Theme: Coercion

  • RT @StevePender: Self defense is perhaps the most basic example of constructing

    RT @StevePender: Self defense is perhaps the most basic example of constructing a right (bodily health) by prohibiting (enforcing prosecuti…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 17:38:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633522537828081664

  • Give it up liz. If trump wanted a revolt he knew how to ask for it. If we wanted

    Give it up liz.
    If trump wanted a revolt he knew how to ask for it.
    If we wanted to create a revolt we would have.
    The people who were there were no worse than and largely better than any given Antifa rally.
    Look how peaceful they are when they get inside.
    Republicans.
    The good…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 23:41:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633251673295470594

    Reply addressees: @Liz_Cheney

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633157808051875865

  • As I’ve said, “If it was an insurrection there wouldn’t be any doubt, because ev

    As I’ve said, “If it was an insurrection there wouldn’t be any doubt, because everything would have been on fire, lots of people would be dead, demands would have been made, and politicians would be hung from every horizontal beam in walking distance.”

    I didn’t go because I knew what would happen given who was organizing it.
    But I had a speech ready to make from the House floor if I’d made it there.
    And it stated demands, and those demands would have been moral, and constitutional, and then it would have been a revolution – to restore the constitution, and our republic and our rule of law, and our concurrent and common, natural law.

    Now, we will see whether another opportunity arises, or we have a civil war, or fall as did Rome.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 17:54:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633164175563268096

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633160755980693506

  • As I’ve said, “If it was an insurrection there wouldn’t be any doubt, because ev

    As I’ve said, “If it was an insurrection there wouldn’t be any doubt, because everything would have been on fire, lots of people would be dead, demands would have been made, and politicians would be hung from every horizontal beam in walking distance.”

    I didn’t go because I knew what would happen given who was organizing it.
    But I had a speech ready to make from the House floor if I’d made it there.
    And it stated demands, and those demands would have been moral, and constitutional, and then it would have been a revolution – to restore the constitution, and our republic and our rule of law, and our concurrent and common, natural law.

    Now, we will see whether another opportunity arises, or we have a civil war, or fall as did Rome.

    Reply addressees: @christophaa


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 17:54:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633164175399612422

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633160755980693506

  • RT @JackPosobiec: TUCKER: The SPLC is a domestic terrorist group

    RT @JackPosobiec: TUCKER: The SPLC is a domestic terrorist group https://t.co/9BPBa9sXjQ


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 05:00:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632969382719569920

  • “Forgiveness is between them and god. It’s [our] job to arrange a meeting”– A J

    –“Forgiveness is between them and god. It’s [our] job to arrange a meeting”– A J Quinell

    Up there with that one’s up there with “… and let the gods sort them out”.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 03:07:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632941105498005505

  • LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE: (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, sta

    LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE:
    (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, states that your intention doesn’t matter. In a crime (a severe tort or trespass) your intention may matter or not.
    but;
    (b) The question is what shall we prohibit trespass against? What is the scope of our demonstrated interests?
    and;
    (c) Westerners alone, developed military reporting, testimonial (empirical) truth, and truth-before-face, in confession, commons, and court. Truth before face regardless of cost to self image, reputation, the competence or dominance hierarchy, is a DUTY. That duty is the reason the west developed jury, democracy (jury), thang and sentate debate (jury), and the reason, empiricism, and science, that almost alone dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, and poverty.
    And;
    (d) Truth before face is horoic, a contribution to the commons (a tax, sacrifice), and a status symbol for men, who demonstrate they are willing to risk conflict for the common good. But it is an risk for women and effeminate men, because they seek to avoid conflict at a cost to the common good. Ergo men ‘adult’ the sexes, ad women “infantilize” the sexes, in any and all matters of the commons. The cognitive difference between men and women is male systematizing over time seeking responsibiity and capital even by risk for status, vs female empathizing in time seeking evasion of responsibilty and capital accumulation in favor of huperconsumption at low risk. Hence female irresponsibility for the commons, hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
    But;
    (e) The introduction of women into the voting pool without either training women to avoid their evasion of responsibility for the commons, or placing a requrement for demonstrated competency in matters of the commons, opened teh door for postwar ‘feminization and infantilization’ of the institutional, political, economic, educational, social, familial, informational, and familial commons. Thereby destroying truth before face, realism, naturalism, empiricism, testimony, law, social norms and traditions, and the family as the first system of intergenerational production. And it’s unconsious, involuntary, instinct. And it resulted in the same as it has in every other past condition including the feminization of the french court, the christian destruction of the classical world, and the fall of spartans and their civilization.
    Therefore;
    (f) We must fight in war, we must forgoe crime, we must pay taxes, we must adhere to the natural law (law proper), and we must speak the truth before face regardless of cost, or we cannot have rule of law, jury, democracy, the high trust society, the economic, innovative, adaptive, evolutionary gains of the west that evolved faster than the rest whenever possible in the bronze (indo european), iron (mediterranean) and steel (atlantic) ages. And with that evolution we ended 2000 years of stagnation, poverty, disease and suffering, and dragged mankind kicking and screaming of ignorance, superstition poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death.
    Therefore;
    (g) the biological differences between classes, ethnicities, civilizations, and races is as significant as the difference betwen the sexes. And for the same reasons: i) the degree of neotenic evolution of the race ii) the degree of genetic load in the classes iii) the asymmetry of classes between races and ethnicities iv) and the necessity of and the tendency for sexes, classes, ethnicities, civiliizations, and races to rely on kin preference and kin selection simply because they have more INTERESTS IN COMMON than those otherwise. As such given that the most scarce resource is cooperation, and that indifference between individuals and groups is a NECESSARY behavioral economy that cannot be evaded.
    (h) So this creates a conflict between the needs of our cooperation in particular commons, and the needs of our cooperation by general trade.
    ie: Separation is the only possible solution.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 16:48:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632785273389035526

