Theme: Constitutional Order

  • “A man may not prosecute a woman, and a woman may not prosecute a man.”

    “A man may not prosecute a woman, and a woman may not prosecute a man.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 19:12:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/03/31/florida-high-school-students-walk-out-guns-second-amendment/475486002/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-29 22:01:00 UTC

  • Um. You don’t understand. Law must be constructed in the context of the individu

    Um. You don’t understand.

    Law must be constructed in the context of the individual, because only individual crimes are decidable.

    But legislation, or what we call Policy, because it is only as families we have common interests.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-29 20:45:00 UTC

  • THE GREAT AMERICAN LIE by Bill Joslin and Curt Doolittle by Bill Joslin: Jeffers

    THE GREAT AMERICAN LIE

    by Bill Joslin and Curt Doolittle

    by Bill Joslin:

    Jefferson lied.

    The American sentiment of democracy and it’s failure to ensure it’s value is passed down stems from good and true ideas being propted-up by lies.

    Stop lying!

    You are ruled (democracy is NOT the will of the.people) and voting prevents the necessity for violent revolution to purify power.

    A generation before, in England, the noble franchise was expanded to all land holders for one reason only – one last peaceful step before violent revolution.

    American founding fathers were the grandchildren of UK parliamentarians who lost their moral footing due to Cromwell.

    The founding fathers didn’t innovate these ideas as much as refined the argumentation for granddaddy’s wisdom. And they appealed to.morality and religion to do so.

    Now it is failing. Not because the ideas were wrong, but rather because the argumentation was baseless.

    Fix this.

    (Curt has. so advocate for his work to correct your way of life)

    ——-

    by Curt Doolittle

    This argument has been stated as:

    1) The value of democracy is limited to the the via-negativa: throwing the corrupt out (disbanding parliament) by peaceful means of transition.

    2) A republic can choose priorities among a people with common interests, but only markets can choose preferences between people with dissimilar interests.

    3) Majoritarian democracy serves as a monopoly that only increases frustrations between people with dissimilar intersets, as the majority gradually oppresses the minority.

    4) The English “aristocracy of everyone” was merely an excuse for seizing political power from the aristocracy by forcing a supermajority, rather than constructing an exchange, and adding even lower houses of parliament. they created a monopoly from a market between the classes.

    5) The americans created a constitution of natural law by using a house of equal regional aristocracy(senate), and proportional regional property owners (middle class house), only exacerbating the problem. This experiment was a ‘third way’ that sought to restore anglo saxon rule of law (contractualism) among the militia.

    6) The americans iteratively bypassed the state aristocracies by direct voting for the senate, and extended enfranchisement rather than creating a single house. in this sense they attempted to create a monopoly (homogeneous) democracy with the senate mediating differences between states. This served to transfer power to the federal government and away from the states. had this power been limited to exclude all normative, traditional, familial behavior that would have enabled insurer of last resort functions, but instead large immigrant states dominated the others, creating the past and current conflicts.

    7) All of these factors violate the anglo < germanic < aryan reason for european historical successes, which were dependent upon the preservation of individual sovereignty under natural law of tort (property), and individual warranty through service and economic liability, and the use of markets in everything for the purpose of decidability.

    8) The family does scale. There is no limit to Militia <- Military <-King-> judiciary -> parliament(thang) -> people, as long as voluntary association, disassociation are available.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 10:18:00 UTC

  • The Western Cult Is Sovereignty and Law

    TO TALEB (THE WESTERN CULT IS SOVEREIGNTY AND LAW) (possibly important post for followers) Replying to @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you switch from discourse under colloquial, rhetorical, propter-hoc, low trust, heterogeneous, bazaars, to scientific post-hoc, high trust, homogenous, rule-of-law ‘markets’ proper. Nassim: b) I’ve watched you slowly move this direction, but I haven’t seen you include the fact that western civ and all it’s +/-‘s are the result of the primacy of sovereignty and reciprocity in the traditional law back into oral (pre-)history. Nassim: c) And so, my reading of history, is that the aristocracy was taught to rule (meaning decide, not direct), and the nobility to govern (direct), and labor to obey. (Indo European Tripartism). Otherwise I’m certain your positioning of the ‘Doctrine’ vs ‘Techne’ is correct. Nassim: d) So my read is the law is taught as a craft (practiced) and the ‘liberal arts” are taught as doctrines, and we are wasting a phenomenal amount of money not separating Techne(craft), Religion(obedience), and Law(Rule). Meaning the problem is the Academy (secular church). Nassim e: (Closing) So my intuition is that we all carry our cultures with us and possibly to some degree in our genes, and that this cultural difference is what you are intuiting, but expressing in literary, rational, and mathematical rather than western (legal,scientific) form.

