaded by The Second Great Jewish Lie of Pseudoscience, The Great Deceit of Postmodernism that followed, and saved only by the challenge of overcoming the nearly but not fully, strictly constructed Anglo Saxon Common Law. Hence my radically analytic pursuit of Truth, and Strict Construction (operationalism) so that it is possible to reform our ancient germanic polycentric government so that it cannot be changed by political means, can may only evolve methods of voluntary cooperation. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
There is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Penta
There is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Pentateuch, or the Bible, and the American Constitution: they were the product of committees constructing the criteria for civil law. This is quite contradictory to the Indo European Tradition in which law EVOLVES.
But these things are constructs of man for the purpose of governing man.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-23 03:23:00 UTC
-
“Just as law is discovered, and that we need only a small set of axioms from whi
—“Just as law is discovered, and that we need only a small set of axioms from which all others an be derived; amongst which are natural law, rule of law, and property rights – do we obfuscate gods in that we start with a near-infinite variety the further we go back in time; almost with one distinct God for each miraculously varying pattern; and as we understand more about power structures and humanity, the more we reduce the Godly behaviors into the individual and reduce the amount of gods to believe in, until, finally we have the individual.”— Johannes Meixner
(That is how great minds find patterns of similarity between previously dissimilar concepts. Awesome. )
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 12:46:00 UTC
-
UK CONTRACT LAW VS US CONTRACT LAW You know the UK law is structured as terribly
UK CONTRACT LAW VS US CONTRACT LAW
You know the UK law is structured as terribly front-loaded placing huge burdens on ALL individuals and organizations. It’s like everyone is afraid of losing a dime, and spends a hundred bucks to save every dime. But you know, I know the source of it: (a) British desire to demonstrate signaling through moral high ground (b) continental hatred of entrepreneurship and capitalism.
American law is back-loaded so that if problems arise they can be settled logically in court, placing burdens ONLY on individuals and organizations that have problems.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 08:07:00 UTC
-
(important piece) THE SECRETS OF THE WEST’S SUCCESS: AXIS 1) Militarism, Militia
(important piece)
THE SECRETS OF THE WEST’S SUCCESS:
AXIS 1) Militarism, Militia, Heroism, Truth,
AXIS 2) Sovereignty. Private Property, Voluntary Exchange, Contract
AXIS 3) Jury, Common Law, Rule of law & Universal Standing, Natural Law
AXIS 4) Debate, Reason, Philosophy, Logic, Science, Medicine
AXIS 6) Near Breeding Eugenics, Manorial Eugenics, Criminal Eugenics
CLASSES
The People Who Fight (defense – order) Aristocratic
The People Who Farm (capital – production) Libertarian.
The People Who Gather (labor – consumption) Socialist.
THE CATASTROPHE’S
The Follies: Athenian/Spartan and Anglo/German civil wars.
The Plagues: i) Justinian / Arab ii) The Black Death
The Invasions: The demographic invasions of Greece, Of Rome, Of the Roman Empire, of Europe and Americas.
The Great Lies: i) Jewish Christianity, ii) Jewish Pseudoscience, iii) Islamism
The Great Losses: Arab and Turkish Conquests of The East , The Communist Revolution in Russia, Russian Conquest of Eastern Europe,
TECHNOLOGIES (undone)
1) Narrative, Writing, The Story, The Dramatic Play, The Novel, The Serial.
2) Counting, Positional Numbering, Arithmetic, Accounting, Computerized Accounting,
3) Mathematics (sets), Geometry (space), Calculus (relative change), Statistics (probability),
4) (physics)
5) (evolutionary biology)
6) (economics)
7) (truth) Syllogism, ..(correspondence).. Critical Rationalism, Testimonialism,
…
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-19 02:42:00 UTC
-
Can We Construct A Fixed Constitution?
[A]lexander I am fairly certain that it is possible if not necessary to construct a finished constitutional basis for rule of law. It may be impossible to imagine the means of production of commons that we call government within that rule of law. Because the basis of the rule of law appears to be a universal logical necessity. Yet the basis of government production of commons under rule of law is a mere technology that must adapt to innovations in knowledge. Just as the common law must constantly innovate in order to prohibit newly found means of imposing costs upon others against their will. So from this perspective the hierarch of law is:
Which is a bottom up construction of a constitutional order. Curt Doolittle. The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine.
-
Can We Construct A Fixed Constitution?
[A]lexander I am fairly certain that it is possible if not necessary to construct a finished constitutional basis for rule of law. It may be impossible to imagine the means of production of commons that we call government within that rule of law. Because the basis of the rule of law appears to be a universal logical necessity. Yet the basis of government production of commons under rule of law is a mere technology that must adapt to innovations in knowledge. Just as the common law must constantly innovate in order to prohibit newly found means of imposing costs upon others against their will. So from this perspective the hierarch of law is:
Which is a bottom up construction of a constitutional order. Curt Doolittle. The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine.
-
Alexander I am fairly certain that it is possible if not necessary to construct
Alexander
I am fairly certain that it is possible if not necessary to construct a finished constitutional basis for rule of law.
It may be impossible to imagine the means of production of commons that we call government within that rule of law.
Because the basis of the rule of law appears to be a universal logical necessity.
Yet the basis of government production of commons under rule of law is a mere technology that must adapt to innovations in knowledge.
Just as the common law must constantly innovate in order to prohibit newly found means of imposing costs upon others against their will.
