2022.02.13 Learning PLaw – Legislation Template – Part 2
https://youtu.be/EIYrLM1AE8A
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 21:58:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492981426593087494
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
2022.02.13 Learning PLaw – Legislation Template – Part 2
-
LEARNING P-LAW – The Requirements fo Legislation Part 1
LEARNING P-LAW – The Requirements fo Legislation Part 1
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 21:55:12 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107792912353064096
-
LEARNING P-LAW – The Requirements fo Legislation Part 1
LEARNING P-LAW – The Requirements fo Legislation Part 1
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 21:54:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107792911186449263
-
RT @toodarkmark: Great video explaining the historical role of legislature, judg
RT @toodarkmark: Great video explaining the historical role of legislature, judge and jury.
https://youtu.be/OEhN2V1PxDI?t=2999
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 19:15:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492940632167526405
-
@Wanderers_Choice However, no one HAS rights. Rights are constructed by institut
@Wanderers_Choice However, no one HAS rights. Rights are constructed by institutions that we call the military, state, judiciary, and law enforcement.
Natural rights are just those we need or desire. Existential rights are created.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 06:07:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107789185673982446
-
@Wanderers_Choice Not sure I understeand the context. The freedom of speech ques
@Wanderers_Choice Not sure I understeand the context. The freedom of speech question limits the federal government and the state governments from violating your right to speech in most circumstances (ie not including yelling fire in a theatre). But this does not mean that private companies and social groups can’t do so.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 06:05:38 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107789178542931723
-
This is a great discussion of the difference between legal Decidability, Judgeme
This is a great discussion of the difference between legal Decidability, Judgement, and Discretion, and how this graceful series in our post-hoc common law system, is expressed acxross our political economic social and judicial systems. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1492634318195372036
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 01:02:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492665384117456897
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1492634318195372036
-
Of course my works explais that it’s the competition between via-negativa center
Of course my works explais that it’s the competition between via-negativa center right (law) limits, and via-positiva center left (insurance) wants, that COMPUTES the optimum political policy by discovery of trades between high agency right and low agency left.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 19:22:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491854999546212356
-
Boost of @curtd @asomd2021 @Wanderers_Choice @RadioFreeNorthwest Yes to clarify,
Boost of @curtd@asomd2021@Wanderers_Choice@RadioFreeNorthwest
Yes to clarify, there is a difference between continuous increase in precision and falsehood. And there is a difference between a law, a first principle, a settled theory, a working theory, a proposed theory, and a hypothesis.
Most science since the greeks has continuously increased in precision rather than falsified the entirety of the theory. And even those theories that are stated as scientific laws. For example there is something wrong with the formula for gravity but that does not mean the theory is false. It means it is only incompete.
From Aristotle to newton to einstein has been an increase in precision. And gravity is still incomplete. Was newton wrong? no. at human scale his theory was sufficient, but in retrospect it was incomplete.
Why? Because a theory, like all knowledge, consists of the narrative by which we identify opportunities to make use of the theory, the narrative we use to explain causality, and the formula by which we measure the observations.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 02:11:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107771329183898832
-
@asomd2021 @Wanderers_Choice @RadioFreeNorthwest Yes to clarify, there is a diff
@asomd2021@Wanderers_Choice@RadioFreeNorthwest
Yes to clarify, there is a difference between continuous increase in precision and falsehood. And there is a difference between a law, a first principle, a settled theory, a working theory, a proposed theory, and a hypothesis.
Most science since the greeks has continuously increased in precision rather than falsified the entirety of the theory. And even those theories that are stated as scientific laws. For example there is something wrong with the formula for gravity but that does not mean the theory is false. It means it is only incompete.
From Aristotle to newton to einstein has been an increase in precision. And gravity is still incomplete. Was newton wrong? no. at human scale his theory was sufficient, but in retrospect it was incomplete.
Why? Because a theory, like all knowledge, consists of the narrative by which we identify opportunities to make use of the theory, the narrative we use to explain causality, and the formula by which we measure the observations.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 02:11:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107771269066692370