  • The Western Cult Is Sovereignty and Law

    TO TALEB (THE WESTERN CULT IS SOVEREIGNTY AND LAW) (possibly important post for followers) Replying to @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you switch from discourse under colloquial, rhetorical, propter-hoc, low trust, heterogeneous, bazaars, to scientific post-hoc, high trust, homogenous, rule-of-law ‘markets’ proper. Nassim: b) I’ve watched you slowly move this direction, but I haven’t seen you include the fact that western civ and all it’s +/-‘s are the result of the primacy of sovereignty and reciprocity in the traditional law back into oral (pre-)history. Nassim: c) And so, my reading of history, is that the aristocracy was taught to rule (meaning decide, not direct), and the nobility to govern (direct), and labor to obey. (Indo European Tripartism). Otherwise I’m certain your positioning of the ‘Doctrine’ vs ‘Techne’ is correct. Nassim: d) So my read is the law is taught as a craft (practiced) and the ‘liberal arts” are taught as doctrines, and we are wasting a phenomenal amount of money not separating Techne(craft), Religion(obedience), and Law(Rule). Meaning the problem is the Academy (secular church). Nassim e: (Closing) So my intuition is that we all carry our cultures with us and possibly to some degree in our genes, and that this cultural difference is what you are intuiting, but expressing in literary, rational, and mathematical rather than western (legal,scientific) form.

  • The Experiment Failed.

    –“I never understood how letting everyone vote is a good thing”–Peter Sorrentino Well, I think originally jefferson’s idea was that being as inclusive as possible decreased the chances of concentrating power. Universal white males in 1856 White women in 1920 Minorities in 1965. So you can see what happens rather rapidly. The experiment has been a failure. We just need to rule. Return to rule for money and profit. 😉 Militia > King (General) > Judge > Sheriff > Family > Individual.

  • “I never understood how letting everyone vote is a good thing”–Peter Sorrentino

    –“I never understood how letting everyone vote is a good thing”–Peter Sorrentino

    Well, I think originally jefferson’s idea was that being as inclusive as possible decreased the chances of concentrating power.

    Universal white males in 1856

    White women in 1920

    Minorities in 1965.

    So you can see what happens rather rapidly.

    The experiment has been a failure.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 16:03:00 UTC

  • We just need to rule. The experiment failed. Return to rule for money and profit

    We just need to rule. The experiment failed.

    Return to rule for money and profit. 😉

    Militia > King (General) > Judge > Sheriff > Family > Individual.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 15:41:00 UTC

  • TO TALEB (THE WESTERN CULT IS SOVEREIGNTY AND LAW) (possibly important post for

    TO TALEB (THE WESTERN CULT IS SOVEREIGNTY AND LAW)

    (possibly important post for followers)

    Replying to @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen

    Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you switch from discourse under colloquial, rhetorical, propter-hoc, low trust, heterogeneous, bazaars, to scientific post-hoc, high trust, homogenous, rule-of-law ‘markets’ proper.

    Nassim: b) I’ve watched you slowly move this direction, but I haven’t seen you include the fact that western civ and all it’s +/-‘s are the result of the primacy of sovereignty and reciprocity in the traditional law back into oral (pre-)history.

    Nassim: c) And so, my reading of history, is that the aristocracy was taught to rule (meaning decide, not direct), and the nobility to govern (direct), and labor to obey. (Indo European Tripartism). Otherwise I’m certain your positioning of the ‘Doctrine’ vs ‘Techne’ is correct.

    Nassim: d) So my read is the law is taught as a craft (practiced) and the ‘liberal arts” are taught as doctrines, and we are wasting a phenomenal amount of money not separating Techne(craft), Religion(obedience), and Law(Rule). Meaning the problem is the Academy (secular church).

    Nassim e: (Closing) So my intuition is that we all carry our cultures with us and possibly to some degree in our genes, and that this cultural difference is what you are intuiting, but expressing in literary, rational, and mathematical rather than western (legal,scientific) form.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 10:45:00 UTC