Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • Because the law says I can’t cross that line. I can talk about how a revolution

    Because the law says I can’t cross that line. I can talk about how a revolution will play out and how I think it will be successful, and what tactics I think will be used. I can state the demands. But crossing the line in to advocating violence is a crime.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 20:28:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060630132900151296

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060625687084711936

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060625687084711936

  • Well, revolutions are against the government to alter powers, civil wars between

    Well, revolutions are against the government to alter powers, civil wars between factions for control of power, and wars of secession means of separation.
    In this case we pursue revolution first, then secession second if revolution fails, and civil war third if secession fails,

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 12:50:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060514833840381953

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060511593384079361

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060511593384079361

  • “TRUMP OPENS THE DOOR TO NATURAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE: A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE BIRT

    “TRUMP OPENS THE DOOR TO NATURAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE: A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE BIRTHRIGHT MANOEUVRE

    By Zachary Miller, Esq.

    The drafter of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was Jacob Howard, a Senator from Michigan. On the floor of the U.S. Senate in 1866, Sen. Howard said this of his intent regarding that amendment’s Citizenship Clause:

    “THE AMENDMENT Which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of ***natural law*** and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.”

    Of course, the currently dominant Scalian originalist legal philosophy does not extend to the contemplation of the intent of the drafter of an amendment; it stops short at the plain language of the document. Trump’s maneuver here is to ask the Supreme Court to go beyond originalism and inquire into Senator Howard’s intent when he drafted the amendment. And if successful, the result will be nothing less than the explicit enshrinement by the United States Supreme Court of the great and ancient natural law into American Constitutional Jurisprudence.” – Zachary Miller

    (via Brandon Hayes )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 07:01:00 UTC

  • Rump Opens the Door to Natural Law Jurisprudence:

    “TRUMP OPENS THE DOOR TO NATURAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE: A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE BIRTHRIGHT MANOEUVRE By Zachary Miller, Esq. The drafter of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was Jacob Howard, a Senator from Michigan. On the floor of the U.S. Senate in 1866, Sen. Howard said this of his intent regarding that amendment’s Citizenship Clause: “THE AMENDMENT Which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.” Of course, the currently dominant Scalian originalist legal philosophy does not extend to the contemplation of the intent of the drafter of an amendment; it stops short at the plain language of the document. Trump’s maneuver here is to ask the Supreme Court to go beyond originalism and inquire into Senator Howard’s intent when he drafted the amendment. And if successful, the result will be nothing less than the explicit enshrinement by the United States Supreme Court of the great and ancient natural law into American Constitutional Jurisprudence.” – Zachary Miller (via Brandon Hayes )

  • Rump Opens the Door to Natural Law Jurisprudence:

    “TRUMP OPENS THE DOOR TO NATURAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE: A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE BIRTHRIGHT MANOEUVRE By Zachary Miller, Esq. The drafter of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was Jacob Howard, a Senator from Michigan. On the floor of the U.S. Senate in 1866, Sen. Howard said this of his intent regarding that amendment’s Citizenship Clause: “THE AMENDMENT Which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.” Of course, the currently dominant Scalian originalist legal philosophy does not extend to the contemplation of the intent of the drafter of an amendment; it stops short at the plain language of the document. Trump’s maneuver here is to ask the Supreme Court to go beyond originalism and inquire into Senator Howard’s intent when he drafted the amendment. And if successful, the result will be nothing less than the explicit enshrinement by the United States Supreme Court of the great and ancient natural law into American Constitutional Jurisprudence.” – Zachary Miller (via Brandon Hayes )

  • WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS? —“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the

    WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?
    —“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 23:09:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059945842256343040

  • WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS? —“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the

    WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?

    —“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 18:08:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45579976_10156760313962264_609537406

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45579976_10156760313962264_6095374061284622336_o_10156760313952264.jpg UM. NOT JUST SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE….

    One Tweak: Western Civilization has built in MARKETS in EVERYTHING, including family (morals), commerce (norms), state (law), academy(philosophy), and church (theology). Separation of CHURCH and STATE preceded christianity.Connor CreeganI like Nassim, but I don’t find his defense of his Orthodox Christianity (particularly as stated in SitG) to be all that compelling beyond his personal behavior-based practice. That said, I don’t think he intends to make the case for anyone to “be” Christian other than himself.Nov 7, 2018, 10:02 AMConnor CreeganBut yeah big agree, the secular state predated Christianity, and Christian secular states are more or less incidental. Being a student of Greek he should know better.Nov 7, 2018, 10:05 AMUM. NOT JUST SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE….

    One Tweak: Western Civilization has built in MARKETS in EVERYTHING, including family (morals), commerce (norms), state (law), academy(philosophy), and church (theology). Separation of CHURCH and STATE preceded christianity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 13:36:00 UTC

  • What’s Posse Comitatus

    WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?
    —“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—

  • Sovereignty: Innovation in Ukraine

    (FB 1541529692 Timestamp) SOVEREIGNTY: INNOVATION IN UKRAINE
    (The Strategy for Christendom)
    by Igor Surkanov Ukraine is adopting an ideal model to spread across the west.
    The Dual militia system One is smaller and more ideological, and the other larger and under the state and political. But the smaller one organizes for the young and creates leaders for all three orgs. State, army, national guard. (genius)