THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF AGENCY. Agency. Truth and Oath Duty and Commons Excellence and Heroism Sovereignty and Reciprocity The Natural Law, Judge and Jury Markets in – association – cooperation – production – reproduction – commons – polities – war. The Eugenic Civilization.
Theme: Commons
-
Yes, Norms Are Common Property
YES, NORMS ARE COMMON PROPERTY by Martin Stepan
—“So if such a thing as via-positiva norms do exist, is it possible for there to be violations of reciprocity by not adhering to said via positive norms? Or would this just be considered to be a violation of someone’s notion of the “the good”, and therefore intangible property if they show a willingness to defend it?”—Michael Bernard
[A]s long as those norms remain someone’s demonstrated interest, you can violate reciprocity by subverting them. You can always go live somewhere else where they’ll have you, and norms will be more to your liking.
-
Yes, Norms Are Common Property
YES, NORMS ARE COMMON PROPERTY by Martin Stepan
—“So if such a thing as via-positiva norms do exist, is it possible for there to be violations of reciprocity by not adhering to said via positive norms? Or would this just be considered to be a violation of someone’s notion of the “the good”, and therefore intangible property if they show a willingness to defend it?”—Michael Bernard
[A]s long as those norms remain someone’s demonstrated interest, you can violate reciprocity by subverting them. You can always go live somewhere else where they’ll have you, and norms will be more to your liking.
-
warranty of one’s words, martial testimony “reporting” in all walks of life. The
… warranty of one’s words, martial testimony “reporting” in all walks of life. The RETURNS ON COMMONS make Private returns possible, and commons require high trust and that’s why europeans are the only people to have produced them.
We call it the civil society.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 15:42:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179783790811602945
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179783331346571264
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@clairlemon Did you make that leap with me? Well, then follow me.
Taleb is a Charlatan who at first glance popularized Mandelbrot’s insights through humorous ego-inspiring essays making us feel smart like it made him feel smart. But the reality is, we have been smart for 5000 years: …Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179783331346571264
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@clairlemon Did you make that leap with me? Well, then follow me.
Taleb is a Charlatan who at first glance popularized Mandelbrot’s insights through humorous ego-inspiring essays making us feel smart like it made him feel smart. But the reality is, we have been smart for 5000 years: …Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179783331346571264
-
(b) rule of law and involuntary warranty must be extended from commercial goods
(b) rule of law and involuntary warranty must be extended from commercial goods and services to all information in the marketplace. yes that’s right. We gave license to people to not warranty their words in the 20th, and that’s the reason we are where we are today. Period.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 15:38:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179782863631376385
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@clairlemon So let me reduce Taleb’s life’s work as an essayist in ridicule of western civilization to its foundations: (a) Mandelbrot was right that the stock market is just noise so w/o inside information just invest in funds. … (and here comes the big one) …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@clairlemon So let me reduce Taleb’s life’s work as an essayist in ridicule of western civilization to its foundations: (a) Mandelbrot was right that the stock market is just noise so w/o inside information just invest in funds. … (and here comes the big one) …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585
-
(Want to compliment you on the depth, paradigm, and parsimony of that statement.
(Want to compliment you on the depth, paradigm, and parsimony of that statement. Just what I want and we need to see: connect economics, law, trust, culture, and commons. Holistic. Well done. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 14:08:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179397839920783360
Reply addressees: @trajan_decius @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179394721090809859
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179394721090809859
-
There is only one law, and one constructs rule of law under that law or one does
There is only one law, and one constructs rule of law under that law or one does not. As such all legislation (contracts of the commons) and regulation (rules of implementation) are simply contracts yes. However, there consist three states of a polity: War, Cooperation, Windfall.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:30:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179071160526487555
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179057168974254082
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179057168974254082
-
The solution is more rule of law of reciprocity, with universal standing in matt
The solution is more rule of law of reciprocity, with universal standing in matters of the commons. Sovereignty, liberty and freedom are byproducts not means.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:13:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179066810047586304
Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178875773987381255
IN REPLY TO:
@StefanMolyneux
African fertility is primarily a function of massive and immoral Western loans and “aid.”
Whatever the problem, the solution is more freedom. https://t.co/lXsS7bD1j5Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178875773987381255
-
As far as I know all libertarians want is to get defense and commons for free. Y
As far as I know all libertarians want is to get defense and commons for free. You can do that. Arctic, tundra, or desert. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 14:49:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179045754977099776
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179044894477836288
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179044894477836288
-
Where commons includes the state and its holdings and the means of defense wheth
Where commons includes the state and its holdings and the means of defense whether military, judicial or sheriff.
Collectively the government and the state also provide the services of an insurer of last resort. The problem is maintaining its role as insurer, investor, …
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 14:33:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179041559154700288
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179040903454961665
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@fryskefilosoof … whether in the market for consumption (goods services information) or the market for multipliers (commons) we call government. Technically speaking the ‘state’ consists of the assets of the polity and the law its regulator, and the government a means of producing commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179040903454961665
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@fryskefilosoof … whether in the market for consumption (goods services information) or the market for multipliers (commons) we call government. Technically speaking the ‘state’ consists of the assets of the polity and the law its regulator, and the government a means of producing commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179040903454961665