Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • Rule of Law by Natural Law of Reciprocity. Hereditary Monarchy as a Judge of Las

    Rule of Law by Natural Law of Reciprocity.

    Hereditary Monarchy as a Judge of Last Resort.

    Independent judiciary, militia, and army.

    Treasury as Insurer of Last Resort.

    Houses of the Commons for Justice and Military(Male); Finance, industry, and business; The Employed; Women and Family(Female).

    Contracts of the Commons can be constructed between any willing group and must merely survive the law and the military veto on legal or strategic grounds, and survive veto by the monarchy.

    The function of all law: the individual.

    The function of all policy: the family.

    Zero intertemporal (involuntary) transfer.

    Universal standing. Universal application. No retroactivity. Strict construction in operational language.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-15 10:34:00 UTC

  • Rule of Law by Natural Law of Reciprocity. Hereditary Monarchy as a Judge of Las

    Rule of Law by Natural Law of Reciprocity. Hereditary Monarchy as a Judge of Last Resort. Independent judiciary, militia, and army. Treasury as Insurer of Last Resort. Houses of the Commons for Justice and Military(Male); Finance, industry, and business; The Employed; Women and Family(Female). Contracts of the Commons can be constructed between any willing group and must merely survive the law and the military veto on legal or strategic grounds, and survive veto by the monarchy. The function of all law: the individual. The function of all policy: the family. Zero intertemporal (involuntary) transfer. Universal standing. Universal application. No retroactivity. Strict construction in operational language.

  • The Choices

    a) Rule (conflict resolution), b) Government(commons production), c) Market(Consumption production) 1 – Rule of Law vs Discretionary Rule 2 – Production of commons by a spectrum of discretion: individual, oligarchical, syndicalist, democratic. 3 – Distribution of control of property between rulers and citizens. 4 – Distribution of proceeds of the market between rulers and citizens. Capitalism (consumption), Socialism (commons production), Authoritarian(institutional production) 5 – Balance of Proceeds between consumption and commons and institutions.

  • THE CHOICES a) Rule (conflict resolution), b) Government(commons production), c)

    THE CHOICES

    a) Rule (conflict resolution),

    b) Government(commons production),

    c) Market(Consumption production)

    1 – Rule of Law vs Discretionary Rule

    2 – Production of commons by a spectrum of discretion: individual, oligarchical, syndicalist, democratic.

    3 – Distribution of control of property between rulers and citizens.

    4 – Distribution of proceeds of the market between rulers and citizens. Capitalism (consumption), Socialism (commons production), Authoritarian(institutional production)

    5 – Balance of Proceeds between consumption and commons and institutions.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 21:47:00 UTC

  • The Choices

    a) Rule (conflict resolution), b) Government(commons production), c) Market(Consumption production) 1 – Rule of Law vs Discretionary Rule 2 – Production of commons by a spectrum of discretion: individual, oligarchical, syndicalist, democratic. 3 – Distribution of control of property between rulers and citizens. 4 – Distribution of proceeds of the market between rulers and citizens. Capitalism (consumption), Socialism (commons production), Authoritarian(institutional production) 5 – Balance of Proceeds between consumption and commons and institutions.

  • The Militia: Deny Power To Any And All Other Than The Common Law.

    A warrior, soldier, militiaman have very different functions: Strike. Combined Arms. Territorial Denial. An aristocratic people require all three. And of them, the militia serves as the most important: to deny power to any and all other than the common law.

  • THE MILITIA: DENY POWER TO ANY AND ALL OTHER THAN THE COMMON LAW. A warrior, sol

    THE MILITIA: DENY POWER TO ANY AND ALL OTHER THAN THE COMMON LAW.

    A warrior, soldier, militiaman have very different functions: Strike. Combined Arms. Territorial Denial. An aristocratic people require all three. And of them, the militia serves as the most important: to deny power to any and all other than the common law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 13:34:00 UTC

  • The Militia: Deny Power To Any And All Other Than The Common Law.

    A warrior, soldier, militiaman have very different functions: Strike. Combined Arms. Territorial Denial. An aristocratic people require all three. And of them, the militia serves as the most important: to deny power to any and all other than the common law.

  • My Universe Scientific And Philosophical

    1 – Empiricist (scientist, naturalist) 2 – Operationalist (post-analytic[set] philosophy) 3 – Nomocratist (Rule of Law) 4 – Propertarian (Market Fascist) 5 – Monarchist (Judge of Last Resort) 6 – Pagan ( Universe, Nature, Ancestors, Nation, King[royal family] ) 7 – Ethnic Nationalist (Universal. For all peoples. Nations are markets that can fail.) ECONOMICS I view economic schools as class philosophies using various forms of pseudoscience. The underclasses need serfdom, the lower classes need socialism(managed labor), the middle classes need markets, the R&D people need subsidy, and the aristocratic people need to create socialism, markets, and rule of law that make both possible. These are just facts. Austrian economics = Jewish economics (favoring the lender at everyone’s expense.). Chicago economics = anglo rule of law economic (favoring the entrepreneur.) Possibly the best solution. Keynesian Economics = Marxism v2, favoring the laborer and consumer at the expense of the society and civilization. Everything else isn’t economics. The only economics consists of rule of law, and supply of institutions that serve the necessities of the demographic. IDEOLOGICAL (POLITICAL) 1 – Conservative (Aristocracy – Meritocracy. Tripartism.) 2 – Tripartarian (Inequality. The natural hierarchy of the prisoner/slave/serf, laboring/commercial/financial, legal/military, and scientific/philosophical classes.) 3 – Reactionary (Anti-Abrahamist. Every one of the enlightenment programs has failed in social science and politics, and has succeeded only in replacing the Abrahamic superstition, with Abrahamic Psuedo-science, and Institutionalized lying by gossip.)

  • Yes, If You Want And Need Socialism, We Want You To Have It.

    I agree. If you want a socialist, equalitarian, discretionary rules society you should create and live in a socialist discretionary rule society. I agree, if you want an aristocratic, meritocratic, rule of law society, then those of us who want that should live in an aristocratic society. So let’s just agree that the big sort is doing this for us anyway, and divide the country up along the obvious lines that exist by voting patterns, and then live in the societies we want. The order of europe was successful because it consisted of small, culturally homogenous states. So lets create a europe of north america and then we can stop fighting about it. Now, the only reason you can say ‘no’ is greed and oppression of one another. And if you want to do that then I’ guess the only solution is war.