Curt Doolittle

Theme: Commons

  • Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the common

    Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the commons) is an excellent idea, as long as (a) this does not affect the monarchy and the military, and (b) as long as it is not asymmetric among the classes. In other words, those who have greater responsibilities and those who have lesser responsibilities must both agree. The real problem of democracy was (a) women and (b) underclasses and (c) vast immigration of underclass (including the catholics who are white.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:06:00 UTC

  • Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the common

    Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the commons) is an excellent idea, as long as (a) this does not affect the monarchy and the military, and (b) as long as it is not asymmetric among the classes. In other words, those who have greater responsibilities and those who have lesser responsibilities must both agree. The real problem of democracy was (a) women and (b) underclasses and (c) vast immigration of underclass (including the catholics who are white.)

  • The Parasitisms That Compete With Reciprocity

    Marxism = parasitism upon private property. Libertarianism = Parasitism upon commons. NeoConservatism = Parasitism upon Genes, Traditions, and Institutions. Authoritarianism masks the underlying theft, which is why I talk not about the authority (which each sector justified) but about the thefts (which are very hard to). Same with economics. We talk about whether they aer scientific or not but we do not talk about the thefts that occur, versus the trades that would be possible under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity. Theft is not an opinion. “Good” is an opinion.

  • THE PARASITISMS THAT COMPETE WITH RECIPROCITY Marxism = parasitism upon private

    THE PARASITISMS THAT COMPETE WITH RECIPROCITY

    Marxism = parasitism upon private property.

    Libertarianism = Parasitism upon commons.

    NeoConservatism = Parasitism upon Genes, Traditions, and Institutions.

    Authoritarianism masks the underlying theft, which is why I talk not about the authority (which each sector justified) but about the thefts (which are very hard to).

    Same with economics. We talk about whether they aer scientific or not but we do not talk about the thefts that occur, versus the trades that would be possible under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity.

    Theft is not an opinion. “Good” is an opinion.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:41:00 UTC

  • The Parasitisms That Compete With Reciprocity

    Marxism = parasitism upon private property. Libertarianism = Parasitism upon commons. NeoConservatism = Parasitism upon Genes, Traditions, and Institutions. Authoritarianism masks the underlying theft, which is why I talk not about the authority (which each sector justified) but about the thefts (which are very hard to). Same with economics. We talk about whether they aer scientific or not but we do not talk about the thefts that occur, versus the trades that would be possible under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity. Theft is not an opinion. “Good” is an opinion.

  • Neoconservatism(Prohibition on Sovereignty), Libertarianism Prohibition on the c

    Neoconservatism(Prohibition on Sovereignty), Libertarianism Prohibition on the commons), and Marxism (prohibition upon property) are just three class directed methods of parasitism – The Pilpul of Abrahamic Religion in Pseudoscientific Verse.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-02 23:56:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969723240296927237

    Reply addressees: @Neocon_Pundit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/967949691617816576

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/967949691617816576

  • What Is The Difference Between Civil Society And Social Movements?

    CIVIL: ACTIVISTS PAY FOR COMMONS, SOCIAL: ACTIVISTS FORCE OTHERS TO PAY FOR COMMONS.

    Civil: Personal Choice. The Civil Society (meaning voluntary organization of commons) Activists Pay.

    Civil society is the “aggregate of non-governmental organizations and institutions that manifest interests and will of citizens.”

    Social: Political Force. The political society (meaning involuntary organization of commons by political, military means.) Political activism. Activists Make Others Pay.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-civil-society-and-social-movements

  • What Is The Difference Between Civil Society And Social Movements?

    CIVIL: ACTIVISTS PAY FOR COMMONS, SOCIAL: ACTIVISTS FORCE OTHERS TO PAY FOR COMMONS.

    Civil: Personal Choice. The Civil Society (meaning voluntary organization of commons) Activists Pay.

    Civil society is the “aggregate of non-governmental organizations and institutions that manifest interests and will of citizens.”

    Social: Political Force. The political society (meaning involuntary organization of commons by political, military means.) Political activism. Activists Make Others Pay.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-civil-society-and-social-movements

  • William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not mate

    William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not materialized into the commons. Personally held opinions which cannot be constructed into a viable argument or claim are either premature or presumption. We can take from this the true nature of the popular habit of airing one’s opinion to peers: infantilism by gossip. Now, OTOH, if a group of persons is exploring a matter then contributions are transmitted and received by the same discretion (reciprocity). But these transmissions do not reach the level of published theory, or declared truth-claim. They’re exploratory. Many errors must be presented in the process of singling out the least erroneous, for the one most truthful. This discretion cannot be granted to a party declaring a truth-claim. It must be warranted. (BAM!)

  • William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not mate

    William L. Benge

    Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not materialized into the commons. Personally held opinions which cannot be constructed into a viable argument or claim are either premature or presumption.

    We can take from this the true nature of the popular habit of airing one’s opinion to peers: infantilism by gossip.

    Now, OTOH, if a group of persons is exploring a matter then contributions are transmitted and received by the same discretion (reciprocity).

    But these transmissions do not reach the level of published theory, or declared truth-claim. They’re exploratory. Many errors must be presented in the process of singling out the least erroneous, for the one most truthful.

    This discretion cannot be granted to a party declaring a truth-claim.

    It must be warranted.

    (BAM!)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-14 12:18:00 UTC