Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • FORCIBLE REDISTRIBUTION IS MISSED OPPORTUNITY FOR EXCHANGE Forcible redistributi

    FORCIBLE REDISTRIBUTION IS MISSED OPPORTUNITY FOR EXCHANGE

    Forcible redistribution via taxation deprives us of the ability to ask for something in exchange for our earnings.

    What we would most often like in exchange are conformity to norms (predictability of signals), and social status (reward).

    If redistribution is politically necessary to prevent friction in politics, but undesired by the population, then the government needs to be broken up.

    The reason being that governments that act on the behalf of constituencies can negotiate trade policy to effectively form redistribution from those who DESIRE to trade with others, versus those that do not.

    Conformity is how we prefer to determine whether someone has access to our market. However, if they do not conform, that does not mean that they cannot extract from us something that we wish to give them in exchange for granting us access to THEIR market.

    It isnt necessarily mandatory that governments possess a monopoly over territory. Collective trade bargaining can be conducted by currency differences. But only if currency is entirely digital – so that we can make use of many of them.

    Technology makes interesting political options available to us today,t he same way that the invention of money made new political options available in the past.

    It’s fascinating.

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-19 16:49:00 UTC

  • OUR WEALTH OF VIOLENCE Under anarchy, we agree NOT to use our natural capacity f

    OUR WEALTH OF VIOLENCE

    Under anarchy, we agree NOT to use our natural capacity for violence, theft and fraud, and by each of us agreeing to not use violence theft and fraud, we obtain property rights. Property rights are the RESULT of forgoing violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, obstruction, externalization and shaming and rallying. When we forgo all of these forms of involuntary transfer, nothing is let to us but that narrow means of cooperation we call honest, fully informed, voluntary exchange.

    By many of us agreeing not to use our natural capacity for violence, theft fraud, fraud by omission, obstruction, externalization, shaming, rallying, and organized extortion, and instead forcing ourselves to cooperate voluntarily, by honest, fully informed, voluntary exchange, we create a market.

    Governments are monopolistic insurers, usually formed by nobility, and oligarchy, or a conquerer.

    Under a monopoly government, we pay our wealth of violence to the state, as the first, and ultimate tax. And in return, we expect defense, arbitration of differences.

    We also agree to paying for the necessity of supporting defenders (warriors and soldiers), administrators (sheriffs), and arbitrators (judges), in exchange. It is a convenient division of labor to hire specialists. Warriors, sheriffs and judges are necessary arbiters of war, violence, theft and fraud.

    Although, in English history, the militia is the check and balance on the insurers, rather than competing insurers. In fact, the militia, of armed men, is the only check on monopoly government.

    Violence is the answer, and the only answer.

    We were born with a wealth of violence. We let the state borrow our violence on our behalf, as a division of labor, so that we may specialize in what we wish to. But if the state does not justly use our violence, it is our obligation and our moral right, and our personal necessity, to withdraw our wealth of violence from the state, and to use that wealth to enact a new order.

    I am tired of poor people being dragged into court, fined and losing work for no other reason than choosing to eat or sleep or work, rather than pay taxes, fines, and fees. I am tired of families struggling or the elderly struggling, so that the impulsive and unconstrained bearers of children can obtain succor at their expense.

    I am tired of white males being prosecuted for trying to take great risks to create wealth and protect it so that they no longer must take great risks.

    Withdraw your wealth of violence. Cease paying your tax of violence. Become a protestor of the violence tax, and return your violence to your own control, and use. Take back your first and greatest wealth.

    VIOLENCE IS OUR FIRST NATURAL RIGHT.

    USE IT.

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-17 14:07:00 UTC

  • ON FEMINIST (female), POSTMODERN(male), SOCIALIST PHILOSOPHY Creating a polity b

    ON FEMINIST (female), POSTMODERN(male), SOCIALIST PHILOSOPHY

    Creating a polity by words for the purpose of rent-seeking and free riding.

    Feminist Philosophy questions the foundations of ETHICS, not LOGIC. And that Feminist Rhetoric, with whom Postmodern, Totalitarian, and Socialist authors share identical tactics:

    1) the purpose of their language:is not to construct categories which can be measured, but to conflate categories so that they cannot be measured. This is perhaps the most important insight that we can use to deflate totalitarian claims. The attempt to claim a group where there is diversity, in an attempt to seek rents and free ride.

    2) is to create ‘unity’ or ‘group’ out of involuntary participants in that group, by loading, overloading, framing, shaming, and obscuring the differences between individuals. The purpose of this unity is so that feminists can seek extractive policies by the state, against individuals outside their group. In other words so that women can seek free riding and rents on males.

    3) While it is true that in the workplace, in the aggregate, men and women are equally productive, the statement is an artifact of above-said logic of aggregation: the fact is, that 1% of people, produce almost all the material value in a society, 10% apply those insights, and another 10% communicate them effectively to all others. This is why the Pareto Rule applies to all human behavior: 20% of people own and do everything. The rest are engaged in production and consumption. And they must be. Because they can’d do anything else. And the data is the data, the upper ten percent is dominated by males, because males dominate the upper regions of intelligence by no less than four to one. Female solipsistic reasoning is solipsistic and nothing more.

