THE REASON REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) we have a non-neutral policing, (f) no juridical defense (g) and our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war. (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +1T per year in commons. (j) We are forcibly involuntarily associated in polities, politics, business, community, education, and neighborhood, against our will, against our interests, preventing us from customizing commons, to the division and detriment of all, in the greatest failed policy in history. What’s the difference between right and left? Right, Generative Adversarial, Capitalizing(meritocratic) Eugenic Adaptation of Quality, versus Left, Consensus Harmonious, Parasitic(equalitarian) Dysgenic Devolution of Quantity. We are incompatible because our first causes (moral intuitions and reproductive strategies) are polar opposites. They are the extremes of the male hierarchical and female equalitarian reproductive strategies. The Left’s entire doctrine is science denial: a revolt against the Darwinian explanation for the success of western civ: a revolt against truth, formal, physical, and evolutionary laws. The Religious Rights only pseudoscience is only of natural law’s origin not its content.We are incompatible because the technological innovations of european modernity created the wealth and therefore the opportunity for individual pursuit of INSTINCTS – which was the opposite of convergence the (feminine) left predicted. The right continues convergence to evolutionary adaptability, and the left rebels by attempting to converge on evolutionary non-adaptability (regression). The right to harmony in adaptive duty by the production of agency, and the left to harmony in avoidance of adaptive duty by avoidance of the production of agency. The result is the parasitic elite, a parasitic underclass who escape or cannot compete in evolutinary markets, against the productive, laboring, working, and middle classes who successfully compete in markets.We’re incompatible because Right Merit Eugenic vs Left Equal Dysgenic are incompatible, and irreconcilable.We’re incompatible and we must Separate or War.We Have a Thorough Constitutional Reform Ready It will appease the vast majority of center-left, center, and center-right, at the cost of the globalists, the financial sector, and the deep state. It is as great an innovation in natural law and rights and obligations under natural law over our existing constitution as our existing constitution was over the unwritten english constitution, and it reverses the errors of the French Revolution. It has taken 20 years of tireless effort. And it will be done early in the new year. Bring about a political revolution instead of a bloody one. Join Us: https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/
Theme: Commons
-
The Reason Revolution Comes
THE REASON REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) we have a non-neutral policing, (f) no juridical defense (g) and our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war. (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +1T per year in commons. (j) We are forcibly involuntarily associated in polities, politics, business, community, education, and neighborhood, against our will, against our interests, preventing us from customizing commons, to the division and detriment of all, in the greatest failed policy in history. What’s the difference between right and left? Right, Generative Adversarial, Capitalizing(meritocratic) Eugenic Adaptation of Quality, versus Left, Consensus Harmonious, Parasitic(equalitarian) Dysgenic Devolution of Quantity. We are incompatible because our first causes (moral intuitions and reproductive strategies) are polar opposites. They are the extremes of the male hierarchical and female equalitarian reproductive strategies. The Left’s entire doctrine is science denial: a revolt against the Darwinian explanation for the success of western civ: a revolt against truth, formal, physical, and evolutionary laws. The Religious Rights only pseudoscience is only of natural law’s origin not its content.We are incompatible because the technological innovations of european modernity created the wealth and therefore the opportunity for individual pursuit of INSTINCTS – which was the opposite of convergence the (feminine) left predicted. The right continues convergence to evolutionary adaptability, and the left rebels by attempting to converge on evolutionary non-adaptability (regression). The right to harmony in adaptive duty by the production of agency, and the left to harmony in avoidance of adaptive duty by avoidance of the production of agency. The result is the parasitic elite, a parasitic underclass who escape or cannot compete in evolutinary markets, against the productive, laboring, working, and middle classes who successfully compete in markets.We’re incompatible because Right Merit Eugenic vs Left Equal Dysgenic are incompatible, and irreconcilable.We’re incompatible and we must Separate or War.We Have a Thorough Constitutional Reform Ready It will appease the vast majority of center-left, center, and center-right, at the cost of the globalists, the financial sector, and the deep state. It is as great an innovation in natural law and rights and obligations under natural law over our existing constitution as our existing constitution was over the unwritten english constitution, and it reverses the errors of the French Revolution. It has taken 20 years of tireless effort. And it will be done early in the new year. Bring about a political revolution instead of a bloody one. Join Us: https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/
-
REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, o
REVOLUTION COMES
(a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) we have a non-neutral policing, (f) no juridical defense (g) and our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-11 15:46:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337423563960295426
-
A King Is Actually a Check on Oligarchy
–“A king is actually a check on oligarchy.”– Martin Stepan
1. As we increase in complexity and divide and distribute the labor of governance (producing commons), we must maintain rule (policing) in the court and the judge of last resort: a monarchy.
