@realDonaldTrump RE: GUNS, 1) only background checks, 2) Only with online data, 3) only when the system is live, 3) Only in exchange for (a) national carry, (b) ending immigration, and the wall. WHY? The result will be an end to this government because it’s a line in the sand.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-08 23:50:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159612852069654530
Maybe. I’ve grown organically and I don’t know if I want to grow by association to anything other than rule of law. I’m thinking of it. But not sure.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 19:51:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159190310309830657
Reply addressees: @MaMo_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159182432341508096
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159182432341508096
You mean, YOU want a DIFFERENT constitutional crisis by reversing the will of the people, and thereby demonstrating that there is no law settled matter, no vote meaningful, no legislation durable, no rule of law, and subject to party whim and will? Dictatorship?
NO MORE LIES!
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 18:32:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159170538931216385
Reply addressees: @thomasbrake @BorisJohnson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158827049643139074
IN REPLY TO:
@thomasbrake
By threatening to disregard votes in parliament @BorisJohnson is leading our country towards a full-blown constitutional crisis
There is a word for a prime minister who dismisses parliamentary democracy – a dictator
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158827049643139074
Bill, that’s a sophism. It’s empirically false in all civilizations in all eras, across all time – weapons of parity with the army are the only insurance of liberty. That’s why the oldest governments are Anglo (anglo saxon norman). Because the state depended upon the militia.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 17:19:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159152105346752512
Reply addressees: @mitchellvii
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159134663568441344
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159134663568441344
THE ONLY GUN CONTROL YOU’LL GET IS IN TRADE
@mitchellvii
Bait your clicks if you want but it won’t go anywhere. If it did there would be 2M guys in DC and the place would burn to the ground. Deal with it. Solve the problem of immigration. Solve the problem of high school mental illness. Issue national right to carry w fed BG checks.
Otherwise your misinterpretation of these events as crimes will be rapidly reformed by reinterpretation that they are fringe expressions of a fomenting civil war that while boiling under the surface will turn horrific at the next election (either way) or at the next correction.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:58:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576287215545186
DIfferences
European Monarchist (Under Traditional Rule of Law),
… Classical(Representatives in Houses for Classes),
… … Social Democrat(Parties),
… … … Socialist(Bureaucracy),
… … … … Communist(Bureaucratic Dictatorships),
… … … … … Fascist(National Dictator),
Rule on Natural Law Rule by Discretion
Markets Monopoly
Meritocracy Politocracy
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:54:04 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576268521701308
@Southern_Gentry@Alba_Rising@altrightsheriff
I’m doing it.
A moral license
A set of demands (a constitution)
A plan of transition
A means of insurrection
You think running out into the fray is how to win? Are you confirming you’re a useful idiot? you BUILD a revolution, and you RAISE an army, and you CONDUCT a war.
You don’t rage-quit you idiot.
Grow the fuck up. Man up. Show up. Follow. Fight. Together.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 11:28:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102569798672192874
Lastly, the issue isn’t so much immigration as non-integration, and the threat of undermining the american experiment in a ‘third way’ (middle class society) continuing the anglo tradition of sovereignty. We don’t want to go thru what others have gone thru: destruction.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 23:10:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158515556510838787
Reply addressees: @theThiagoCortes @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158515238603501568
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@theThiagoCortes @JohnMarkSays (FYI: conservatism includes a high disgust response, and there are irrational people. However, as a matter of Natural Law, preference is preference, and it’s voluntary exchange, and as such sanctioned under the law.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158515238603501568
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@theThiagoCortes @JohnMarkSays (FYI: conservatism includes a high disgust response, and there are irrational people. However, as a matter of Natural Law, preference is preference, and it’s voluntary exchange, and as such sanctioned under the law.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158515238603501568
And that we can restore our Constitution to its origins in Natural Law of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth and duty, heroism and excellence, jury and markets, and increase the suppression of fraud from the commercial to the public sphere to end the industrialization of lying…
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 17:57:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158436863310532609
Reply addressees: @bog_beef @FriedrichHayek @liz_franczak
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158436239885950976
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bog_beef @FriedrichHayek @liz_franczak And that abrahamic lying (False promise of equality, the sophisms of Pilpul and Critique, and the fawning of undue praise) were modernized from supernatural to pseudoscientific, then sophistry, then outright denial, in Authoritarian Marxism-Socialism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158436239885950976
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@bog_beef @FriedrichHayek @liz_franczak And that abrahamic lying (False promise of equality, the sophisms of Pilpul and Critique, and the fawning of undue praise) were modernized from supernatural to pseudoscientific, then sophistry, then outright denial, in Authoritarian Marxism-Socialism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158436239885950976
Because we developed a unique social order that started during the eighth century, and matured into the universal militia, the civil society, rule of law under natural law, and by way of locke, smith, and hume, the american constitution that codified it. A ‘third way’. and…
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 15:20:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158397325892640768
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158396603675414529
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158396603675414529