#Calexit There is no advantage to territorial scale if different regions cannot pursue cultural and legal preferences that they seek.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:49:00 UTC
#Calexit There is no advantage to territorial scale if different regions cannot pursue cultural and legal preferences that they seek.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:49:00 UTC
But yes, the purpose of the electoral college was just that: prevent populous state ‘fashion’ from overrunning the smaller.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 06:50:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796605933292056577
Reply addressees: @mmlvia
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796550695667298304
IN REPLY TO:
@mmlvia
@curtdoolittle Stupidest argument I’ve heard. Every citizen has an equal right to vote. Besides, virtually all Americans are immigrants.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796550695667298304
WE HAVE ONE DECADE IN WHICH TO DEVOLVE THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND BEGIN THE PROCESS OF LOCAL AND REGIONALIZATION AS DEFENSE AGAINST IMMIGRANT CITIES.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 06:36:00 UTC
The Purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent overloaded immigrant cities with asymmetric populations from dominating.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 22:32:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796480699121405953
Reply addressees: @mmlvia
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796470556430192640
IN REPLY TO:
@mmlvia
Isn’t the purpose of the #ElectoralCollege to prevent a total maniac from being elected? #PopularVote #Election2016 #ElectionHangover
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796470556430192640
(The only fix is devolution of legislation to the states, or secession.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 11:54:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796320094137815040
Reply addressees: @seanhannity
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796298009013264384
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796298009013264384
https://t.co/v9qXsj5I2pRetweeted Aus-Alt-Right (@the_arv):
Counter-Currents: Enlightened Patriarchy: Frederick the Great’s Principles of Lawmaking |
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 06:55:00 UTC
To my friends in Ukraine. You didn’t believe me, did you? 😉
American politics are just as corrupt as Ukrainian. It’s just that we’re a lot richer, and our courts aren’t corrupt. So Americans threw out the entire government this time. You need to do it again. This time, kill enough of them that they fear you.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 04:16:00 UTC
Then apparently we need to limit voting to those who had four grandparents here before the Voting Rights Act.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 23:59:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796140114703433728
Reply addressees: @AnnCoulter @RichardBSpencer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795833821501460480
IN REPLY TO:
@AnnCoulter
If only people with at least 4 grandparents born in America were voting, Trump would win in a 50-state landslide.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795833821501460480
—“A Trump victory would create the possibility of a coalition of conservatives, populists, patriots and nationalists governing America, should he lose, America’s future appears disunited and grim.”— Buchannan
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 10:56:00 UTC
Markets are simply the only means of preserving asymmetry and removing asymmetry of power and information. Courts are the only means of preserving asymmetry of warranty of performance.
I don’t think markets are subordinate to hierarchy in any sense other than I think that they themselves prohibit hierarchy by permitting the meritocratic rise and fall of the classes by means of DEMONSTRATED ACTIONS.
I don’t think a market for commons divided by the classes of production is a hierarchy, it is just a means of recognizing the forms of production that the meritocratic families have managed to produce and hold onto: families, business, enterprises, territories, and monarchy.
The fact that there is greater SCALE OF MERIT in each class is simply a fact of the market operating to ensure that we demonstrate the greatest rotation and maintain the families businesses, enterprises, and institutions, with the greatest merit.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 15:31:00 UTC