Regarding: Alcohol, Pot, Other Drugs, Sex, Promiscuity, Prostitution, any unregulated behavior, attention-causing, or Hedonism in general – there is a difference between illegality (prohibition), legalization (private and out of the commons) and commercializing (in the commons).
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-30 15:40:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255884734430875648
Commercializing it in the commons has had a negative consequence in every city that’s tried it. Keeping it a ‘craft’ outside of the commons wouldn’t produce the externalities. The difference between legalizing and commercializing. ie: Legalizing prostitution vs commercializing.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-30 15:36:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255883649343520775
Reply addressees: @honestpolitic16 @NickJFuentes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255881325858390017
(a) Pot or in the commons? Evidence is yes, conservatives are right, (b) Being gay or socializing gay lifestyle? Evidence is yes, (c) Welcoming hostile foreigners? Evidence is yes. CONSERVATIVE = EMPIRICAL AND SKEPTICAL of that which has not been demonstrated empirically.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-30 15:23:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255880433520259073
Reply addressees: @NickJFuentes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255735006405832716
DISAMBIGUATION: ILLEGAL, LEGAL, COMMERCIAL, COMMONS
Regarding: Alcohol, Pot, Other Drugs, Sex, Promiscuity, Prostitution, any unregulated behavior, attention-causing, or Hedonism (unregulated behavior) in general – there is a difference between illegality (prohibition), legalization (private and out of the commons) and commercializing (in the commons).
Many if not all unregulated behavior can and should be removed from the commons. What people do in private is their own business.
We share the commons.
We don’t share private spaces.
Prohibited(illegal) >
… Private(outside of commons) >
… … Craft Production (for home and friend consumption)
… … … Commercial (sourced in and marketed in markets) >
… … … … Commons (demonstrated in commons) >
… … … … … Monument-Memorial (heralded in commons)
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-30 11:42:00 UTC
GRID EXPLAINING COMMONS-ISM
GRID:
……………………CHILD……………………….
ANARCHIST …….VS ….COMMUNIST
(heterogeneous, no commons, just consumption)
(diasporic, tribal, imperial subjects, “the men will do it”)
no capitalization ………no capitaliz… https://t.co/HXCy1VvKkI
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 12:16:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255108725964247040
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/94459593_268438137887680_2416887417261785088_o_268438131221014.jpg GRID EXPLAINING COMMONS-ISM
GRID:
……………………CHILD……………………….
ANARCHIST …….VS ….COMMUNIST
(heterogeneous, no commons, just consumption)
(diasporic, tribal, imperial subjects, “the men will do it”)
no capitalization ………no capitalization
individual…………………collective
inequality…………………equality
.
MALE………………VS…………………….FEMALE
.
inequality…………………equality
familial…………………….collective familial
max capitalization ……max consumption
(landed, national, self rule, “we’re the men who do it”)
(homogenous, commons, over consumption )
COMMONSIST …VS …SOCIALIST
……………………PARENT……………………….
Humans have very comprehensible differences in instincts, and evolved to express those very comprehensible instincts, and then to make up stories justifying them.GRID EXPLAINING COMMONS-ISM
GRID:
……………………CHILD……………………….
ANARCHIST …….VS ….COMMUNIST
(heterogeneous, no commons, just consumption)
(diasporic, tribal, imperial subjects, “the men will do it”)
no capitalization ………no capitalization
individual…………………collective
inequality…………………equality
.
MALE………………VS…………………….FEMALE
.
inequality…………………equality
familial…………………….collective familial
max capitalization ……max consumption
(landed, national, self rule, “we’re the men who do it”)
(homogenous, commons, over consumption )
COMMONSIST …VS …SOCIALIST
……………………PARENT……………………….
Humans have very comprehensible differences in instincts, and evolved to express those very comprehensible instincts, and then to make up stories justifying them.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 08:15:00 UTC
“THE ECONOMICS OF NATIONAL COMMONS-ISM”
attn: @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]
1) Commons are a non consumable capitalization from which everyone benefits – a park where you can raise small children cuts the cost of yard ownership for example. Lacking a park where you can raise small children increases the cost of homes and yards, driving people out of high investment parenting.
2) Commons solve the problem of high investment parenting, without requiring high familial economic investment by every family. Families buy access to commons by high investment parenting, which creates incentive for the production of commons and their high returns.
3) We use high investment parenting in the production of high investment commons. We use high investment commons to facilitate high investment parenting.
4) This is what the middle working, and lower working classes sense is being stolen from them – the ability to use commons to produce high investment parenting. Best example is that they can’t afford to move away from malcontents by denying them access.
5) Low investment parenting immigrants and classes, decrease the incentive to produce commons that are then consumed for purposes of other than raising families. Low investment parenting immigrants and classes increase consumption that is upwardly redistributable to the financial sector, and decrease production of commons as redistribution to
6) Elites (advertising, media, financial, academic, political), will happily consume profits and income instead of investing in commons if lower working, working, and middle classes tolerate it.
7) The laboring, lower working, working, middle, and increasingly upper middle class, will only tolerate it until the low hanging fruit of consumption has been exhausted, and the demand for commons is restored.
8) Christianity is exceptional at producing respect for commons because behavior in the church environment (suppression of impulse) and the sacredness of the properties, extend to the commons.
9) In the absence of universal christian indoctrination we must us the law to suppress consumption (destruction) of the incentive to produce high trust, ‘sacred’ commons, suitable for the raising of children. And exporting ‘exploratory’ (teen, young adult) behavior (pre-maturity) to labor (markets) sport(competition) and external (wild) commons.Updated Apr 27, 2020, 9:38 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 21:38:00 UTC
British historians, american entrepreneurs, swiss bankers and government, german education and engineering, scandinavian commons, italian art and design, russian literature and warfare, french bureaucratic nationalism, jewish doctors, spanish lifestyle, polish community, russian-belarusian-ukrainian men and women.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 11:04:00 UTC
WE ARE TRYING TO ARTICULATE “NATIONAL COMMONS-ISM”
by Luke Weinhagen
I have a suspicion that what many are grasping at within NatSoc is not a socialization of the economy but rather a commonization (not communization) of the government.
This is what the west was aimed at solving but without full-accounting under P’s complete description of property, government became just another marketable commodity under globalist capitalism.
What we are really trying to articulate is a form of National Commonsism.
The resistance to “socializing” any part of our civic under our current model of “governance as commodity” is it effectively means selling whatever was socialized to big interest and international agents. There is no trust.
National Commonsism == Kinship Capitalism == reciprocity protected by full-accounting
—
CD: Always count on luke for genius.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 10:53:00 UTC
Three Podcasts coming:
1) E0006 – On Reciprocity, The Natural Law, Rule, Government, and Commons
2) E0007 – Crossing the Chasm and the Choice
3) E0008 – On The Past, Present, and Future of Marriage
then
N) E000N – The Introduction to the Constitution
Now if someone can just bind and gag the little old lady long enough that I can edit them … lol.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 10:46:00 UTC