Theme: Commons

  • 1. Because politicians demonstrate tragedy of the commons and monarchies preserv

    1. Because politicians demonstrate tragedy of the commons and monarchies preserve and increase common capital. (owners vs renters)
    2. Because political systems fail due to the iron law of oligarchy, the tendency to develop corruption, and the tendency of people to be self-victims of fashions of the age – so under rule of law of the natural law the monarchy serves as the judge of last resort, and the monarchy is above the law in the restoration of the rule of law of natural law.
    3. Look at countries with monarchies vs those without and the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of monarchies.

    (a) hans hoppe’s “Democracy the God that Failed”

    Reply addressees: @thedualMan


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 09:42:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657682675711320065

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657672789644681216

  • RT @WalterIII: MALE HIERARCHY ITSELF IS PART OF THE COMMONS The alpha male belie

    RT @WalterIII: MALE HIERARCHY ITSELF IS PART OF THE COMMONS
    The alpha male believes “commons production” is part of his personal responsib…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-13 22:40:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657516274455330817

  • I don’t say otherwise. I say that all people are capable of gradually evovlving

    I don’t say otherwise. I say that all people are capable of gradually evovlving rule of law and polities that produce comons desired or necessary for their development.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 21:14:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654595339750453251

    Reply addressees: @antigg860413

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654578776985022464

  • CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT Jewish vs Western thought manifests in th

    CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT
    Jewish vs Western thought manifests in the sciences as pragmatism vs truth. And Pragatism in ethics as selfishness vs contribution to commons.
    The pragmatism begins with the jewish seeking agreement regardless of truth (via positiva justification ignoring political consequences at scale) and westerners seeking truth in order to determine agreement (via negativa falsification b/c of political consequences of scale)
    This is why Cantor Bohr Einstein and Feynman relied on pictures not operations, verbalisms rather than operations, and pragmatism rather than truth – and killed progress in physics.
    And it’s why Marx, Boaz, Freud, destroyed behavioral science, the frankfurt school destroyed high culture, the postmodernists destroyed truth, Lysenko, Gould, destroyed evolution, and why Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin destroyed law. From this perspective, like the abrahamic religions, it’s the most destructive force in civilizational history.
    It’s also why jewish and western ethics are incompatible opposite.
    And it’s unfortunate that easy pragmatism is more attractive than difficult truth.
    Especially for women.
    So, oddly enough, it’s correct that the prewar criticism that jewish and western science differs was true.
    And it’s most visible in jewish behavioral sciences.
    And I discovered it in jewish vs western economics and law.
    So (a) Pragmatism (b) evasion of responsibility for the commons (c) mythicism (magical thinking) (d) conflating good/true bad/false, (e) face before truth (f) asymmetric returns as heroic (f) resulting in the female strategy. And that is the mirror image of western ethics that’s been brought to us by christianity, marxism, woke with women and immigrants resisting western truth before face, and maximization of responsibility for private and common(duty).

    (Note: The number of insights I gain by studying philosophers and detecting their lies, excuses, and errors is endless….)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 09:04:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652962155040260096

  • CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT Jewish vs Western thought manifests in th

    CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT
    Jewish vs Western thought manifests in the sciences as pragmatism vs truth. And Pragatism in ethics as selfishness vs contribution to commons.
    The pragmatism begins with the jewish seeking agreement regardless of truth (via positiva justification ignoring political consequences at scale) and westerners seeking truth in order to determine agreement (via negativa falsification b/c of political consequences of scale)
    This is why Cantor Bohr Einstein and Feynman relied on pictures not operations, verbalisms rather than operations, and pragmatism rather than truth – and killed progress in physics.
    And it’s why Marx, Boaz, Freud, destroyed behavioral science, the frankfurt school destroyed high culture, the postmodernists destroyed truth, Lysenko, Gould, destroyed evolution, and why Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin destroyed law. From this perspective, like the abrahamic religions, it’s the most destructive force in civilizational history.
    It’s also why jewish and western ethics are incompatible opposite.
    And it’s unfortunate that easy pragmatism is more attractive than difficult truth.
    Especially for women.
    So, oddly enough, it’s correct that the prewar criticism that jewish and western science differs was true.
    And it’s most visible in jewish behavioral sciences.
    And I discovered it in jewish vs western economics and law.
    So (a) Pragmatism (b) evasion of responsibility for the commons (c) mythicism (magical thinking) (d) conflating good/true bad/false, (e) face before truth (f) asymmetric returns as heroic (f) resulting in the female strategy. And that is the mirror image of western ethics that’s been brought to us by christianity, marxism, woke with women and immigrants resisting western truth before face, and maximization of responsibility for private and common(duty).

