Theme: Constitutional Order

  • @charlieprime P-movement can’t ‘fail’. P-Logic and P-Law are simply science. The

    @charlieprime P-movement can’t ‘fail’. P-Logic and P-Law are simply science. The constitutional solution is and policies would end the jewish organized crimes against our people. They would restore our people to power. And let us use that power to incrementally restore ourselves. The strategy of showing up in numbers, issuing moral demands, with the threat of turning hot would control the public dialog, bait antifa and the rest of the enemy onto our terms, and create public demand for settlement. That ‘influence’ would radically increase our numbers.

    You can fail to make use of those techniques. I can only fail to educate you in them. And you don’t appear to be educable. Which is why you’ve been abandoned, discarded, left behind, and don’t have leaders, thought leaders, or elites, are a minority in school age, and within eight years be a minority in electoral age. Then they will gradually exterminate you and yours. Meanwhile, us 1%ers will be just fine thank you.

    I won’t pander to you. If you’re too stupid to follow this plan then find someone with a better one, and I’ll do my job for posterity. What? There aren’t any? Oh. Yeah. You forgot that. Right? 😉

    Our experiment of trying to make an intellectual and political movement out of white trash was interesting – but we can’t make an intellectual movement for anti-intellectuals, and we can’t make a political movement for anti-politicals, and we can’t make a social movement for anti-socials, you can’t get sacrifice from the ‘white privileged working and laboring class’ or the Virtue signaling Christians, and you can’t ask for courage from paranoid cowards

    The left will always adapt faster. The left will always organize faster. The left will always use superior numbers. The left will always win optics. The left will awlays empower the state. Because they have a plausible moral high ground as long as you live and breathe. SO they seek to (and will) end your living and breathing just like south africa.

    The only way to win is to take the moral high ground, and defend it with violence. You can’t bear the optics of taking the moral high ground, and you can’t bear the cost of showing up to fight. So you’re dead weight.

    Like I said. Cowards hiding behind Purity-Spirals.

    So I just do my job, casting pearls before swine. In the hope, that like Aristotle, I can benefit future generations – if there ever are any. 😉

    And I have no problem sweating my balls off or pandering to the enemy in the meantime. I show up.

    You can’t even show up. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-19 17:32:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104717243218700242

  • Optimums 1. Germans – Imperial and Social Oder 2. English – Political Order 3. F

    Optimums
    1. Germans – Imperial and Social Oder
    2. English – Political Order
    3. Founders – Legal Order
    4. Gandhi – Populist High Ground – Slowest
    5. IRA – Political High Ground – Slow
    6. Mao – Restoration Solution – Fast
    7. French – “Purge” Solution
    7. ISIS – Destroying – Fastest

    Reply addressees: @_Indirection

  • RT @VDAREJamesK: Every election since the 1965 Immigration Act is illegitimate.

    RT @VDAREJamesK: Every election since the 1965 Immigration Act is illegitimate. Good night.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-17 15:23:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295380654327246848

  • RT @VDAREJamesK: Every election since the 1965 Immigration Act is illegitimate.

    RT @VDAREJamesK: Every election since the 1965 Immigration Act is illegitimate. Good night.

  • Rule of Law is what’s important. Only the British empire ever had it. Only Ameri

    Rule of Law is what’s important. Only the British empire ever had it. Only Americans ever formalized it. And Britain’s didn’t survive the emancipation of 1858, and American’s didn’t survive the postwar invasion. It takes one generation for the enemy within to destroy rule of law.

    Reply addressees: @RealityRelate

  • Rule of Law is what’s important. Only the British empire ever had it. Only Ameri

    Rule of Law is what’s important. Only the British empire ever had it. Only Americans ever formalized it. And Britain’s didn’t survive the emancipation of 1858, and American’s didn’t survive the postwar invasion. It takes one generation for the enemy within to destroy rule of law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 23:11:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292961831766589449

    Reply addressees: @RealityRelate

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292945042726965255

  • Q&A: On The Risk of Altering the Constitution (None)

    Q&A: On The Risk of Altering the Constitution (None) https://t.co/1X3d20Epun

  • Q&A: On The Risk of Altering the Constitution (None)

    Q&A: On The Risk of Altering the Constitution (None) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/08/10/qa-on-the-risk-of-altering-the-constitution-none/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 18:06:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292884946743431169

  • Q&A: On The Risk of Altering the Constitution (None)

    Q&A: ON THE RISK OF ALTERING THE CONSTITUTION

    —“A question about introducing any deviation that has to do with the Constitution or laws. Can the changes be distorted or used for so-called evil or watch what you ask for sometimes you get it. One example. A right to open carry firearms sounds good but what if all the criminals open carry firearms sometimes it’s a double-edged sword. Any thoughts.”—

    There are about six deep holes in the constiutuion because it was concerned with government, not the use of common law within the government. That’s why the bill of rights were an afterthought. P-Law is ‘strictly constructed law”. It fixes those holes in the constitution. The changes harden the constitution’s so that it’s almost impossible to ‘interpret’ rather than ‘apply’ the law. You can see my post on those six problems here:

    As for the ‘loss of rights and obligations, we handle that elsewhere. Solving that problem was changing our law from being concerned with the duration of punishment (infraction, misdemeanor, felony, treason, to disambiguate predatory crimes of violence from crimes of passion, from non-violent crimes. Only predatory crimes should cause the loss of right to bear arms. This prevents the ‘criminalization’ of non-crimes in order to deprive people of rights.

    This ties into the protection of marriage.s students of the empirical revolution, the agrarian revolution, the commercial revolution, and the enlightenment, our American civilization was architected and designed upon the natural law and ru…

  • Q&A: On The Risk of Altering the Constitution (None)

    Q&A: ON THE RISK OF ALTERING THE CONSTITUTION

    —“A question about introducing any deviation that has to do with the Constitution or laws. Can the changes be distorted or used for so-called evil or watch what you ask for sometimes you get it. One example. A right to open carry firearms sounds good but what if all the criminals open carry firearms sometimes it’s a double-edged sword. Any thoughts.”—

    There are about six deep holes in the constiutuion because it was concerned with government, not the use of common law within the government. That’s why the bill of rights were an afterthought. P-Law is ‘strictly constructed law”. It fixes those holes in the constitution. The changes harden the constitution’s so that it’s almost impossible to ‘interpret’ rather than ‘apply’ the law. You can see my post on those six problems here:

    As for the ‘loss of rights and obligations, we handle that elsewhere. Solving that problem was changing our law from being concerned with the duration of punishment (infraction, misdemeanor, felony, treason, to disambiguate predatory crimes of violence from crimes of passion, from non-violent crimes. Only predatory crimes should cause the loss of right to bear arms. This prevents the ‘criminalization’ of non-crimes in order to deprive people of rights.

    This ties into the protection of marriage.s students of the empirical revolution, the agrarian revolution, the commercial revolution, and the enlightenment, our American civilization was architected and designed upon the natural law and ru…