Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • What’s Posse Comitatus

    WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?
    —“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—

  • “Absolutism asserts a preference as a good and then justifies that preference wi

    —-“Absolutism asserts a preference as a good and then justifies that preference with facts (fits the world around the individual). Scientific law of Tort models the social world. With this knowledge, the polity asserts its good in the name of the state, and the individuals assert their will to power within those limits for fear of punishment.”—Nick “Rosenthal”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 07:50:00 UTC

  • Elections – Well, Time to End Them.

    1) A rotating system of individual elections is far easier to manipulate since forces (coercion) can be concentrated on one election at a time, where under simultaneous voting, it is extremely difficult to coerce every race without nearly infinite funds. 2) With the advent of communication there is no reason for representatives any longer, whatsoever, nor for the houses of congress. There is every reason for either devolution of all power to the states, or direct democracy (equidistribution) or direct proportional democracy (by contribution). [There isn’t any reason for one single currency for all purposes any longer either. Nor is there any reason for distribution of liquidity through the financial sector and the credit system. In fact, that’s the source of the economic problem we face today.] 3) Because it it is far too easy to influence politicians whether they are elected incrementally, through rotation en mass (as now), or all at once (in the athenian method). 4) The purpose of scale whether at the jury, state representative, or federal representative level, is to increase the cost of bribery. Ergo it is time, given our wealth, to increase scale from representatives to the entire populace, since that bribery is impossible for OTHER than the state. (As for ‘comparison of legislatures to juries, the evolution of the legislature being Thang 12, 20, 100, or more, depending on the severity of the matter) > The Jury > Senate > Multiple Houses > Direct Democracy, is … well you’d have to be relatively ignorant of the origin of the western tradition and its roots in the sovereignty of individual men, leaving the Thang (Jury) as the ONLY POSSIBLE means of choice, and the Headman, Chieftain, King, Monarch, as a Judge of Last Resort.) Cheers

  • The Final Word on Political Orders. Period.

    [E]thnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, with Nationalism under Monarchy the optimum Religion, and Rule of Law by Natural Law the optimum form of rule, and the choice of government that produces preferred commons dependent upon the condition of competition or war (Authoritarian), Prosperity and Safety (Jury), or Windfalls from Conquest or Invention (Meritocratic Democracy). There is no superior method of organizing people than by ethnocentricity, nationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity truth, duty, markets in everything, with Monarch as the judge of last resort, the militia of able men as the shareholders in the polity and its commons, defending all of of the above against all competitors or usurpers. The purpose of the militia is to deny power to alter the ethnocentric, nationalist, rule of law, hierarchical, market government, and the people who prosper under it. Period. Every alternative is but an attempt to conquer our people and end them. Therefore any and every contrary display word or deed, is an act of theft, war, genocide against our people and shall be reciprocated immediately. Therefore, this is the LAW OF OUR PEOPLE. …fin…

  • The Final Word on Political Orders. Period.

    [E]thnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, with Nationalism under Monarchy the optimum Religion, and Rule of Law by Natural Law the optimum form of rule, and the choice of government that produces preferred commons dependent upon the condition of competition or war (Authoritarian), Prosperity and Safety (Jury), or Windfalls from Conquest or Invention (Meritocratic Democracy). There is no superior method of organizing people than by ethnocentricity, nationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity truth, duty, markets in everything, with Monarch as the judge of last resort, the militia of able men as the shareholders in the polity and its commons, defending all of of the above against all competitors or usurpers. The purpose of the militia is to deny power to alter the ethnocentric, nationalist, rule of law, hierarchical, market government, and the people who prosper under it. Period. Every alternative is but an attempt to conquer our people and end them. Therefore any and every contrary display word or deed, is an act of theft, war, genocide against our people and shall be reciprocated immediately. Therefore, this is the LAW OF OUR PEOPLE. …fin…

  • Um. The muslims do it right. the jews do it right. and we did it right, before t

    Um. The muslims do it right. the jews do it right. and we did it right, before the church. there is nothing except the concentsus of the law, whether it aryan, jewish, or muslim, it was only the christians that used their law as violence upon a people through hierarchy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 18:16:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058422580045103105

    Reply addressees: @dagmar_schmitt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058422095896436736

    IN REPLY TO:

    @GudistGrug

    @curtdoolittle Do you see any important differences between the Orthodox church (bishops subject to the imperium) and the Catholic (kings subject to the pope)?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058422095896436736

  • THE FINAL WORD ON POLITICAL ORDERS Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutiona

    THE FINAL WORD ON POLITICAL ORDERS

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, with Nationalism under Monarchy the optimum Religion, and Rule of Law by Natural Law the optimum form of rule, and the choice of government that produces preferred commons dependent upon the condition of competition or war (Authoritarian), Prosperity and Safety (Jury), or Windfalls from Conquest or Invention (Meritocratic Democracy). There is no superior method of organizing people than by ethnocentricity, nationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity truth, duty, markets in everything, with Monarch as the judge of last resort, the militia of able men as the shareholders in the polity and its commons, defending all of of the above against all competitors or usurpers. The purpose of the militia is to deny power to alter the ethnocentric, nationalist, rule of law, hierarchical, market government, and the people who prosper under it.

    Period.

    Every alternative is but an attempt to conquer our people and end them. Therefore any and every contrary display word or deed, is an act of theft, war, genocide against our people and shall be reciprocated immediately.

    Therefore, this is the LAW OF OUR PEOPLE.

