Restore hereditary peers to the house of lords or wait for a new aristocracy to emerge in the upcoming civil war?
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-03 13:52:00 UTC
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
MONARCHY AND RULE OF LAW Monarchy requires rule of law. It’s impossible to hold
MONARCHY AND RULE OF LAW
Monarchy requires rule of law.
It’s impossible to hold an absolute monarchy.
It’s impossible to hold a dictatorship under rule of law.
An absolute monarchy is a contradiction in terms.
European Monarchy is, as far as I know, the correct label for common law monarchies of our ancient past.
Christian Monarchy is, as far as I know, the correct label for medieval monarchies, since monarchies did not exist as we know them prior to the church’s crowning of ‘legitimate’ kings of europe.
Constitutional Monarchies are perhaps where we went wrong, since it make the judge of last resort (monarch) subservient to a legislature(politics), rather than to the rule of natural law (the church), or to the rule of common law (judges).
Stated in these terms which emphasize the negative (judging) it is more obvious than when stated in the positive (legislation or command).
A ruler can only judge. A market can only choose. Anyone can envison.
By envisioning, choosing my market, and judging (limiting) by monarch we funnel ideas through a series of challenges that ensure that only those with the most merit survive.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-03 13:15:00 UTC
-
I realize this is hard to understand, but in the simplest example, most cultures
I realize this is hard to understand, but in the simplest example, most cultures conflate religion and law. Ours maintained the separation. We preserve separation and therefore competition everywhere. Because sovereignty is our founding principle -t hat which makes us westerners. All other virtues of western civlization derive from – are a consequence of – sovereignty. Our separation of church (weak) and state (strong) is just what we think of most frequently. Or our separation of powers. But these separations exist to preserve sovereignty. We merely justify them as good because we intuit the preservation of sovereignty as a good where most other cultures are incapable of producing institutions that can survive competition.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 14:37:00 UTC
-
NOTHING SHOULD BE DEMOCRATIC. Peace is undesirable in the choice between a homel
https://news.grabien.com/story-kerry-israel-can-either-be-jewish-or-democratic-it-cannot-beACTUALLY, NOTHING SHOULD BE DEMOCRATIC.
Peace is undesirable in the choice between a homeland at the expense of conflict, and peace at the expense of a second failure to preserve a homeland. Jews must learn to rule – including themselves. Christians must return to rule. Democracy – the abandonment of rule – is a failed experiment. We pretend that democracy is a good rather than just the cheapest method of rule with the least consequences for the rulers. So we claim democracy as an ideological good when it is instead – when combined with fiat credit – a cheaper method of rule. And worse, not all civilizations, or peoples, have reached a level of development – either political, cultural or genetic – that is sufficient for cooperation on purely economic grounds and under democratic polities. Instead, it appears, that democracy and economic cooperation are luxury goods made possible by military and technological windfalls, and nothing more.
If for no other reason than self-defense, those of us with the ability to rule well – meaning with a positive evolutionary outcome for man – must rule, while those who are incapable of rule – meaning producing a negative evolutionary outcome for man – must be ruled. There is no alternative except wishful thinking. And wishful thinking is found most frequently as the pavement on the road to hell.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 12:58:00 UTC
-
( evidence is to the contrary. Monarchy + rule of common law has the best record
( evidence is to the contrary. Monarchy + rule of common law has the best record )
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-23 16:02:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812327413564796928
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDame @AnnCoulter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812015343111696384
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812015343111696384
-
Monarchies have a better record than republics, and republics better than democr
Monarchies have a better record than republics, and republics better than democracies. Secret is no-monopoly: combine all three.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-23 16:01:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812327207750303744
Reply addressees: @AnnCoulter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812015041377607680
IN REPLY TO:
@AnnCoulter
Prince Charles warns we’re returning to dark days of 1930s. Listening to genetically retarded “royalty” is a return to the dark ages.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812015041377607680
-
Perfect Govt: Monarchy/veto:long-term, +republic/economy:mid-term, +democracy/sp
Perfect Govt: Monarchy/veto:long-term, +republic/economy:mid-term, +democracy/spending:short-term, +Rule of Natural Law:always.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-23 15:59:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812326804186923008
Reply addressees: @AnnCoulter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812015041377607680
IN REPLY TO:
@AnnCoulter
Prince Charles warns we’re returning to dark days of 1930s. Listening to genetically retarded “royalty” is a return to the dark ages.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812015041377607680
-
TRUMP WON THE POPULAR VOTE, JUST NOT THE CALIFORNIA POPULAR VOTE. —“Clinton’s
TRUMP WON THE POPULAR VOTE, JUST NOT THE CALIFORNIA POPULAR VOTE.
—“Clinton’s 2.3-million-popular-vote plurality over Trump depends on the votes in a single state: California. Clinton has more than a 4-million-vote plurality over Trump there. In the other 49 states plus the District of Columbia, Trump actually has a 1.7-million-popular-vote plurality over Clinton.”— James E. Campbell
IN OTHER WORDS, THE ELECTORAL VOTE SYSTEM DID ITS JOB OF PREVENTING ONE RADICAL STATE FROM OPPRESSING THE REST.
James E. Campbell is a UB Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University at Buffalo, SUNY, and is the author of “Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided America”.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-hillary-clinton-supporters-need-to-quit-whining-about-the-electoral-college-2016-11-30
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 11:13:00 UTC
-
“If you act like rule of law doesn’t exist, then let me oblige you.”—Josh Jepp
–“If you act like rule of law doesn’t exist, then let me oblige you.”—Josh Jeppson
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-12 20:32:00 UTC
-
Constitutional Convention? How about Hanging-Trees?
ON LIBERAL CALLS FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION: WE HAVE OTHER IDEAS – HANGING TREES FOR THE LIARS. No we are not having a constitutional convention. 1) Liberals have destroyed the constitution’s rule of law by arguing that we can pass whatever laws we want. The 14th amendment alone invalidated the constitution. What damage wasn’t done then was done by the income tax. What wasn’t done then was done by Roosevelt’s threat to stack the supreme court if we didn’t enact social security. If we can pass abortion, gay marriage, and obamacare, and if we have circumvented the amendment and convention process, then rule of law no longer exists. the government exists only out of habit, and simply hasn’t created enough discord to cause a revolution – until now.2) So lets just skip yet another leftist lie. There is no united states any longer, because there is no constitution any longer, because there is no rule of law any longer, because the liberals destroyed rule of law in order to destroy the united states by achieving through immigration of the third world against the will of the people in order to destroy the united states by an act of fraud.. 3) So here is what we suggest: the moment you call for a convention you’re declaring war. And we WANT a war. We love war. It is our greatest achievement after truth. We can agree that the undesirable states with the immigrant cities leave the union, freeing us from generations of accumulated debt and expense, and cultural and genetic conquest. Preserving the government. Or we can remove all federal legislation and return it to the states, and dissolve the supreme court, the congress and the presidency, leaving only the Military, the Treasury, and The Insurer of Last Resort, to be managed by a board of the governors. Or we will end the united states and devolve into separate regional polities that reflect regional cultures, and abandon the federal government entirely, returning all powers and functions to the regions or states. Or we can start a civil war, kill as many of each other and the members of the government that we can – and let the chips fall where they may. But what we will NOT do is allow the liberals to use the pretense of rule of law to engineer a conquest of our people, culture, and territories We’ll kill all of you first – and revel in it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine