@Mises Hayek:rule-of-law=liberty. Mises: operationalism -ergo social science. Rothbard: extends Locke:Soc-sci. expressible as prop.rights.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:07:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767000207040978944
@Mises Hayek:rule-of-law=liberty. Mises: operationalism -ergo social science. Rothbard: extends Locke:Soc-sci. expressible as prop.rights.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:07:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767000207040978944
Austrian: Social Science(facilitation). Chicago: Rule of Law (limited). Mainstream: Discretionary rule(maximum).
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:03:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766999158012076032
Reply addressees: @mises @NewmanJ_R
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765716053133438976
IN REPLY TO:
@mises
5 Reasons Why Austrian Economics Is Better than the Mainstream | Jonathan Newman @NewmanJ_R
https://t.co/lnoxGmwUKT https://t.co/ucMAovjJPU
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765716053133438976
Some notes on law.
One cannot enact a policy (obtain a current gain or defer a current cost) that future generations will pay for.
On cannot enact a policy that one cannot reverse.
One cannot enact a policy that one cannot pay restitution for.
One cannot enact a policy that is retroactive.
(we cannot interfere with planning, we can only insure against shocks)
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 12:28:00 UTC
A NATION? NATIONALISM? VS STATISM?
A State, and bureaucracy, provide fertile ground for parasitism, for the sole reason that a majority of men do not demand Rule of Law, under Natural Law, using Judge Discovered Law, and accumulating in the Common Law.
A nation is quite good at preventing alternative ‘tax farms’, brought into being by conquest using war, religion, immigration, trade. And arguably, as an extension of the tribe, the nation is best at it.
Those that could not form sedentary societies were destroyed by those that could. Since a sedentary society is productive, not parasitic.
Jews, Gypsies, underclass immigration, and we ‘migratory occidental craftsmen’, vary in value from catastrophically harmful, to a net loss, to of some limited economic value by providing expertise – we are a questionable exception, not a definite rule.
All of us live under the political orders that survive competition, not those we choose to have were that competition were absent.
Man was not in the past, nor is he today, good. He is rational. He chooses predation when it is rational, parasitism when rational, production when it is rational, and trade when it is rational. We create institutions to deny him the rational choice of predation or parasitism, and thereby force all people into either production or trade.
From that thing we call ‘rule’, by rule of law, we can possibly eliminate all discretion but judicial discretion, and judicial discretion only within the limits of that law. But in no case can we eliminate organized production of commons and survive competition.
The west advanced faster than the rest, because we created the most difficult commons for any people to produce: truth, property, jury, and natural, common, judge-discovered law.
In other words: social science. It’s our invention of social science, (law) that we applied to other fields.
And that law is insured, and enforced, by the organized application of violence by ‘the peers’ – those men who demand rule of law.
Those who cannot pay for war, cannot as a consequence, pay for staving off war by others.
Wishing for liberty does not make liberty so.
Violence alone does.
We fight for liberty under natural law, judge-discovered common law, with universal standing and rule of law (universal application), or we shall not have it.
For we will fail to rais the price of rule to some other means of decidability, organization of property.
And our only sincere permanent allies in such a long term war are our kin.
Ergo. Nationalism: kin under natural law, with a market for reproduction, a market for production and consumption, and a market for commons.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 08:28:00 UTC
The American constitution created a system wherein the natural aristocracy could not be DISEMPOWERED by other classes, but where none of the natural aristocracy could obtain SUFFICIENT power to deprive other members of it. Ergo, the American model could not sustain expansion of the franchise.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-19 02:36:00 UTC
It’s just ‘uncomfortable’ that instead of inspirational scientists, philosophers, and priests, the origin of western civ’s success, is Law.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-18 08:12:00 UTC
Enfranchising:
without :
The english system of multiple houses created a market for the construction of commons between the classes. Creating majoritarian single-house democracy created majority tyranny, and put the lowest classes with the largest numbers in control of government and has destroyed western civilizations’ historical dependence upon empiricism in under a century.
This required we basically develop propaganda, ideology, and deception in order to rule underclasses by vote.
This single decision, made in the euphoria of the proceeds of the industrial revolution, caused the destruction of western civilization.
https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-worst-mistake-in-a-Democracy
Enfranchising:
without :
The english system of multiple houses created a market for the construction of commons between the classes. Creating majoritarian single-house democracy created majority tyranny, and put the lowest classes with the largest numbers in control of government and has destroyed western civilizations’ historical dependence upon empiricism in under a century.
This required we basically develop propaganda, ideology, and deception in order to rule underclasses by vote.
This single decision, made in the euphoria of the proceeds of the industrial revolution, caused the destruction of western civilization.
https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-worst-mistake-in-a-Democracy
West evolved truth, jury, common law. Fastest method of adaptation possible.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-17 20:21:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766007175416340481
Reply addressees: @FemaBand @ThomasEWoods @lewrockwell @jeffdeist @jtsale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766006954569310208
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766006954569310208
I love MI too. But An-cap is dead. Rule of Law, NPP, property-in-toto = only chance.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-17 20:07:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766003462786125826
Reply addressees: @FemaBand @ThomasEWoods @lewrockwell @jeffdeist @jtsale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766003096052871168
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766003096052871168