Theme: Constitutional Order
-
Return To Rule By Rule Of Law, Markets In Everything, And The Continuous Evolution Of The Animal Man.
We are the masters of the first asset: violence. Violence like any asset can be put to good, or to ill. We can return to the continuous domestication and husbandry of humans, animals, machines, and this earth – if not the universe. And in doing so evolve ourselves and man into gods. Or we can be victims of those who lack that ability. -
RETURN TO RULE BY RULE OF LAW, MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, AND THE CONTINUOUS EVOLUTI
RETURN TO RULE BY RULE OF LAW, MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, AND THE CONTINUOUS EVOLUTION OF THE ANIMAL MAN.
We are the masters of the first asset: violence. Violence like any asset can be put to good, or to ill. We can return to the continuous domestication and husbandry of humans, animals, machines, and this earth – if not the universe. And in doing so evolve ourselves and man into gods. Or we can be victims of those who lack that ability.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 13:00:00 UTC
-
Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am
Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am) Arguments before the court are incorrect. There is a vast difference between personal conviction, small business between individuals, enterprise policy, and practical monopoly. There is no practical monopoly of cake bakers, there is no enterprise policy forcing interpersonal rejection, and so this is an interpersonal matter of a difference in ethics. I mean, I wouldn’t ask a jew to make a nazi cake. I just wouldn’t because that would VIOLATE RECIPROCITY. And I wouldn’t confuse my personal conviction with corporate policy, nor near monopoly policy depriving choice in a market, nor political policy determining rights under rule of law before the courts. I don’t let certain people service me in stores because I do not want to reward their manner of dress or speech or behavior, or ‘attire of separatism’. But I am happy to simply move on to someone else, and aside from utilities, I don’t see any commerce I can conduct that is a near monopoly. So this has been a travesty since the beginning. Voluntary Reciprocity provides the answer to everything. -
Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am
Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am) Arguments before the court are incorrect. There is a vast difference between personal conviction, small business between individuals, enterprise policy, and practical monopoly. There is no practical monopoly of cake bakers, there is no enterprise policy forcing interpersonal rejection, and so this is an interpersonal matter of a difference in ethics. I mean, I wouldn’t ask a jew to make a nazi cake. I just wouldn’t because that would VIOLATE RECIPROCITY. And I wouldn’t confuse my personal conviction with corporate policy, nor near monopoly policy depriving choice in a market, nor political policy determining rights under rule of law before the courts. I don’t let certain people service me in stores because I do not want to reward their manner of dress or speech or behavior, or ‘attire of separatism’. But I am happy to simply move on to someone else, and aside from utilities, I don’t see any commerce I can conduct that is a near monopoly. So this has been a travesty since the beginning. Voluntary Reciprocity provides the answer to everything. -
Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am
Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays.
(sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am)
Arguments before the court are incorrect. There is a vast difference between personal conviction, small business between individuals, enterprise policy, and practical monopoly.
There is no practical monopoly of cake bakers, there is no enterprise policy forcing interpersonal rejection, and so this is an interpersonal matter of a difference in ethics.
I mean, I wouldn’t ask a jew to make a nazi cake. I just wouldn’t because that would VIOLATE RECIPROCITY.
And I wouldn’t confuse my personal conviction with corporate policy, nor near monopoly policy depriving choice in a market, nor political policy determining rights under rule of law before the courts.
I don’t let certain people service me in stores because I do not want to reward their manner of dress or speech or behavior, or ‘attire of separatism’. But I am happy to simply move on to someone else, and aside from utilities, I don’t see any commerce I can conduct that is a near monopoly.
So this has been a travesty since the beginning.
