RT @curtdoolittle: @_RyanClarke_ @Mitch_Mc_Turtle @drjanaway Some of us take responsibility for the commons.
If you won’t. And you don’t. T…
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-11 15:26:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613195669027815425
Some of us take responsibility for the commons.
If you won’t. And you don’t. Then perhaps you should consider remaining a spectator and not counseling the rest of us spectate, while millennia of gains of our high trust civilization are undermined by Anti-Darwinian infantilization
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-11 15:23:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613195021817192448
Reply addressees: @_RyanClarke_ @Mitch_Mc_Turtle @drjanaway
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613187340524032000
Not at all, little one. Especially because the truth can never be classified as defamatory.
You should work on emotional maturity to place the value to the commons higher than the emotional burden of change (adulting) we demand of other.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-08 14:17:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612091231428829185
Reply addressees: @LOLANA @georealpolitik
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1612070750869127169
2. “.. production of commons in markets for commons consisting of a parliament for the people, a house/senate for the regions, an independent judiciary under the natural, common, concurrent law (above) and a monarchy as judge of last resort in defense of that law.”
Perfect govt.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-08 00:40:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611885430764355584
Reply addressees: @_Plac3_hold3r @georealpolitik
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611883484619968515
Correct. But we are, if we are responsible for the commons, at least tentatively obligated to prevent the harm he can cause because of his failure to resolve his issues.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-07 22:01:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611845517763297280
Reply addressees: @NeryssaP
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611844930095415296
Yet the Jewish tradition as the female intuition, resists responsibility for the commons at the expense of identity and separation that provides group coherence, in those host civilizations that will tolerate their industrialization of baiting into hazard (irresponsibility).
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-07 00:54:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611526733349412867
Reply addressees: @nathancofnas @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611293877276745732
13. ANd given that males seek status by innovation and adaptation and responsibility for commons and women by evasion of responsibility for commons as status (hyperconsumption), seeking it through males, the rate of change of male irreciprocity (crime) will outpace female.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 16:56:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611406266596737034
Reply addressees: @InTruthVictori1 @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611398892498599948
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@InTruthVictori1 @ConceptualJames 1. Again, there are ~750M ethnic Europeans, and ~15M Jews. However, this is distortive. If the smart fraction is all that matters (it is), and the culture they’re working in. that’s 1% 750M across all disciplines, and 2% of 15M in ~verbal disciplines w/ shared group strategy.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1611398892498599948
16. All
You cannot persuade criminals, esp. who enagage in indirect crimes against the commons through harm to individual reputation and status, to truthful knowledge, and to institutions of cultural production of responsibility.
You can only outlaw and punish the criminals.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 15:22:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611382595287420928
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611202996326600704
7. Just as a minority of women will defect to masculine systematizing and moral demand for responsibility for self and commons. And many women will do so once they have three or more children, and grasp the cost of ‘undisciplined commons behavior’ on the regulation of children.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 14:55:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611375949127290881
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611202996326600704
Don’t lie. Limiting to one child achieves the same end over a longer period of time. Ending welfare, common property, child support, alimony will help. Eliminating prohibition on correction of genetic defects is very costly but will eventually overcome public superstition.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-03 02:01:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1610093999796224000
Reply addressees: @freebirdle @charlescwcooke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1610093172113154049