https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/27/hierarchy-of-laws-core/CORE: THE MEANING OF LAW
(read this)
https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/27/hierarchy-of-laws-core/Updated Aug 25, 2019, 3:21 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-25 15:21:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/27/hierarchy-of-laws-core/CORE: THE MEANING OF LAW
(read this)
https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/27/hierarchy-of-laws-core/Updated Aug 25, 2019, 3:21 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-25 15:21:00 UTC
—“One of the common themes we see from some people who countersignal us is often they seem to pooh-pooh law as a solution and think that everything can be solved with some sort of aesthetic… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=453302635266632&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-23 11:36:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164863909553213441
—“One of the common themes we see from some people who countersignal us is often they seem to pooh-pooh law as a solution and think that everything can be solved with some sort of aesthetic or spiritual movement. These guys are often young. I see them as just looking for a solution within a frame they understand and that is intuitive to them. In contrast to some of the more mature people who have a spiritual bent but also recognize the importance of punishment (law) and that not everything can be accomplished only with persuasion.”— John Mark
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-23 07:36:00 UTC
THREE INSIGHTS TODAY
1) Constitution
I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft of the constitution:
… i) Not separating the law from the constitution itself. The Law is The Law regardless of the constitution created under it. The constitution is an application of the law. The policies are actions within the constitution AND the law. So I have to reorganize a bit and make the law ‘the law’.
… And ii) I conflated the Law, the forms of government we can choose under it, with the restitutions due us for abuse of the previous constitution. With the threats of what terms we will impose if that constitution and those restitutions are not granted. (escalation terms).
2) Western Group Rhetoric doesn’t Consider Fraud and Deceit
We have been high trust so long we forgot the alternatives. And as such our rhetoric and our position in debate is one of ignorance, or error, or cognitive bias – we discuss cognitive biases and fallacies at length. But we do not discuss deceits with the same depth. Largely because we are not practitioners of them. So our Enemies are however, not engaging in ignorance, error, or cognitive bias -they are engaging in deceit in order to perpetuate a fraud. And no Thief submits to reason, nor abandons his theft except under punishment and forcible restitution.
So part of the work we have ahead of us is systematically training people in not only the errors and biases, but deceits. And adding the deceits to our listings of fallacies and Cognitive biases.
3) Honest Discourse Terms on the Taboos
The systematic attempt to render subjects taboo has to end. So I’m going to specifically address the taboos, and campaign against their suppression.
I’ll add this to the class action.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-22 21:47:31 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102662828927959063
1) Constitution I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft of the constitution:
… i) Not separating the law from the constitution itself. The Law is The Law regardless of the constitution created under it. The constitution is an application of the law. The policies are actions within the constitution AND the law. So I have to reorganize a bit and make the law ‘the law’.
… And ii) I conflated the Law, the forms of government we can choose under it, with the restitutions due us for abuse of the previous constitution. With the threats of what terms we will impose if that constitution and those restitutions are not granted. (escalation terms). 2) Western Group Rhetoric doesn’t Consider Fraud and Deceit We have been high trust so long we forgot the alternatives. And as such our rhetoric and our position in debate is one of ignorance, or error, or cognitive bias – we discuss cognitive biases and fallacies at length. But we do not discuss deceits with the same depth. Largely because we are not practitioners of them. So our Enemies are however, not engaging in ignorance, error, or cognitive bias -they are engaging in deceit in order to perpetuate a fraud. And no Thief submits to reason, nor abandons his theft except under punishment and forcible restitution. So part of the work we have ahead of us is systematically training people in not only the errors and biases, but deceits. And adding the deceits to our listings of fallacies and Cognitive biases. 3) Honest Discourse Terms on the Taboos The systematic attempt to render subjects taboo has to end. So I’m going to specifically address the taboos, and campaign against their suppression. I’ll add this to the class action.
1) Constitution I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft of the constitution:
… i) Not separating the law from the constitution itself. The Law is The Law regardless of the constitution created under it. The constitution is an application of the law. The policies are actions within the constitution AND the law. So I have to reorganize a bit and make the law ‘the law’.
… And ii) I conflated the Law, the forms of government we can choose under it, with the restitutions due us for abuse of the previous constitution. With the threats of what terms we will impose if that constitution and those restitutions are not granted. (escalation terms). 2) Western Group Rhetoric doesn’t Consider Fraud and Deceit We have been high trust so long we forgot the alternatives. And as such our rhetoric and our position in debate is one of ignorance, or error, or cognitive bias – we discuss cognitive biases and fallacies at length. But we do not discuss deceits with the same depth. Largely because we are not practitioners of them. So our Enemies are however, not engaging in ignorance, error, or cognitive bias -they are engaging in deceit in order to perpetuate a fraud. And no Thief submits to reason, nor abandons his theft except under punishment and forcible restitution. So part of the work we have ahead of us is systematically training people in not only the errors and biases, but deceits. And adding the deceits to our listings of fallacies and Cognitive biases. 3) Honest Discourse Terms on the Taboos The systematic attempt to render subjects taboo has to end. So I’m going to specifically address the taboos, and campaign against their suppression. I’ll add this to the class action.
The debate is between RULE OF LAW (capitalism) and ARBITRARY RULE (everything else). You will not reframe this argument as a means of destroying the American experiment in a “Third Way”: A Purely Middle Class Society of Responsible People.
You want something else: Then Go Home.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 18:27:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164242727866908672
Reply addressees: @AndrewYang
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163943868825554946
IN REPLY TO:
@AndrewYang
The socialism vs. capitalism debate is dated and unproductive. We need to break out of this simplistic mindset and pass legislation that would benefit all Americans, without regard for labels that are rapidly losing their relevance. https://t.co/3fKCDZOLJQ
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163943868825554946
The primary problem for expanding the House of Commons (and Lords for that Matter) to include the colonies was practicality: the travel time for physical communication. The alternative was to return power to the monarchy and run the colonies as separate governments. We didn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 15:39:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164200447537754112
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164181678337622018
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Understand? We were wrong. We had the perfect form of government. It just didn’t reform fast enough given the rate of colonial expansion.
Constitution, Monarchy, Supreme Court, House of Lords (Territories), House of Commons (Business), and Church (house of family).
END DEMOCRACY https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/763151157590056961
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1164181678337622018
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
Understand? We were wrong. We had the perfect form of government. It just didn’t reform fast enough given the rate of colonial expansion.
Constitution, Monarchy, Supreme Court, House of Lords (Territories), House of Commons (Business), and Church (house of family).
END DEMOCRACY https://t.co/LrO9kKQbHM
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1164181678337622018
Understand? We were wrong. We had the perfect form of government. It just didn’t reform fast enough given the rate of colonial expansion.
Constitution, Monarchy, Supreme Court, House of Lords (Territories), House of Commons (Business), and Church (house of family).
END DEMOCRACY https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/763151157590056961
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 14:25:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164181678337622018
https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/763151157590056961
Is he wrong? I mean. Whether you like it or not, is he stating the truth? That by and large the jewish intellectual class works against the anglo saxon common law constitutional tradition, and still, regardless of history advocates for leftist causes?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 01:33:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163987425435295744
Reply addressees: @PalmerReport
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163948162048024577
IN REPLY TO:
@PalmerReport
Donald Trump just basically said that Jews aren’t real Americans https://t.co/DA05TcvTjB
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163948162048024577