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632747665321791488

  • LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE: (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, sta

    LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE:
    (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, states that your intention doesn’t matter. In a crime (a severe tort or trespass) your intention may matter or not.
    but;
    (b) The question is what shall we prohibit trespass against? What is the scope of our demonstrated interests?
    and;
    (c) Westerners alone, developed military reporting, testimonial (empirical) truth, and truth-before-face, in confession, commons, and court. Truth before face regardless of cost to self image, reputation, the competence or dominance hierarchy, is a DUTY. That duty is the reason the west developed jury, democracy (jury), thang and sentate debate (jury), and the reason, empiricism, and science, that almost alone dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, and poverty.
    And;
    (d) Truth before face is horoic, a contribution to the commons (a tax, sacrifice), and a status symbol for men, who demonstrate they are willing to risk conflict for the common good. But it is an risk for women and effeminate men, because they seek to avoid conflict at a cost to the common good. Ergo men ‘adult’ the sexes, ad women “infantilize” the sexes, in any and all matters of the commons. The cognitive difference between men and women is male systematizing over time seeking responsibiity and capital even by risk for status, vs female empathizing in time seeking evasion of responsibilty and capital accumulation in favor of huperconsumption at low risk. Hence female irresponsibility for the commons, hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
    But;
    (e) The introduction of women into the voting pool without either training women to avoid their evasion of responsibility for the commons, or placing a requrement for demonstrated competency in matters of the commons, opened teh door for postwar ‘feminization and infantilization’ of the institutional, political, economic, educational, social, familial, informational, and familial commons. Thereby destroying truth before face, realism, naturalism, empiricism, testimony, law, social norms and traditions, and the family as the first system of intergenerational production. And it’s unconsious, involuntary, instinct. And it resulted in the same as it has in every other past condition including the feminization of the french court, the christian destruction of the classical world, and the fall of spartans and their civilization.
    Therefore;
    (f) We must fight in war, we must forgoe crime, we must pay taxes, we must adhere to the natural law (law proper), and we must speak the truth before face regardless of cost, or we cannot have rule of law, jury, democracy, the high trust society, the economic, innovative, adaptive, evolutionary gains of the west that evolved faster than the rest whenever possible in the bronze (indo european), iron (mediterranean) and steel (atlantic) ages. And with that evolution we ended 2000 years of stagnation, poverty, disease and suffering, and dragged mankind kicking and screaming of ignorance, superstition poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death.
    Therefore;
    (g) the biological differences between classes, ethnicities, civilizations, and races is as significant as the difference betwen the sexes. And for the same reasons: i) the degree of neotenic evolution of the race ii) the degree of genetic load in the classes iii) the asymmetry of classes between races and ethnicities iv) and the necessity of and the tendency for sexes, classes, ethnicities, civiliizations, and races to rely on kin preference and kin selection simply because they have more INTERESTS IN COMMON than those otherwise. As such given that the most scarce resource is cooperation, and that indifference between individuals and groups is a NECESSARY behavioral economy that cannot be evaded.
    (h) So this creates a conflict between the needs of our cooperation in particular commons, and the needs of our cooperation by general trade.
    ie: Separation is the only possible solution.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 16:48:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632785273774915585

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632747665321791488

  • RT @curtdoolittle: REVIEW: PATH DEPENDENCE IN CIVILIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1. Only

    RT @curtdoolittle: REVIEW: PATH DEPENDENCE IN CIVILIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
    1. Only three methods of influence->coercion exist.
    2. All civili…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 14:29:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632750160752132096

  • ATLAS OF IMPUNITY Impunity is the exercise of power without accountability, whic

    ATLAS OF IMPUNITY
    Impunity is the exercise of power without accountability, which becomes, in its starkest form, the commission of crimes without punishment. The Atlas of Impunity is a comprehensive tool designed to track the abuse of power across five key https://www.kofiannanfoundation.org/articles/atlas-of-impunity/… https://t.co/YyRfyQn3Pf


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 21:19:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632491162790514690