MONARCHY AND RULE OF LAW Monarchy requires rule of law. It’s impossible to hold

MONARCHY AND RULE OF LAW

Monarchy requires rule of law.

It’s impossible to hold an absolute monarchy.

It’s impossible to hold a dictatorship under rule of law.

An absolute monarchy is a contradiction in terms.

European Monarchy is, as far as I know, the correct label for common law monarchies of our ancient past.

Christian Monarchy is, as far as I know, the correct label for medieval monarchies, since monarchies did not exist as we know them prior to the church’s crowning of ‘legitimate’ kings of europe.

Constitutional Monarchies are perhaps where we went wrong, since it make the judge of last resort (monarch) subservient to a legislature(politics), rather than to the rule of natural law (the church), or to the rule of common law (judges).

Stated in these terms which emphasize the negative (judging) it is more obvious than when stated in the positive (legislation or command).

A ruler can only judge. A market can only choose. Anyone can envison.

By envisioning, choosing my market, and judging (limiting) by monarch we funnel ideas through a series of challenges that ensure that only those with the most merit survive.