Theme: Constitutional Order

  • THE MEANING OF LAW (read this) Aug 25, 2019, 3:21 PM

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/27/hierarchy-of-laws-core/CORE: THE MEANING OF LAW

    (read this)

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/27/hierarchy-of-laws-core/Updated Aug 25, 2019, 3:21 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-25 15:21:00 UTC

  • “One of the common themes we see from some people who countersignal us is often

    —“One of the common themes we see from some people who countersignal us is often they seem to pooh-pooh law as a solution and think that everything can be solved with some sort of aesthetic… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=453302635266632&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-23 11:36:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164863909553213441

  • “One of the common themes we see from some people who countersignal us is often

    —“One of the common themes we see from some people who countersignal us is often they seem to pooh-pooh law as a solution and think that everything can be solved with some sort of aesthetic or spiritual movement. These guys are often young. I see them as just looking for a solution within a frame they understand and that is intuitive to them. In contrast to some of the more mature people who have a spiritual bent but also recognize the importance of punishment (law) and that not everything can be accomplished only with persuasion.”— John Mark


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-23 07:36:00 UTC

  • THREE INSIGHTS TODAY 1) Constitution I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft

    THREE INSIGHTS TODAY

    1) Constitution

    I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft of the constitution:

    … i) Not separating the law from the constitution itself. The Law is The Law regardless of the constitution created under it. The constitution is an application of the law. The policies are actions within the constitution AND the law. So I have to reorganize a bit and make the law ‘the law’.

    … And ii) I conflated the Law, the forms of government we can choose under it, with the restitutions due us for abuse of the previous constitution. With the threats of what terms we will impose if that constitution and those restitutions are not granted. (escalation terms).

    2) Western Group Rhetoric doesn’t Consider Fraud and Deceit

    We have been high trust so long we forgot the alternatives. And as such our rhetoric and our position in debate is one of ignorance, or error, or cognitive bias – we discuss cognitive biases and fallacies at length. But we do not discuss deceits with the same depth. Largely because we are not practitioners of them. So our Enemies are however, not engaging in ignorance, error, or cognitive bias -they are engaging in deceit in order to perpetuate a fraud. And no Thief submits to reason, nor abandons his theft except under punishment and forcible restitution.

    So part of the work we have ahead of us is systematically training people in not only the errors and biases, but deceits. And adding the deceits to our listings of fallacies and Cognitive biases.

    3) Honest Discourse Terms on the Taboos

    The systematic attempt to render subjects taboo has to end. So I’m going to specifically address the taboos, and campaign against their suppression.

    I’ll add this to the class action.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-22 21:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102662828927959063

  • Three Insights Today

    1) Constitution I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft of the constitution:

    … i) Not separating the law from the constitution itself. The Law is The Law regardless of the constitution created under it. The constitution is an application of the law. The policies are actions within the constitution AND the law. So I have to reorganize a bit and make the law ‘the law’.

    … And ii) I conflated the Law, the forms of government we can choose under it, with the restitutions due us for abuse of the previous constitution. With the threats of what terms we will impose if that constitution and those restitutions are not granted. (escalation terms). 2) Western Group Rhetoric doesn’t Consider Fraud and Deceit We have been high trust so long we forgot the alternatives. And as such our rhetoric and our position in debate is one of ignorance, or error, or cognitive bias – we discuss cognitive biases and fallacies at length. But we do not discuss deceits with the same depth. Largely because we are not practitioners of them. So our Enemies are however, not engaging in ignorance, error, or cognitive bias -they are engaging in deceit in order to perpetuate a fraud. And no Thief submits to reason, nor abandons his theft except under punishment and forcible restitution. So part of the work we have ahead of us is systematically training people in not only the errors and biases, but deceits.  And adding the deceits to our listings of fallacies and Cognitive biases. 3) Honest Discourse Terms on the Taboos The systematic attempt to render subjects taboo has to end.  So I’m going to specifically address the taboos, and campaign against their suppression. I’ll add this to the class action.  

