THE LIMITS OF DEMOCRACY UNDER OUR NATURAL LAW
@realDonaldTrump #Trump https://t.co/4huzppgfrn
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 00:33:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224128855046328321
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
THE LIMITS OF DEMOCRACY UNDER OUR NATURAL LAW @realDonaldTrump #Trump
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84008355_197812251616936_29020285706
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84008355_197812251616936_290202857062268928_o_197812248283603.jpg DEMOCRACY DOES NOT GRANT YOU RIGHTS TO DESTROY RULE OF LAWDEMOCRACY DOES NOT GRANT YOU RIGHTS TO DESTROY RULE OF LAW
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 19:19:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84178421_197786644952830_53684407446
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84178421_197786644952830_5368440744673542144_o_197786638286164.jpg THE SOLUTION IS: P-METHOD, P-LAW, P-CONSTITUTIONTHE SOLUTION IS: P-METHOD, P-LAW, P-CONSTITUTION
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 18:20:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83762105_197785768286251_15359929147
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83762105_197785768286251_1535992914797133824_o_197785758286252.jpg THE P-METHODOLOGY WE USE IN RESTORING OUR RULE OF LAW OF SOVEREIGNSTHE P-METHODOLOGY WE USE IN RESTORING OUR RULE OF LAW OF SOVEREIGNS
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 18:18:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83886149_197785191619642_90184567677
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83886149_197785191619642_9018456767750733824_o_197785188286309.jpg THE PREAMBLE TO THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONTHE PREAMBLE TO THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 18:16:00 UTC
-
But this point of view is one of an anglo who descends from the minor aristocrac
But this point of view is one of an anglo who descends from the minor aristocracy, and the puritanical, empirical, common law tradition. We can understand the continent but the continent cannot understand us. We escaped even secular theology – I just don’t know if it was good.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 16:08:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224001564748255233
Reply addressees: @Hauptgefreiter1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224000942862929924
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Hauptgefreiter1 This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from rousseau to kant to marx to present europe is ‘stuck’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224000942862929924
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Hauptgefreiter1 This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from rousseau to kant to marx to present europe is ‘stuck’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224000942862929924
-
Well, it’s certainly about preserving 3500 years of european civilization’s foun
Well, it’s certainly about preserving 3500 years of european civilization’s foundation under individual Sovereignty, the reciprocity and rule of law, jury, and markets that are possible under it. And if you can’t integrate into that then yes you’re inferior regardless of race.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:34:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223796848005189632
Reply addressees: @pulmyears
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223731517039378432
IN REPLY TO:
@pulmyears
Any claims to this being about the Second Amendment or freedom go out the window when you imagine any person of color doing this very stunt. The NRA isn’t about safety or freedom, it’s about arming the Confederacy, enforcing white supremacy. https://t.co/V6HihcfFrx
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223731517039378432
-
So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was institut
So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 01:58:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481
Reply addressees: @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792
-
INALIENABLE RIGHTS Inalienable means not only that it can’t be taken from you bu
INALIENABLE RIGHTS
Inalienable means not only that it can’t be taken from you but you can’t let it be taken from you and you can’t give it away.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:39:00 UTC
-
WHAT IT SAYS RIGHT THERE IN TEXT… by Jerry Odom —“We hold these truths to be
WHAT IT SAYS RIGHT THERE IN TEXT…
by Jerry Odom
—“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the “consent” of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, ….”—
So what it says here is our rights don’t come from government or from words on paper. Let’s be real here the only reason that we actually create government is to protect the rights of the people.
So, what are inalienable rights? Among the natural rights of the people, are life, liberty, and property together with the right to protect and defend them with the best possible means possible.
So if you don’t have the right to life you’re dead, if you don’t have liberty in your servant of the government you created, if you don’t have a right to property and that you don’t have a right to life and your subject to whoever owns the property, if you don’t have a right to defend these things than you are slave you are not a free man, if you have to ask permission of the government protect my life my and my property then you are not a free man, inalienable rights are not subject to laws of man especially when we gave them the ability to govern based on the consent of the people.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:38:00 UTC