    4) THE PURPOSE OF FEMINIST LOGIC IS TO LIE. While I tend to keep track of feminist writing, because much of it is interesting, the fact is that women are biased much more solipsistic, just as men are biased much more autistic. And the division of knowledge and labor is painful for many women who feel isolated and unable to function in the division of knowledge and labor. Philosophy in the pursuit of truth is one thing. It is a precursor to measurement, and therefore the precursor to science. Philosophy in the pursuit of feeling better about the world we live in is something else: religion. I don’t criticize religion, simply because we ARE unequal, and I don’t feel it is my right to deny people solace. However, religion is not science, it does not correspond to reality, and we must, in science, commerce, and politics, correspond to the constraints that reality places upon us.

    I wish I was six inches taller. I’m not. I can’t play basketball. I wish a lot of the time, my Aspiness wasn’t such a burden for me to constantly carry. I wish I hadn’t been born into a family with so many internal problems. I wish I hadn’t lost my first three fortunes, and each time had to make a new one.

    Fantasies are fantasies. And fantasies have no place in economics and politics. We all live better lives because of science, economics and those aspects of politics that are scientific: the common law. Religions are not scientific.

    Feminist philosophy as put forth in this article is just another secular religion of totalitarianism like postmodern and socialist influences that it draws from.

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-15 07:43:00 UTC

  • THE STATE CAUSES INSIDER TRADING “In an economy like ours, with a central bank t

    THE STATE CAUSES INSIDER TRADING

    “In an economy like ours, with a central bank that can instigate disruptions at will, the only people who can make money on a consistent basis through investment are insiders. The people who get prosecuted for insider trading are being punished not really for insider trading but for being renegades, i.e., for exploiting insider trading without first getting the tacit permission of the state.”

    — Kenneth Allen Hopf

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-12 10:41:00 UTC

  • THREE WEAPONS OF INFLUENCE 1. OSTRACIZE(SHAME), 2. BUY(COMPENSATE), 3.FORCE(THRE

    THREE WEAPONS OF INFLUENCE

    1. OSTRACIZE(SHAME), 2. BUY(COMPENSATE), 3.FORCE(THREATEN)

    We have spent a century shaming them.

    We have spent three quarters of a century trying to buy them.

    And neither has worked. They redefined morality with Postmodernism. And our efforts to buy them off only encouraged them.

    The only remaining choice is to threaten them. To harm them. To kill them if necessary.

    Violence is the source, and sustenance, of private property rights.

    Use it or lose them.

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-10 07:32:00 UTC

  • MINIMUM WAGE LAWS ARE EUGENIC I just became a fan of high minimum wages. Immigra

    MINIMUM WAGE LAWS ARE EUGENIC

    I just became a fan of high minimum wages. Immigration isn’t really very useful if low wage jobs are forced into the black market, and unskilled labor can’t find ANY work.

    🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-10 04:49:00 UTC

  • BUDGET OFFICE: Top……40% Paid 106.2% of Income Taxes; Bottom 40% Paid -9.1%..

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/cbotop-40-paid-1062-income-taxes-bottom-40-paid-91-got-average-18950CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE:

    Top……40% Paid 106.2% of Income Taxes;

    Bottom 40% Paid -9.1%…

    AND……Got an average of $18,950 in ‘Transfers’

    Of course, my preference is that we just GAVE THEM CASH rather than ‘transfers’. And it’s their preference too I assume.

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-09 17:59:00 UTC

  • GAME : WOMAN BEATS THE DAYLIGHTS OUT OF HER ATTACKER. This joker takes a swing a

    http://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/knockout-game-goes-terribly-right-woman-wails-her-attackerKNOCKOUT GAME : WOMAN BEATS THE DAYLIGHTS OUT OF HER ATTACKER.

    This joker takes a swing at this woman and she pounds him into the floor.

    This guy, he has no chance of respect ever, as long as there is digital media.

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-09 16:54:00 UTC

  • UPDATE : SILENCING THE MEDIA PRIOR TO VIOLENCE “Web-sites of many of opposite pa

    http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-euromaidan-russian-media/25194912.htmlKYIV UPDATE : SILENCING THE MEDIA PRIOR TO VIOLENCE

    “Web-sites of many of opposite parties and mass media are under ddos-attack.” (Thats Russian work)

    “Ukrainian opposition sites attacked from Russian IP addresses, reports Hromadske TV”

    “@HromadskeTV @5channel @radiosvoboda others under DDos attacks. make sure use services like http://cloudflare.com”

    “sorry guys, i have to go offline. can’t say more. hope 2 get back soon. Follow @MaxRTucker, @ChristopherJM, @ngumenyuk”

    “Police rushes in and occupies offices of the TV channels that were the only to show the REAL situation.

    RUSSIAN MEDIA IN ‘COMBAT MODE’

    http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-euromaidan-russian-media/25194912.html

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-09 12:09:00 UTC

  • THE MORALITY OF VIOLENCE. (important) If force is required to construct liberty

    THE MORALITY OF VIOLENCE.

    (important)

    If force is required to construct liberty and therefore property against the will of those who desire communality. If force is required to forbid inbreeding and force outbreeding. If Chivalry was intentionally created as a status system to provide heroism through services as an alternative to combat.

    Then how can liberty be pacific? How can we claim it is a natural moral system?

    We can’t.

    Force can be morally used in any circumstance to forbid all involuntary transfers, and to force all people to participate in the market for goods and services.

    Conversely, those who oppose liberty wish to retain their ability to seek rents and free ride. This is the only reason to oppose it. As such, they do not wish others to have private property rights, and therefore can have none of their own. (Although tis is black or whit argument, and it is possible to say, that they will refrain from fraud, theft, and violence, in exchange for rents and free riding, but they will not forgo rents and free riding in exchange for property rights.

    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-09 09:19:00 UTC