Curt Doolittle

Theme: Commons

  • NATURAL RIGHTS Technically speaking, market demand for the production of a commo

    NATURAL RIGHTS

    Technically speaking, market demand for the production of a commons(institution) that creates natural rights of appeal for defense before an insurer of some sort (court), demonstrably exist. The market demand exists. Sure. Like any commons, markets succeed or fail at producing them.

    As far as I know, the only natural right that is possible is reciprocal insurance of sovereignty against trespass(imposition of costs upon our demonstrated interests), in life(mind, body, family), liberty (privacy, movement, action, word, display, association, cooperation, production), estate (demonstrated interest, several property, share property, common property, capital), and defense (security, of life, liberty, estate).

    So Natural Rights: “Reciprocity in Sovereignty, Life, Liberty, Property, and Defense” created by “An insurer to whom one can appeal for restitution, prevention, punishment of offenders.”

    Lock didn’t get it right unfortunately.

    We can further enumerate each of these rights in order to prevent others from attempts to usurp them through sophistry and deceit.

    The declaration of human rights contains a lot of nonsense like ‘dignity’, mostly duplication, and at the end, impossible aspirations that cannot be construed as rights,

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 20:30:00 UTC

  • NO. TOLL ROADS ARE NOT PERMITTED UNDER P-CONSTITUTION —-“How would P-Law handl

    NO. TOLL ROADS ARE NOT PERMITTED UNDER P-CONSTITUTION

    —-“How would P-Law handle toll roads. More specifically, our current highway into Houston is a regular tax funded highway, with an oversized median between the two directional lanes… however they’re in the process of building a new toll road in the median & converting the current highway into a feeder road with all the hassles of stop lights. At present, it’s a 45 minute non stop trip on a publically paid for highway. How would P-law handle the govt changing our current highway into a toll road?”—Clinton McLaggan

    It’s a debatable and technical point, however, P-Constitution prohibits toll roads. While at first blush it would appear possible under natural law, its a violation of two criteria: first, the only necessary right of a commons – of movement in two dimensional space, and secondly: it’s open to rent seeking – a fee without contributing to production. In other words if you want a road you can build one, but you can’t create such a commons and extract tolls for it. Same for bridges. Not for ferries.

    NOTE:

    One of P’s prohibitions is non-exclusory use of property. Meaning you can’t wall someone out of access to territory. This is a very old common law tradition. If you want to wall something off you have to provide passage along the borders.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 21:10:00 UTC

  • Maybe you don’t get this implication, but our genome is a commons of our kin gro

    Maybe you don’t get this implication, but our genome is a commons of our kin group.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 15:46:00 UTC

  • Well, there can be no global commons, because there are no unowned (non-state) c

    Well, there can be no global commons, because there are no unowned (non-state) commons – that would be a contradiction in terms.

    As for imposition by light pollution that’s just an ordinary violation of tort of the commons resolvable in a court of conflict between regions.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 12:58:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225765763962765317

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225764243703828482

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225764243703828482

  • The only thing that melts in the american pot is rule of law, trust, the commons

    The only thing that melts in the american pot is rule of law, trust, the commons, and the civil society

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-06 18:04:00 UTC

  • PRODUCTION OF WHAT? Commons, Goods, Services, Information, and Incentives. The p

    PRODUCTION OF WHAT?

    Commons, Goods, Services, Information, and Incentives.

    The problem demarcation between scientists that supply information and ‘intellectuals’ that provide incentives unbound by science: truth and reciprocity.

    |PRODUCTION| Commons > Consumption: Goods > Services > Information > Incentives

    Are there any good intellectuals? Or are they all priests selling false promise baiting the people into hazard?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-06 07:34:00 UTC

  • Truth is a Commons in the West. Limiting public speech to the Testimonial and Re

    Truth is a Commons in the West. Limiting public speech to the Testimonial and Reciprocal licenses VOLUNTARY TRADE (argument) but prohibits INVOLUNTARY HARMS. The duel between sovereign men b/c insult prohibited untruths. We failed to clarify that free speech meant Free Testimony.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:09:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225073865937838082

    Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225072500037636100

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ScottAdamsSays WESTERN CIV’S EXPLANATION: Testimony: Jury > Thang > Senate > Multiple Houses > Public Speech. In the Western Tradition of Sovereignty the only reason to tolerate free speech is if it is Testimony (Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Reciprocity) – else violence licensed.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225072500037636100

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ScottAdamsSays WESTERN CIV’S EXPLANATION: Testimony: Jury > Thang > Senate > Multiple Houses > Public Speech. In the Western Tradition of Sovereignty the only reason to tolerate free speech is if it is Testimony (Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Reciprocity) – else violence licensed.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225072500037636100

  • Learn from your betters. It’s the greatest contribution you can make to the comm

    Learn from your betters. It’s the greatest contribution you can make to the commons, and your ignorance the greatest harm to the commons and the polity.

    Lesson one: GSRRM is an admission of ignorance and deceit. https://t.co/Aq4zf3QwZU

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 14:45:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223980831062007808

    Reply addressees: @FloraMaeBaker @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto @BarackObama @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223980266642911232

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FloraMaeBaker @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto @BarackObama @realDonaldTrump Yes I do. I just built companies in USA, Canada, UK, Ukraine, and did business around the world.

    And yes, I am literate, sophisticated, educated in the arts, economics, technology, and sciences, and successful in business and philosophy – so I have the resulting vocabulary.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223980266642911232

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @FloraMaeBaker @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto @BarackObama @realDonaldTrump Yes I do. I just built companies in USA, Canada, UK, Ukraine, and did business around the world.

    And yes, I am literate, sophisticated, educated in the arts, economics, technology, and sciences, and successful in business and philosophy – so I have the resulting vocabulary.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223980266642911232

  • So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was institut

    So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 01:58:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481

    Reply addressees: @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792

  • This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states p

    This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics;reduces power distance in producing those commons;allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 16:32:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282961216430084

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282960113307648

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    This restores the original intent of the constitution which is a continental military and trade organization, and treasury and insurer of last resort, with norms, policy, and laws serving the interests of polites as the british empire;a weak federal government as was the church.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282960113307648

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    This restores the original intent of the constitution which is a continental military and trade organization, and treasury and insurer of last resort, with norms, policy, and laws serving the interests of polites as the british empire;a weak federal government as was the church.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282960113307648