Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING

    THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY

    by Reece Haynes

    5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people.

    And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary.

    Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes.

    And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.

    —

    CD:

    The judicial novelties I’ve found are:

    1. The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.

    2. The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.

    3. The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.

    4. The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.

    5. The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.

    6. The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.

    7. the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time

    8. The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.

    9. The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.

    10. The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.

    11. The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.

    12. The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.

    13. Universal standing in matters of the commons

    14. Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.

    15. The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:06:00 UTC

  • This rough solution solves the problem of preserving the value of scale of both

    This rough solution solves the problem of preserving the value of scale of both traditional european weak federal unity providing monetary, economic, and military security while allowing the separation of traditional peoples from immigrant and urban peoples.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 16:32:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282963321966592

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282962260733952

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the natural law sovereignty and reciprocity; the terms by which the law is conducted; and detail of the law that enumerates the powers, and processes.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282962260733952

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the natural law sovereignty and reciprocity; the terms by which the law is conducted; and detail of the law that enumerates the powers, and processes.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282962260733952

  • The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the

    The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the natural law sovereignty and reciprocity; the terms by which the law is conducted; and detail of the law that enumerates the powers, and processes.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 16:32:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282962260733952

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282961216430084

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics;reduces power distance in producing those commons;allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282961216430084

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics;reduces power distance in producing those commons;allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282961216430084

  • This restores the original intent of the constitution which is a continental mil

    This restores the original intent of the constitution which is a continental military and trade organization, and treasury and insurer of last resort, with norms, policy, and laws serving the interests of polites as the british empire;a weak federal government as was the church.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 16:32:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282960113307648

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282959047888896

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    The Senate can hire a cabinet. States can be formed with 300k population; and any group anywhere can secede and reassociate at the county, district, and neighborhood level taking their debts with them. And the federal courts can mediate conflicts across borders.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282959047888896

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    The Senate can hire a cabinet. States can be formed with 300k population; and any group anywhere can secede and reassociate at the county, district, and neighborhood level taking their debts with them. And the federal courts can mediate conflicts across borders.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282959047888896

  • The Senate can hire a cabinet. States can be formed with 300k population; and an

    The Senate can hire a cabinet. States can be formed with 300k population; and any group anywhere can secede and reassociate at the county, district, and neighborhood level taking their debts with them. And the federal courts can mediate conflicts across borders.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 16:32:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282959047888896

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282957881954304

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    So, end the presidency; house of representatives; restore appointment to the senate by each state legislature; convert the (blue) liberal immigrant cities to states; articulate the 10th demarcating federal and state powers; all but military, treasury, benefits revert to states.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282957881954304

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    So, end the presidency; house of representatives; restore appointment to the senate by each state legislature; convert the (blue) liberal immigrant cities to states; articulate the 10th demarcating federal and state powers; all but military, treasury, benefits revert to states.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282957881954304

  • So, end the presidency; house of representatives; restore appointment to the sen

    So, end the presidency; house of representatives; restore appointment to the senate by each state legislature; convert the (blue) liberal immigrant cities to states; articulate the 10th demarcating federal and state powers; all but military, treasury, benefits revert to states.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 16:32:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282957881954304

  • The enemy will be powerless if we get the constitution through, because it incre

    The enemy will be powerless if we get the constitution through, because it incrementally increase the scope of the law to prohibit every single means by which undermining and baiting into hazard is produced.

    By radically reforming the financial sector, all those trillions will go into the public coffers every year, and ur people will be out of debt slavery.

    By radically reforming the university we will have far fewer people getting into household levesls of reproductively preventative debt.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 13:38:00 UTC

  • A SIMPLE PRESCRIPTION FOR A POLITICAL SOLUTION Whether libertarian, conservative

    A SIMPLE PRESCRIPTION FOR A POLITICAL SOLUTION

    Whether libertarian, conservative, right, or hard right you should follow me even if you don’t always get what I’m on about. Traditionalists and Christians too – just grit your teeth when I go all ‘Yes, Christianity but no to Abrahamic Theology’. ‘Cause together we will win. 😉

    The American Revolution for Independence from the crown had less support than the conservatives currently do – even those conservatives that are willing to fight. The only thing preventing conservatives from acting is a prescription for a solution that is possible to implement.

    So, end the presidency; house of representatives; restore appointment to the senate by each state legislature; convert the (blue) liberal immigrant cities to states; articulate the 10th demarcating federal and state powers; all but military, treasury, benefits revert to states.

    The Senate can hire a cabinet. States can be formed with 300k population; and any group anywhere can secede and re-associate at the county, district, and neighborhood level taking their debts with them. And the federal courts can mediate conflicts across borders.