    (Note: The number of insights I gain by studying philosophers and detecting their lies, excuses, and errors is endless….)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 09:04:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652962154872545281

  • Reason: “Whiteness” consists of the maximization of individual responsibility fo

    Reason: “Whiteness” consists of the maximization of individual responsibility for self, the private, and the common. Density deprives one of the possibility of responsibility and generates demand for authority. Authority deprives one of truth before face. Truth is determined by testifiability. Science and logic produce testifiability. That’s the reason for the war on science. Non-whites appear to have significant problems with both truth before face and maximum responsibility for self and commons. That’s the purpose of the Marxist-to-Woke/DEI movement: to end Western demand for “Whiteness” (truth before face and maximum responsibility for self, private and common.) So are whites somehow biologically and genetically superior, or are whites just more willing to pay the high psychological, emotional, and social costs of ‘Whiteness’?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 03:22:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652513838586052610

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652472260236656642

  • Reason: “Whiteness” consists of the maximization of individual responsibility fo

    Reason: “Whiteness” consists of the maximization of individual responsibility for self, the private, and the common. Density deprives one of the possibility of responsibility and generates demand for authority. Authority deprives one of truth before face. Truth is determined by testifiability. Science and logic produce testifiability. That’s the reason for the war on science. Non-whites appear to have significant problems with both truth before face and maximum responsibility for self and commons. That’s the purpose of the Marxist-to-Woke/DEI movement: to end Western demand for “Whiteness” (truth before face and maximum responsibility for self, private and common.) So are whites somehow biologically and genetically superior, or are whites just more willing to pay the high psychological, emotional, and social costs of ‘Whiteness’?

    Reply addressees: @ajrwalker @Drew09490585


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 03:22:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652513838502166528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652472260236656642

  • THE DEMAND FOR SEPARATION (the restoration of the federation by the devolution o

    THE DEMAND FOR SEPARATION
    (the restoration of the federation by the devolution of powers to the states, regions, counties, and cities, so that we may create the different commons we unequally desire, and for which we are unequally fit, so that we may cooperate strategically as… https://t.co/c6Q86DY1qR


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-22 14:37:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649784553127419905

  • Because it does work *IF* the voters share a common interest in taking individua

    Because it does work *IF* the voters share a common interest in taking individual responsibility for the self, others, the commons and institutions including institutions of cultural production, AND are limited by the rule of law by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 20:20:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648421313726537729

    Reply addressees: @TomKawczynski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648419977991688193

  • Quite the opposite. SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING R

    Quite the opposite.

    SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMONS WHILE HIDING BEHIND MORAL PRETENSE

    CAUSE: Evasion of responsibility for the common but demand for control of the commons, externalizing consequential responsibility to males.

    Industrialize the sale and distribution of false promises by the tactics of by means of:

    Denial
    1. Dismissal of the Evidence, History, Argument, Incentives, Norm, or Tradition
    2. Evading providing a competitive, equally criticizable and testable alternative.
    3. Equating Desirability-Undesirability and Approval-Disapproval or Denial with Truth and Falsehood
    4. Face-Before-Truth rather than European truth-before-face, or threat to the dominance or competence hierarchy.
    4. NAXALT – “Not All X Are Like  That” – Denying a general rule describing a distribution is false because there are some cases at the tails.

    Undermining by Ad Hominem (GSRRM)
    Consisting of:
    1. Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
    2. GSRRM:
    … denial
    … disapproval,
    … outraging
    … ridicule,
    … shaming,
    … moralizing,
    … psychologizing,
    … rallying,
    … gossiping,
    … reputation destruction
    … and Social Construction

    Creating Plausible Deniability
    1. Hiding Behind Moral Pretense
    2. Hiding behind Voluntary Choice
    3. Hiding behind Sympathy for Hyper consumption (experiences)
    4. Hiding Behind (Selective) Evasion of Responsibility
    5. Heaping Undue Criticism (Persecution) and Undue Praise (personalizing)

    Fraud by: Claiming Oppression by individuals as a proxy for laws of nature, or conversely claiming false promise of possibility of evading the laws of nature:
    1. False Promise of Freedom from Formal Laws (logic, truth) by the use of social construction of repetitive feedback of information counter to formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
    2. False Promise of Freedom from Physical Laws (scarcity, false promise of endless growth). by the false promise of endless growth, an end to scarcity, and an end to human competition by demonstrated acquisition.
    3. False Promise of Freedom Natural Laws (of self-interest, rational choice, amorality, reciprocity, competitive organization), by the false promise of an end to kin selection, koinophillia, ethnocentrism, sex, class, subrace, and racial differences, and the sexual, social, economic, and political value of organization by ethnocentrism given the class, subrace, and subrace differences in sexual, social, economic, and political value to one another, given the substantial evolutionary difference between the races and subraces.
    4. False Promise of Freedom from Evolutionary Laws ( ending natural, and market selection, accumulating mutation and regulation, the impossibility of isolation, inescapable regression, accumulated genetic load, dysgenia, and the red queen of resources, competitors, biological, climatological, geological, solar, and galactic risks. ).

    Using “Storytelling” by:
    1. Faith Healing, delaying into hazard. Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.
    2. False Story Telling, baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.
    3. False Promise, baiting into hazard. Baiting into hazard consists of making false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe. arguing them with sophistry to idealism, magic to pseudoscience, or occult to theology.
    4. False Criticism, undermining into hazard.
    5. Duplicitous, Double Standard, Irreciprocal, and Poly Logical Ethics, like their polylogical unequal laws,

    Escalating from the least burdensome to the most burdensome tactic:
    1. Faith healing at every opportunity (lie and deny)
    2. Selling false promise if they can (fraud)
    3. Evading or silencing at every necessity (shaming, moralizing, psychologizing)
    4. Undermining if they have opportunity to (sedition)
    5. Attack if they can get away with it (de-platforming, conspiracy)
    6. Hiding behind plausible deniability of freedom of choice (non-coercion)
    he opposite.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 20:13:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648057143784886280

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648045661147877415