  • Three Insights Today

    1) Constitution I made a two mistakes in sketching a draft of the constitution:

    … i) Not separating the law from the constitution itself. The Law is The Law regardless of the constitution created under it. The constitution is an application of the law. The policies are actions within the constitution AND the law. So I have to reorganize a bit and make the law ‘the law’.

    … And ii) I conflated the Law, the forms of government we can choose under it, with the restitutions due us for abuse of the previous constitution. With the threats of what terms we will impose if that constitution and those restitutions are not granted. (escalation terms). 2) Western Group Rhetoric doesn’t Consider Fraud and Deceit We have been high trust so long we forgot the alternatives. And as such our rhetoric and our position in debate is one of ignorance, or error, or cognitive bias – we discuss cognitive biases and fallacies at length. But we do not discuss deceits with the same depth. Largely because we are not practitioners of them. So our Enemies are however, not engaging in ignorance, error, or cognitive bias -they are engaging in deceit in order to perpetuate a fraud. And no Thief submits to reason, nor abandons his theft except under punishment and forcible restitution. So part of the work we have ahead of us is systematically training people in not only the errors and biases, but deceits.  And adding the deceits to our listings of fallacies and Cognitive biases. 3) Honest Discourse Terms on the Taboos The systematic attempt to render subjects taboo has to end.  So I’m going to specifically address the taboos, and campaign against their suppression. I’ll add this to the class action.  

  • The debate is between RULE OF LAW (capitalism) and ARBITRARY RULE (everything el

    The debate is between RULE OF LAW (capitalism) and ARBITRARY RULE (everything else). You will not reframe this argument as a means of destroying the American experiment in a “Third Way”: A Purely Middle Class Society of Responsible People.

    You want something else: Then Go Home.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 18:27:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164242727866908672

    Reply addressees: @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163943868825554946


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AndrewYang

    The socialism vs. capitalism debate is dated and unproductive. We need to break out of this simplistic mindset and pass legislation that would benefit all Americans, without regard for labels that are rapidly losing their relevance. https://t.co/3fKCDZOLJQ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163943868825554946

  • The primary problem for expanding the House of Commons (and Lords for that Matte

    The primary problem for expanding the House of Commons (and Lords for that Matter) to include the colonies was practicality: the travel time for physical communication. The alternative was to return power to the monarchy and run the colonies as separate governments. We didn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 15:39:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164200447537754112

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164181678337622018


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Understand? We were wrong. We had the perfect form of government. It just didn’t reform fast enough given the rate of colonial expansion.
    Constitution, Monarchy, Supreme Court, House of Lords (Territories), House of Commons (Business), and Church (house of family).
    END DEMOCRACY https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/763151157590056961

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1164181678337622018


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Understand? We were wrong. We had the perfect form of government. It just didn’t reform fast enough given the rate of colonial expansion.
    Constitution, Monarchy, Supreme Court, House of Lords (Territories), House of Commons (Business), and Church (house of family).
    END DEMOCRACY https://t.co/LrO9kKQbHM

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1164181678337622018

  • Understand? We were wrong. We had the perfect form of government. It just didn’t

    Understand? We were wrong. We had the perfect form of government. It just didn’t reform fast enough given the rate of colonial expansion.
    Constitution, Monarchy, Supreme Court, House of Lords (Territories), House of Commons (Business), and Church (house of family).
    END DEMOCRACY https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/763151157590056961

  • Is he wrong? I mean. Whether you like it or not, is he stating the truth? That b

    Is he wrong? I mean. Whether you like it or not, is he stating the truth? That by and large the jewish intellectual class works against the anglo saxon common law constitutional tradition, and still, regardless of history advocates for leftist causes?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 01:33:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163987425435295744

    Reply addressees: @PalmerReport

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163948162048024577


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PalmerReport

    Donald Trump just basically said that Jews aren’t real Americans https://t.co/DA05TcvTjB

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163948162048024577