Curt Doolittle

Theme: Commons

  • Yes, Norms Are Common Property

    YES, NORMS ARE COMMON PROPERTY by Martin Stepan

    —“So if such a thing as via-positiva norms do exist, is it possible for there to be violations of reciprocity by not adhering to said via positive norms? Or would this just be considered to be a violation of someone’s notion of the “the good”, and therefore intangible property if they show a willingness to defend it?”—Michael Bernard

    As long as those norms remain someone’s demonstrated interest, you can violate reciprocity by subverting them. You can always go live somewhere else where they’ll have you and norms will be more to your liking.

  • Yes, Norms Are Common Property

    YES, NORMS ARE COMMON PROPERTY by Martin Stepan

    —“So if such a thing as via-positiva norms do exist, is it possible for there to be violations of reciprocity by not adhering to said via positive norms? Or would this just be considered to be a violation of someone’s notion of the “the good”, and therefore intangible property if they show a willingness to defend it?”—Michael Bernard

    As long as those norms remain someone’s demonstrated interest, you can violate reciprocity by subverting them. You can always go live somewhere else where they’ll have you and norms will be more to your liking.

  • Oh… Wait. Law is what prohibits people like you from violence, harm, theft, fr

    Oh… Wait. Law is what prohibits people like you from violence, harm, theft, fraud, baiting into hazard, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, conspiracy, corruption, usurpation, conversion, immigration, displacement, conquest, and genocide.

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471

  • Oh… Wait. Law is what prohibits people like you from violence, harm, theft, fr

    Oh… Wait. Law is what prohibits people like you from violence, harm, theft, fraud, baiting into hazard, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, conspiracy, corruption, usurpation, conversion, immigration, displacement, conquest, and genocide.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 21:37:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267571065993285633

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267570518510665728

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JayMan471 Law is what prohibits people like me and mine from profiting by conquering, killing, enslaving, enserving, tax farming, usury farming, selling theology, philosophy, ideology,pseudoscience, false promises of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws to people like you.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1267570518510665728

  • There is nothing wrong with black people that self-governance would not cure. Wh

    There is nothing wrong with black people that self-governance would not cure. While all peoples are compatible in markets, not all people are compatible in neighborhoods, commons, education, and the workforce.

    And so, you ‘idealistic idiots’ are well meaning but cruel fools.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 20:06:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267548211494948865

    Reply addressees: @JodyHighRollr @RumorDr @essential_1492

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267547805654159362

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JodyHighRollr @RumorDr @essential_1492 Under normal conditions, they’d evolve traditions, norms, manners, ethics and morals within the community that would control behavior at their rate of maturity. Under FORCED INTEGRATION we prohibit the formation of ingroup manners, ethics, morals, institutions, and elites.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1267547805654159362

  • There is nothing wrong with black people that self-governance would not cure. Wh

    There is nothing wrong with black people that self-governance would not cure. While all peoples are compatible in markets, not all people are compatible in neighborhoods, commons, education, and the workforce.

    And so, you ‘idealistic idiots’ are well meaning but cruel fools.

    Reply addressees: @JodyHighRollr @RumorDr @essential_1492

  • The Reason for Laws Against Child Abuse

    The Reason for Laws Against Child Abuse https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-reason-for-laws-against-child-abuse/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 16:40:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267496318542413826

  • The Reason for Laws Against Child Abuse

    The Reason for Laws Against Child Abuse https://t.co/jlYrpXVy27

  • The Reason for Laws Against Child Abuse

    THE REASON FOR LAWS AGAINST CHILD ABUSE

    —“Raising a family is an act of patriotism and sacrifice. After all… Children are commons. They affect the entire polity. And they are the most feasible, concrete way for we mortals to transcend. So let’s give them a reason to be proud of us once we get to infinity.”—José Francisco Mayora —“Which is the reason why we we have any laws against child abuse. It’s not just family insuring the children and the polity from the children, but polity also insures children, even from their own families.”—Martin Štěpán

  • The Reason for Laws Against Child Abuse

    THE REASON FOR LAWS AGAINST CHILD ABUSE

    —“Raising a family is an act of patriotism and sacrifice. After all… Children are commons. They affect the entire polity. And they are the most feasible, concrete way for we mortals to transcend. So let’s give them a reason to be proud of us once we get to infinity.”—José Francisco Mayora —“Which is the reason why we we have any laws against child abuse. It’s not just family insuring the children and the polity from the children, but polity also insures children, even from their own families.”—Martin Štěpán