Voluntary Reciprocity provides the answer to everything.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 02:45:00 UTC
-
Transcending The Liberal Order
(bit of brilliance here that few will ever reach) by Joel Davis It’s funny how once I fully realised that you have completed the Enlightenment and taken Liberalism to its’ logical end, I simultaneously realised that you have stripped Liberalism of all its’ (faux-)sacredness around which we have all been culturally conditioned. You would undoubtedly take that as a compliment, yet ironically, that is precisely what alienated me from your ideology. Once I was fully deprogrammed and transcended the Liberal axia upon which our culture is built, I stopped measuring in the units of individualism and instead became focused on socio-cultural systems as entities themselves. We all experience identification with socio-cultural systems which transcend our individuality, and as individuals are culturally disciplined, they progressively lose their individuality into shared identity. You could explain this merely with evolutionary psychology if you want, but we can also map out the structure of how this functions on the experiential level, and as that is the level at we directly experience this phenomena, it seems far more interesting to me. So yes, we can measure it at the marginalist-Darwinian level, but we can also measure it at the psycholinguistic-aesthetic level. Just because the psycholinguistic-aesthetic level is harder to falsify, it doesn’t make it any less real, it just makes it a more challenging domain. (Curt: You see, I don’t have to produce the next generation of thought, I just have to END THE PRISON of this generation of thought. If I could help bring about 1000 people like Joel, can you imagine what would come of it?????) -
Transcending The Liberal Order
(bit of brilliance here that few will ever reach) by Joel Davis It’s funny how once I fully realised that you have completed the Enlightenment and taken Liberalism to its’ logical end, I simultaneously realised that you have stripped Liberalism of all its’ (faux-)sacredness around which we have all been culturally conditioned. You would undoubtedly take that as a compliment, yet ironically, that is precisely what alienated me from your ideology. Once I was fully deprogrammed and transcended the Liberal axia upon which our culture is built, I stopped measuring in the units of individualism and instead became focused on socio-cultural systems as entities themselves. We all experience identification with socio-cultural systems which transcend our individuality, and as individuals are culturally disciplined, they progressively lose their individuality into shared identity. You could explain this merely with evolutionary psychology if you want, but we can also map out the structure of how this functions on the experiential level, and as that is the level at we directly experience this phenomena, it seems far more interesting to me. So yes, we can measure it at the marginalist-Darwinian level, but we can also measure it at the psycholinguistic-aesthetic level. Just because the psycholinguistic-aesthetic level is harder to falsify, it doesn’t make it any less real, it just makes it a more challenging domain. (Curt: You see, I don’t have to produce the next generation of thought, I just have to END THE PRISON of this generation of thought. If I could help bring about 1000 people like Joel, can you imagine what would come of it?????) -
TRANSCENDING THE LIBERAL ORDER (bit of brilliance here that few will ever reach)
TRANSCENDING THE LIBERAL ORDER
(bit of brilliance here that few will ever reach)
by Joel Davis
It’s funny how once I fully realised that you have completed the Enlightenment and taken Liberalism to its’ logical end, I simultaneously realised that you have stripped Liberalism of all its’ (faux-)sacredness around which we have all been culturally conditioned.
You would undoubtedly take that as a compliment, yet ironically, that is precisely what alienated me from your ideology.
Once I was fully deprogrammed and transcended the Liberal axia upon which our culture is built, I stopped measuring in the units of individualism and instead became focused on socio-cultural systems as entities themselves.
We all experience identification with socio-cultural systems which transcend our individuality, and as individuals are culturally disciplined, they progressively lose their individuality into shared identity.
You could explain this merely with evolutionary psychology if you want, but we can also map out the structure of how this functions on the experiential level, and as that is the level at we directly experience this phenomena, it seems far more interesting to me.
So yes, we can measure it at the marginalist-Darwinian level, but we can also measure it at the psycholinguistic-aesthetic level.
Just because the psycholinguistic-aesthetic level is harder to falsify, it doesn’t make it any less real, it just makes it a more challenging domain.
(Curt: You see, I don’t have to produce the next generation of thought, I just have to END THE PRISON of this generation of thought. If I could help bring about 1000 people like Joel, can you imagine what would come of it?????)
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 00:45:00 UTC
-
Women Are Not Capable Of Rule Of Rule Of Law
“Two of the nine justices — Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor — dissented.” -
Women Are Not Capable Of Rule Of Rule Of Law
“Two of the nine justices — Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor — dissented.”