    This restores the original intent of the constitution which is a continental military and trade organization, and treasury and insurer of last resort, with norms, policy, and laws serving the interests of polites as the british empire; a weak federal government as was the church.

    This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics; reduces power distance in producing those commons; allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference.

    The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the natural law sovereignty and reciprocity; the terms by which the law is conducted; and detail of the law that enumerates the powers, and processes.

    This rough solution solves the problem of preserving the value of scale of both traditional european weak federal unity providing monetary, economic, and military security while allowing the separation of traditional peoples from immigrant and urban peoples.

    I have not addressed the most important reformation of the Monetary, Treasury, banking, financial, consumer credit, and debt sectors which will be the greatest reallocation of economic advantage in centuries – and the opposite of marxist folly. That’s for elsewhere.

    -cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 11:37:00 UTC

  • I just stick with (a) jesus’ teaching is reducible to five points, (b) the ten c

    I just stick with (a) jesus’ teaching is reducible to five points, (b) the ten commandments are just the law of tort, ( c) and europeans dont need to lie about either because we’ve always practiced sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, jury, tripartism, and aristocratic egalitarianism. It’s just that each of those ideas takes a standard deviation higher intelligence than the semitic religions to grasp. And that’s the net of it right there.

    There is no evidence people need faith. It’s a normative conclusion. People need a binding intergenerational narrative. It must have an embedded ambition. But most of the world did quite well before nonsense-religions. Ancestor worship and buddhism for the east, and ancestor worship and stoicism for the west are obvious examples.

    Jesus fits into the indo-european trinary religion just fine and if he had been included into the pantheon we wouldn’t have this problem – but the semites wanted to undermine the great, joyous, greco roman empire (and persian, and egyptian..) with a mandatory authoritarian universalist religoin so that they could encourage (warring, lying, cheating, malicious, awful) middle eastern tribal people.

    But judaism succeeded by separatism, and christianity failed among tribal people, and islam evolved out of a christan sect into a conquering rather than undermining version of abrahamism.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 07:12:00 UTC

  • CURT CAN YOU EXPLAIN… (LEGAL REFORM) —“I just read your “Civilizational Diff

    CURT CAN YOU EXPLAIN… (LEGAL REFORM)

    —“I just read your “Civilizational Differences in Strategy and Conflict”. Excellent work! … I have a question. Toward the end of the post, you write “punish it in a via-negativa market for the continuous suppression of profit by plausible deniability of accountability”. Can you give an example of such a market, or an example of the effect of of such a market? Do you mean punishment for an observed negative consequence to a demonstrated interest (reciprocity)?”—

    “profit from plausible deniability to bait into hazard”

    Selling goods or services without warranty

    Selling drugs, encouraging prostitution, or pornography.

    Selling gambling, selling alcohol on credit, selling credit.

    Selling improbabilities, advertising, religion

    Selling marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism…

    One is not accountable for the consequences, because there is no warranty stated, and no warranty enforced. This is how abrahamic method of deceit was spread: western sovereignty is vulnerable to undermining because sovereigns are not prohibited from making bad choices, and we have forbidden retaliation and restitution for consequences of volition – even voluntary choice to be baited into hazard.

    In other words, the current emphasis on criminal reform is to add requirement for intent to stop police from criminalizing accidental violations. So our requirement for means, motive, opportunity, would be increased to include ‘intent’ also.

    Likewise, my emphasis on libility reform would be to force involuntary warranty on any baiting into hazard – which would effectively outlaw baiting into hazard, as *violating sovereignty* in the same way deceit violates sovereignty – and literally gut the advertising, media, entertainment, gambling, academic, credit card, consumer-financial, debt collection, and political sectors, and even the contracts for things like cell and cable bills. this effectively converts buyer beware (despite his or her ignorance) to lender beware (because of their asymmetric knowledge of risks). Instead all of this lending would go through the treasury and all CONSUMER interest be captured for the commons. If we combine liquidity distribution (managing the money supply) with direct distribution of cash to citizens on debit cards, we will invert the economy to be in the service of consumers.

    I hope this explains enough.

    Just like falsificationism and testimonialism and grammars convert justification to falsification – inverting our understanding of truth, this conversion of the law will restore sovereignty to the citizens and end the parasitism upon them that has destroyed the working middle managerial and small business classes.

    This is the greatest most revolutionary reform since the roman redistribution of land, and second only to the restructuring of continental power in the 19th century.

    And yet it is the very OPPOSITE of marxism.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 18:41:00 UTC