The Consistency of Laws https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/the-consistency-of-laws/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 13:15:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266719970685186050
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
The Consistency of Laws
Feb 20, 2020, 8:21 PM
If Natural Law, Physical Law and Gods Law are the same then yes, morals come from God. If morals are not the same as natural and physical law then men have erred in interpreting gods or nature’s law.
I prefer christians, especially devoted christians over all other people – and the evidentiary reality is christianity ‘works’ to produce better people than all other religions and better than every secular alternative. I just prefer to maintain the separation between law(Truth) and faith(Wisdom) and so theology must defend wisdom claims (the good) not truth claims (the true or false).
–“I thought doolittle was anti religion”– Nathan Danner —“I’m not sure his religious views. These two are bringing religion into propertarianism whether Kurt intended it to be there or not.”—Nate
I have a job and I do my job. My job is to protect my people from the left’s lies, and another dark age – and part of that job is to discover a way to restore a religion to ‘the religion of the state’. I know it is hard for the faithful to tolerate my work on religion. It’s certainly hard on me. And I request only that while I work on law others work on faith, and hopefully I will someday discover a means of uniting them.
-
The Consistency of Laws
Feb 20, 2020, 8:21 PM
If Natural Law, Physical Law and Gods Law are the same then yes, morals come from God. If morals are not the same as natural and physical law then men have erred in interpreting gods or nature’s law.
I prefer christians, especially devoted christians over all other people – and the evidentiary reality is christianity ‘works’ to produce better people than all other religions and better than every secular alternative. I just prefer to maintain the separation between law(Truth) and faith(Wisdom) and so theology must defend wisdom claims (the good) not truth claims (the true or false).
–“I thought doolittle was anti religion”– Nathan Danner —“I’m not sure his religious views. These two are bringing religion into propertarianism whether Kurt intended it to be there or not.”—Nate
I have a job and I do my job. My job is to protect my people from the left’s lies, and another dark age – and part of that job is to discover a way to restore a religion to ‘the religion of the state’. I know it is hard for the faithful to tolerate my work on religion. It’s certainly hard on me. And I request only that while I work on law others work on faith, and hopefully I will someday discover a means of uniting them.
-
Constitutions don’t save you (us). They explain the terms by which others do not
Constitutions don’t save you (us). They explain the terms by which others do not need saving from you (us).
-
Constitutions don’t save you (us). They explain the terms by which others do not
Constitutions don’t save you (us). They explain the terms by which others do not need saving from you (us).
-
The Problem
Feb 28, 2020, 12:00 PM by Predmetsky Rosenborg
You don’t have to be an atheist (I’m not) to see that it is impossible to produce a Christian constitution from Christian doctrine because it is impossible to produce Christian doctrine from Christian scriptures. A constitution requires clarity, which is impossible to accomplish with the religious texts of any religion.
-
The Problem
Feb 28, 2020, 12:00 PM by Predmetsky Rosenborg
You don’t have to be an atheist (I’m not) to see that it is impossible to produce a Christian constitution from Christian doctrine because it is impossible to produce Christian doctrine from Christian scriptures. A constitution requires clarity, which is impossible to accomplish with the religious texts of any religion.
-
Possibilities Under the Law
Possibilities Under the Law https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/possibilities-under-the-law/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 22:41:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266499899681636353
-
Possibilities Under the Law
One cannot legislate belief (thought) One cannot legislate unbelief (thought) One can legislate public speech (display, word, and deed) One can legislate proselytizing (sale and distribution) One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)
-
Possibilities Under the Law
One cannot legislate belief (thought) One cannot legislate unbelief (thought) One can legislate public speech (display, word, and deed) One can legislate proselytizing (sale and distribution) One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)