The Laws of the Universe < The Natural Law < The Military < The Law < King < Court < Govt < The People 2. When we conflate the via-positiva and via-negativa functions of political systems ignore and forget their natural division of labor: Military (order), Rule (law), Judgement (king and court), Commons (government), and the People (production, reproduction) 3. This hierarchy Military< Law< King< Court < Government < People isn’t ‘relative’ or ‘arbitrary’ it is the scientifically optimum method of political order given the formal, physical, natural, evolutionary laws. 4. Interference in this government is an act of war against man.
-
A King Is Actually a Check on Oligarchy
–“A king is actually a check on oligarchy.”– Martin Stepan
1. As we increase in complexity and divide and distribute the labor of governance (producing commons), we must maintain rule (policing) in the court and the judge of last resort: a monarchy.
The Laws of the Universe < The Natural Law < The Military < The Law < King < Court < Govt < The People 2. When we conflate the via-positiva and via-negativa functions of political systems ignore and forget their natural division of labor: Military (order), Rule (law), Judgement (king and court), Commons (government), and the People (production, reproduction) 3. This hierarchy Military< Law< King< Court < Government < People isn’t ‘relative’ or ‘arbitrary’ it is the scientifically optimum method of political order given the formal, physical, natural, evolutionary laws. 4. Interference in this government is an act of war against man.
-
(Shifts from common capitalizing in the commons to common production of consumpt
(Shifts from common capitalizing in the commons to common production of consumption, depriving us of the multiples provided by commons.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-09 19:13:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336750823985000448
Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336748557882118145
-
“A king is actually a check on oligarchy.”– Martin Stepan 1. As we increase in
–“A king is actually a check on oligarchy.”– Martin Stepan
1. As we increase in complexity and divide and distribute the labor of governance (producing commons), we must maintain rule (policing) in the court and the judge of last resort: a monarchy.
Law < King < Court < Govt
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-09 16:21:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336707452839071744
-
Sincerity is there. In tort law (natural law) you are guilty for failure of due
Sincerity is there. In tort law (natural law) you are guilty for failure of due diligence. In matters of the informational commons, platonism is a crime. I use math because it’s the example most are familiar with.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-09 01:55:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336489519944765440
Reply addressees: @EuclidsPoint
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336488927960686594
-
(4 of 6) … c) Enforcement of the Law of Non-Aggression – extending self-defens
(4 of 6)
… c) Enforcement of the Law of Non-Aggression – extending self-defense, standing one’s ground, castle doctrine, and civil defense of the commons – licensing shoot-to-kill on the first demonstration of aggression whether by obstruction, challenge, threat, or force.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-07 18:30:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336015192807890944
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336015191398604801
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
(3 of 6)
… b) The criminalization of all attempts at suppression of testimonial, truthful, reciprocal, empirical speech, and licensing of extrajudicial punishment to cease them.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1336015191398604801
-
3. … under our Constitution of Rule of Law by Natural Law, our rights within i
3. … under our Constitution of Rule of Law by Natural Law, our rights within it, and those institutions to defend our life, property, and commons – restoring rule by the People For the People as our Declaration and Constitution, our ancestors, Nature, and Natures’ God Demand.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-07 17:21:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335997952402345984
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335997948380008453
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
2. If this Government Refuses To Rule, To Govern, to protect life, property, and commons; If this government has abandoned us; Our Law, and Gods Law; Then we have no choice but to declare this Government incompetent and unmade; And to set about restoring our Rule of Law, …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1335997948380008453