Legal dissent is is useful only in prohibiting the construction of a voluntary commons if it imposes costs upon the extant assets of others.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:15:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637599502375985152
Majority Assent is helpful in the allocation of scarce resources to prioritized ends.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:14:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637599102688198656
The purpose of Propertarian political institutions is permissive: to create a market for commons by abandoning majority assent.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:13:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637598991241347072
Any advance in political order must improve the ability of increasingly disparate groups to construct mutually beneficial commons.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:12:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637598614508994560
Legal dissent is is useful only in prohibiting the construction of a voluntary commons if it imposes costs upon the extant assets of others.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 08:15:00 UTC
The purpose of Propertarian political institutions is permissive: to create a market for commons by abandoning majority assent.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 08:13:00 UTC
Any advance in political order must improve the ability of increasingly disparate groups to construct mutually beneficial commons.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 08:12:00 UTC
[A]ll we need is monopoly Rule. Defense (military), Rule (rule of law), Government (market production of commons), Market (market production of goods and services). Why, instead of debating over whether to institute a universal socialist(consumptive), libertarian(productive), or conservative(accumulative), social(normative), economic(productive), and political(commons) order, do we not institute universal rule of law affirming property-en-toto, and let people choose the social, economic, and political order that they will ‘join’, and then use houses of government to conduct contractual trades between those classes? Why can’t socialists redistribute to one another, libertarians invest in production, and conservatives accumulate capital, and we conduct trades with one another in order to achieve our common ends? Why is monopoly necessary? We have technology today that can enforce these contracts. Why? Because we have electronic money, and the ability to issue multiple currencies for multiple purposes. In essence, creating trade policy internally between classes as well as trade policy externally between polities. Good government isn’t a problem. We can do it. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
[A]ll we need is monopoly Rule. Defense (military), Rule (rule of law), Government (market production of commons), Market (market production of goods and services). Why, instead of debating over whether to institute a universal socialist(consumptive), libertarian(productive), or conservative(accumulative), social(normative), economic(productive), and political(commons) order, do we not institute universal rule of law affirming property-en-toto, and let people choose the social, economic, and political order that they will ‘join’, and then use houses of government to conduct contractual trades between those classes? Why can’t socialists redistribute to one another, libertarians invest in production, and conservatives accumulate capital, and we conduct trades with one another in order to achieve our common ends? Why is monopoly necessary? We have technology today that can enforce these contracts. Why? Because we have electronic money, and the ability to issue multiple currencies for multiple purposes. In essence, creating trade policy internally between classes as well as trade policy externally between polities. Good government isn’t a problem. We can do it. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
[M]y “thing” is truth. Propertarianism solves the problem of cooperation in morally heterogeneous societies by the construction of a market for commons just as we constructed a market for goods and services: but incrementally suppressing parasitism in the production of commons (government) just as we incrementally suppressed parasitism in the production of goods and services (the market). In that sense I am a radical(progressive), and propertarianism is radical (an alteration of the status quo. That propertarianism alters the status quo by suppressing the parasitism of dysgenic socialists, is either an improvement in truth or a devolution of free riding.