    …fin…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 12:29:00 UTC

  • ELECTIONS – WELL, TIME TO END THEM. 1) A rotating system of individual elections

    ELECTIONS – WELL, TIME TO END THEM.

    1) A rotating system of individual elections is far easier to manipulate since forces (coercion) can be concentrated on one election at a time, where under simultaneous voting, it is extremely difficult to coerce every race without nearly infinite funds.

    2) With the advent of communication there is no reason for representatives any longer, whatsoever, nor for the houses of congress. There is every reason for either devolution of all power to the states, or direct democracy (equidistribution) or direct proportional democracy (by contribution). [There isn’t any reason for one single currency for all purposes any longer either. Nor is there any reason for distribution of liquidity through the financial sector and the credit system. In fact, that’s the source of the economic problem we face today.]

    3) Because it it is far too easy to influence politicians whether they are elected incrementally, through rotation en mass (as now), or all at once (in the athenian method).

    4) The purpose of scale whether at the jury, state representative, or federal representative level, is to increase the cost of bribery.

    Ergo it is time, given our wealth, to increase scale from representatives to the entire populace, since that bribery is impossible for OTHER than the state.

    (As for ‘comparison of legislatures to juries, the evolution of the legislature being Thang 12, 20, 100, or more, depending on the severity of the matter) > The Jury > Senate > Multiple Houses > Direct Democracy, is … well you’d have to be relatively ignorant of the origin of the western tradition and its roots in the sovereignty of individual men, leaving the Thang (Jury) as the ONLY POSSIBLE means of choice, and the Headman, Chieftain, King, Monarch, as a Judge of Last Resort.)

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 07:49:00 UTC

  • Propertarian Government?

    (FB Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN GOVERNMENT LIBERTY, RULE OF LAW, AND THE OPTIONS FOR GOVERNANCE: PRODUCTION OF COMMONS [L]iberty as far as I know refers to the condition produced by rule of law rather than rule by man. The principal problem with rule of law has been the means of decidability as to the scope of the law. This is why libertarianism failed – it does not define the scope of the law objectively and empirically rather than subjectively and preferentially. In the west this refers to reciprocity both between members, between members and the government, and between governments(international). However, commons must be produced since it is by commons the west outpaced (rapidly) the rest, in the bronze, iron and finally steel ages. We invented the corporation precisely because we have been practicing it for thousands of years – particularly since 700ad under bipartite manorialism (the agrarian corporation). Once the question of the limit of law is defined as reciprocity, the only question then refers to who and how the polity decides to choose which commons to produce that is in the interest of everyone in the hierarchy. A judge of last resort can choose the commons (monarchy). The monarch can choose the commons and then have another ‘house’ approve or not the appropriation of funds. Or a house can choose the commons and the people approve the appropriations, and the monarch (judge of last resort) hold veto. Or the people can choose the commons and then approve the appropriations for those commons, with a house, monarch, or judiciary veto those commons and appropriations. History appears to suggest that monarchs that must obtain permission from industry and the public in order to appropriate the necessary funds, produces the superior set of outcomes. And this is the lesson of the 20th century, and the reason for the systemic failure of democracy – even in the west. Not that we needed to repeat the lesson since it has been known since the ancient era, that democracy was the worst of all possible options. But because democracy coincided with the returns on the second industrial revolution (germany), from which our 20th century wealth arose, the state, academy, media complex has claimed this was due to democracy rather than democracy has brought that wealth to an end through redistribution of reproduction, destroying what that industrial revolution depended upon: the ‘white’ laboring, working, and middle classes – which are the only high trust such classes in the world outside of japan and korea. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Propertarian Government?

    (FB Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN GOVERNMENT LIBERTY, RULE OF LAW, AND THE OPTIONS FOR GOVERNANCE: PRODUCTION OF COMMONS [L]iberty as far as I know refers to the condition produced by rule of law rather than rule by man. The principal problem with rule of law has been the means of decidability as to the scope of the law. This is why libertarianism failed – it does not define the scope of the law objectively and empirically rather than subjectively and preferentially. In the west this refers to reciprocity both between members, between members and the government, and between governments(international). However, commons must be produced since it is by commons the west outpaced (rapidly) the rest, in the bronze, iron and finally steel ages. We invented the corporation precisely because we have been practicing it for thousands of years – particularly since 700ad under bipartite manorialism (the agrarian corporation). Once the question of the limit of law is defined as reciprocity, the only question then refers to who and how the polity decides to choose which commons to produce that is in the interest of everyone in the hierarchy. A judge of last resort can choose the commons (monarchy). The monarch can choose the commons and then have another ‘house’ approve or not the appropriation of funds. Or a house can choose the commons and the people approve the appropriations, and the monarch (judge of last resort) hold veto. Or the people can choose the commons and then approve the appropriations for those commons, with a house, monarch, or judiciary veto those commons and appropriations. History appears to suggest that monarchs that must obtain permission from industry and the public in order to appropriate the necessary funds, produces the superior set of outcomes. And this is the lesson of the 20th century, and the reason for the systemic failure of democracy – even in the west. Not that we needed to repeat the lesson since it has been known since the ancient era, that democracy was the worst of all possible options. But because democracy coincided with the returns on the second industrial revolution (germany), from which our 20th century wealth arose, the state, academy, media complex has claimed this was due to democracy rather than democracy has brought that wealth to an end through redistribution of reproduction, destroying what that industrial revolution depended upon: the ‘white’ laboring, working, and middle classes – which are the only high trust such classes in the world outside of japan and korea. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine