Theme: Constitutional Order

LAW, SCIENCE, OUR DEMANDS, AND REBELLION

Well, we CAN’T teach law as science any longer because of the conflation between regulation, legislation, and Natural Law, where regulation and legislation are not bound by Natural Law. We cease having law that is categorically, internally, externally, and morally consistent, and therefore we no longer possess rule of law, but rule of discretion: the need for subjective information not provided by the law.

If we taught Natural Law, common, judge-discovered law, universal standing, universal application (rule of law), and that it was possible to create strictly constructed, categorically, internally, externally, morally, scope, consistent law, then we could teach law as social science not ‘an attempt at unbiased discretion’ while advancing some agenda or other.

We CAN teach law as social science, and we can live under a scientific and contractual government (rule of law: nomocracy). But to do so will require as violent a revolution as all other anglo revolutions: to raise the cost of discretionary, and arbitrary rule, such that non-discretionary rule of law is preferable to constant rebellion.

This is our mission really.

1 – demand for rule of law: natural law, judge-discovered common law, universal standing, and universal applicability.

2 – demand for multi-house, market government, under legal dissent rather than majority assent.

3 – demand for the defense of the informational commons

4 – demand for the restoration of the militia and the regiments.

5 – demand for the circumvention of the financial system in the issuance of liquidity.

And to issue these demands, then interrupt and destroy the economy and the abilty to rule until there is no alternative left but the restoration of moral and scientific government instead of corrupt, immoral, and discretionary government.

Fire is our first technology of mass destruction

And it is still our best.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine