Theme: Constitutional Order

  • Yes its good if your people obtained english administration, law, accounting, an

    Yes its good if your people obtained english administration, law, accounting, and language during colonialism. Just don’t buy this democracy stuff (sh-t). No matter what it takes, train a militia (army) by breaking men down and building them up as a team, so that they have as much allegiance to the militia (each other) as they do the family and clan. Then work on building ordinary common property rights and law (with severity), and pushing that up into the government by means of courts and militia. Create markets, and a government that builds markets and markets alone.

    This whole democracy nonsense has been a catastrophe.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 13:52:00 UTC

  • The Only Solution Is Rule of Law (A Priesthood Of Judges)

    Also: The problem for sub saharan africa (and for most of the world) is (a) the tradition of stealing on behalf of your family tribe and clan, and (b) the expression of this tradition in *corruption*. The only fix for corruption is not to demand good people (they don’t exist) but to create good judges. If you demand uncorrupt judges (and kill them if they are not uncorrupt), the judges will prosecute politicians. Until you have an army or police force, and a judiciary that is paid enough that corruption is not ‘valuable’, then it does not matter what government you have. step 1. soldiers who protect the people. step 2. judges who are not corrupt step 3. police (or soldiers) who will enforce the judge’s rule. It is cheaper to create highly paid police and judges than to create a highly paid military. The world is very simple if we stop trying to find good men, and instead, punish people who are bad – leaving only good people able to work in government. Ukraine has the same problem. Every poor country has the same problem. Westerners do not have this problem because we were always a militia – meaning all men fight. This is the secret to western successes. It all begins with our militia.

  • The Only Solution Is Rule of Law (A Priesthood Of Judges)

    Also: The problem for sub saharan africa (and for most of the world) is (a) the tradition of stealing on behalf of your family tribe and clan, and (b) the expression of this tradition in *corruption*. The only fix for corruption is not to demand good people (they don’t exist) but to create good judges. If you demand uncorrupt judges (and kill them if they are not uncorrupt), the judges will prosecute politicians. Until you have an army or police force, and a judiciary that is paid enough that corruption is not ‘valuable’, then it does not matter what government you have. step 1. soldiers who protect the people. step 2. judges who are not corrupt step 3. police (or soldiers) who will enforce the judge’s rule. It is cheaper to create highly paid police and judges than to create a highly paid military. The world is very simple if we stop trying to find good men, and instead, punish people who are bad – leaving only good people able to work in government. Ukraine has the same problem. Every poor country has the same problem. Westerners do not have this problem because we were always a militia – meaning all men fight. This is the secret to western successes. It all begins with our militia.

  • End (((Their))) Influence

    Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.

  • End (((Their))) Influence

    Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.

  • Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never su

    Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 10:28:00 UTC

  • That’s not quite right. When I use ‘common law’ I refer to the common law of tor

    That’s not quite right. When I use ‘common law’ I refer to the common law of tort, or ‘natural law’. The roman system had to impose rule on others so they converted the via-negativa of the common law of tort into two tiers, and stated it via-positiva to limit jurists.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-12 23:07:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/984568692460662784

    Reply addressees: @Eric_Eibergen @TheAustrian_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/984564916987351040


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/984564916987351040

  • No, the Etruscan gods were the same as the nordic, The Roman laws continued the

    No, the Etruscan gods were the same as the nordic, The Roman laws continued the germanic laws, because the romans “Itals” were Danubian people. The Roman laws were WRITTEN and a continuation of those germanic laws. The Germanics did not tolerate capital punishment.That was Rome.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 15:35:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983367764378308609

    Reply addressees: @TheAustrian_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983366533186576385


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983366533186576385

  • Nope. The “Germanization” of Christianity was the product of our common law trad

    Nope. The “Germanization” of Christianity was the product of our common law traditions. The ancient trajectory from the Yamna, to the Corded Ware, to the southern migration of those people as conquerors of the Mediterranean, to the Vikings Hansa, and Age of Sail : ONE continuity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 15:25:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983365281455198209

    Reply addressees: @TheAustrian_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983364240332468225


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983364240332468225

  • Laws Not Religions Determine Your People – Religion Is Decoration That Helps or Hurts It

    No. Our common-law tradition and the militia built the west. We escaped Abrahamic religion, and immediately restored our ancient trajectory. The reason for degeneracy is the reintroduction of Abrahamic Religion in pseudoscientific (marxist) and peudorational (postmodernist) prose Nope. The “Germanization” of Christianity was the product of our common law traditions. The ancient trajectory from the Yamna, to the Corded Ware, to the southern migration of those people as conquerors of the Mediterranean, to the Vikings Hansa, and Age of Sail : ONE continuity.