So from this perspective the hierarch of law is:
1) Rule of law and Logic of contract (fixed)
2) Resolutions of disputes. ( juridically expandable)
3) Construction of commons. (Constitutionally modifiable)
Which is a bottom up construction of a constitutional order.
Curt Doolittle.
The Propertarian Institute.
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-16 06:16:00 UTC
-
Reducing Our Biological Differences To Rule Of Law
[I] think the tide has changed and that science of HBD has won out over “The Great Boazian Lie”. POSITION Most variation in human behavior is hormonal, normative, and institutional. With the most influential difference in behavior (if not appearance) caused by norms and institutions. In other words, we ‘grow’ differently despite very similar genetic composition. 1) the majority of differences between the great tribes (races) is in the rates of reproduction of the lower classes. Or conversely, the rates of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the concentration of reproduction in the middle and upper classes. 2) that sexual maturity regulates aggression and impulse and time preference.(humans are no different from foxes or any other creature). Hence the increasing aggression (and penis size) from east asian, northern whites(Ukrainian), southern(Iranian) whites, arabs, and africans. 3) cranial size effects intelligence disproportionately since intelligence is largely a function of memory. 4) there appears to be a difference in the evolution of different brain agents (language in particular) and in cooperation (frontal lobe) that is expressed in the races, and verbal self expression both limits frustration and increases cooperation. 5) raw athletic ability decreases with decreases in sexual maturity. In other words, this hormonal theory of sexual maturity is a sufficient explanation for the variation in COMPETITIVENESS our gene pools, and the strategies that we adopt as norms and traditions given our competitiveness (or lack of it). And furthermore, any other theory would need be more parsimonious. And my position at present is that further improvement in our genetic understanding of man’s differences will augment rather than contradict or falsify this theory. Or put another way, the end of evolution is that we reach minimum sexual maturity for reproduction but never switch off the youth and on the maturity signals. Why am I only concerned about this level of precision rather than enumerating what appear to be significant differences between races (including the Ukrainian white and Indo-Iranian White)? Because I don’t need to suggest universalism under paternal aristocracy. Meaning I’m not advocating universalism. I’m not advocating diversity or equality. I’m merely pointing out that each tribe and sub-tribe will evolve into a high trust society that is not a threat to its neighbors if it practices eugenic reproduction and rule of law. Not an aristocracy of everyone, but everyone living in aristocracies. THEREFORE The problem for any society to solve is largely one of reducing the relative size of the individuals below what we consider 106IQ today, and a target for any polity should be a distribution no less that 115, and preferably 125 if we wish to see ‘Star Trek’ – whereas the current downward trend is producing a devolution to a future of ‘Favelas’. WORSE It is possible that we have passed peak human, since it is very difficult to cleans defective genes from a polity, and intelligence is comprised of a complex set of genetic biases. EXAMPLES China surpasses india both because of superior suppression of the underclasses, and superior ability of the red army to force literacy. THE WEST The west succeeded because of (a) Aristocratic egalitarianism (b) martial truth (d) dramatic culling of the lower classes both by starvation, access to land, and aggressive hanging. You do not so much improve your population as limit the harm done to it by the lower classes. This is a consistent theme that I’ve discovered in most of my work: we do not know the truth but we know falsehood. WE do not know goods but we know bads. We cannot breed better men, we can only stop bad men from breeding more. The EUGENICS program was perhaps the most important objective of western man, and the failure of it due to women and pseudosciences was the second catastrophe. 1) The Enlightenment fallacy of oppressed man vs eugenic civilization. 2) The Enlightenment undermining of monarchy, aristocracy, instead of addition of new houses for newly participatory classes. 3) The enfranchisement of women and women’s advocacy of enfranchising slaves as a means of gaining their own enfranchisement. 4) The Jewish Cosmopolitan Pseudoscientific movement as an attempt to create a second Religion for women and slaves (underclasses): Boaz(sociology), Marx(economics), Freud (psychology), Frankfurt School (politics). 5) The Anglo attack on german civilization in the first war. The anglo attack on german civilization in the second war, and failure of Germany to restore european civilization to aristocratic, aesthetic, and egalitarian origins. 6) The adoption of the Pseudoscientific Religion by the Academy, State, Media complex and its appeal to women in academy: as revenue, state voting as power, and consumer consumption of goods as revenue. (a degree in other than STEM fields appears to be nothing more than a modern sale of Indulgences to build universities instead of churches.) 7) The 1965/66 Immigration law by which the Women, Blacks, Jews, the Pseudoscientific Religion of the Academy, State, Media complex sought to achieve through depopulation (destruction of the family) and immigration (invasion) what they could not achieve by propaganda. 8) The failure of the masculine, familial, conservative, libertarian, and scientific thought leadership to produce a body of thought to counter the second use of women as a means of distributing the Pseudoscientific Revolution’s attempt at the Second Great Lie (pseudoscience) second only to the First Great Lie (monotheism). (Which Propertarianism and Testimonialism, Genetic and Cognitive science, plus a century of recorded damage to civilization help to overturn.) 9) the great wealth to be made from the conquest and sale of the North American (US/Canadian), and Australian continents, has been interpreted as a property of American Democracy rather than american democracy is a temporary luxury made possible by the rather ridiculous wealth from the 300 year long sale of the Continent to immigrants. And while we were limited to immigration of middle class gene pools without access to land from above the Hanjal line, we now are engaged in a pollution of all forms of capital. (the same applies to Russia by the way.) Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine