Theme: Commons

  • THE HIGH TAX OF TRUTH TELLING It is a terribly high tax – a payment into the com

    THE HIGH TAX OF TRUTH TELLING

    It is a terribly high tax – a payment into the commons – to speak the truth, to speak it truthfully, to promise, to hold one’s promise, to take only what is voluntarily exchanged, productive, and free of negative externality. That is why no other people does it. No one other than Germanic man. It is terribly expensive. And why we do it may be traditional, or genetic, a combination of the two.

    Over the past century and a half, the counter-enlightenment efforts of the Germans and the Jews have taught us to lie again, through the use of new media, just as they forced us to stop learning the truth by closing the greek schools and then forcibly taught us to lie in the first place, via the new media of the church and bible. We rescued ourselves from the system of lies after more than a millennium of enforced ignorance and deception. And then the anglo evangelical puritans, and now, after the Germans have been conquered, anglo neo-puritans, have allied with the Cosmopolitan Jews and taught us to lie, justified lying as in the common good, ridiculed us for telling the truth, taken over our academy (seminaries) and our government, and our media (churches), and forced our children to listen to lies, to lie, and to obey lies.

    Truth telling is enough. With courts of common law, property rights including the physical, normative, and informational commons, and the requirement for productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality – and its inverse: the prohibition on involuntary imposition of costs – we can, each of us, police the division of knowledge and labor at our own discretion, according to our fragmentary knowledge and ability, and use truth and violence to construct our unique, prosperous, innovative, moral order, and eradicate from government the parasitism we have eliminated from tribe, and locality, and centralized in the bureaucratic state.

    This is what the high tax of truth telling, and the equally high tax of using violence to enforce truth telling buys us: the most prosperous and innovative society on earth, that leads man toward his potential of being the god he imagines directs him, but who, if exists, seeks only to succeed him, as do all parents.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-01-06 04:26:00 UTC

  • TAXES FOR THE COMMONS I have no problem paying for commons – when they’re in fac

    TAXES FOR THE COMMONS

    I have no problem paying for commons – when they’re in fact commons. I have a big problem with paying extortionary rents. And I have an even larger problem with paying for damage to the commons that we have built over millennia. People have no problem paying taxes that they agree with and many problems paying for taxes that they don’t agree with. The solution of course is to let people pay for what they agree with and not for what they don’t agree with. Representatives are for sale. Remove the agent from the principle agent problem. (Conversely I have an equally large problem with free riders on the commons.)

    I think I’m going to put together a web application with a budget model of the US Government and your extant taxes, and we’ll see how people would vote their money.

    That is a wonderful social science experiment. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-15 07:05:00 UTC

  • Well, of course you can be wealthier if you don’t pay the costs of holding a mon

    Well, of course you can be wealthier if you don’t pay the costs of holding a monopoly on a territory. Free riding is profitable.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-04 06:14:00 UTC

  • IF POLITICAL SPEECH IS RENDERED CALCULABLE THEN WHAT? what happens if public int

    IF POLITICAL SPEECH IS RENDERED CALCULABLE THEN WHAT?

    what happens if public intellectuals can only construct commons instead of power?

    I mean. Seriously. You aren’t going to stop people from wanting to organize to change the world. You aren’t going to stop people from changing it to suit their biases, interests, class and kin. You can stop them from lying – or at least make it much harder for them to lie. You can limit them to construction of commons, and exchanges between groups. You can try hard to limit the obscurantism that they rely upon do achieve discounts (lying again). But they will keep on being human (gossiping).

    I think it’s pretty hard to engage in corruption under a Propertarian constitution. But it isn’t impossible. Man will always invent new means of lying to obtain discounts.

    On the other hand, I think that since the only outlet that is economically inexpensive to follow is that of voluntary exchange, then I can see most efforts returning to civic rather than political life: that we try to construct truths and commons and trades rather than lies, and rents, and thefts.

    This is what prohibiting lying does for us. This is what Propertarianism allows us to do.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-29 04:12:00 UTC

  • 1) HEROISM and SOVEREIGNTY(Competition), 2) TECHNOLOGY, 3) PROPERTY, 4) TRUTH an

    1) HEROISM and SOVEREIGNTY(Competition), 2) TECHNOLOGY, 3) PROPERTY, 4) TRUTH and PROMISE(CONTRACT), 5) JURY, 6) THE HANDS-OFF COMMONS (Sacred Commons).

    That is ‘our way’. Nial Ferguson’s six killer apps are consequences (Pareto’s Derivations) not CAUSES (Hegelian differences) nor instincts and intuitions (Pareto’s ‘Residues’).

    The western difference is our struggle to speak the truth before the jury of our peers.

    It is NOT majority rule.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-22 02:38:00 UTC

  • “THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRUGGLE TO SPEAK THE TRUTH” I think, that this is second onl

    “THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRUGGLE TO SPEAK THE TRUTH”

    I think, that this is second only to heroism as the uniquely western value.

    Truth is extremely expensive commons to produce. It is perhaps the most expensive commons to produce. Which is why no one else has produced it. And why even our own people often mount resistance movements against it.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-22 02:17:00 UTC

  • Reproduction Requires Constraint

    **[I]t’s very hard to produce commons if you’re producing offspring who have no alternative but to parasite upon those commons.**

  • Reproduction Requires Constraint

    **[I]t’s very hard to produce commons if you’re producing offspring who have no alternative but to parasite upon those commons.**

  • **It’s very hard to produce commons if you’re producing offspring who have no al

    **It’s very hard to produce commons if you’re producing offspring who have no alternative but to parasite upon those commons.**


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-18 01:38:00 UTC

  • Great conversation with Eli Harman today. I tried to cover how voluntary exchang

    Great conversation with Eli Harman today. I tried to cover how voluntary exchange between compatible moral biases in the choice of investments in commons, provides us with an information system that facilitates utilization of the temporal division of labor between the biases, in the same way that prices provide us with an information system about the wants of others.

    This is one of the more important insights you can get from Propertarianism.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-14 09:10:00 UTC