Theme: Coercion

  • Never walk away from an argument, a fight or a war. It’s the highest tax we pay.

    Never walk away from an argument, a fight or a war. It’s the highest tax we pay. But it’s the most important one. #NRx #tcot #tlot


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-05 14:35:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628937350878355457

  • YES THE USA EXPORTS COSTS (TAXES) TO THE REST OF THE WORLD. BUT ARE YOU REALLY S

    YES THE USA EXPORTS COSTS (TAXES) TO THE REST OF THE WORLD. BUT ARE YOU REALLY SURE YOU DON”T WANT TO PAY THEM?

    QUESTION:

    —“How much of a connection, ultimately, is there between American military might and the global reserve status of the US Dollar? With global reserve status, the Federal Reserve (the Fed) has license to print currency almost indiscriminately, because that liquidity injection can be off-shored (often into sovereign wealth funds, that are used in oil trade). “—Davin.

    ANSWER:

    Yes, this is how America taxes the world for policing of the air, sea, land, trade and financing system.

    (The use of the euro for oil purchases is another means of tax evasion so that europeans do not have to pay for nato defense. A fact that is not lost on Americans.)

    But without this method of taxing the rest of the world, we would have to export the cost of military defense to the rest of the world, which is terribly expensive, inefficient and provides opportunity and stimulus for warfare.

    Military overhead is high. Military duplication is terribly expensive. Individual states paying for their own militaries is actually comparatively impossible.

    I have been advocating the export of military and military costs to the rest of the world, **OR** the transfer of the US government to NATO, and the fragmentation of the USA into separate nations for the better part of two decades for this reason.

    So while I agree with your description of the seemingly unjust mechanics of exporting inflation I disagree with the presumption that the USA is imposing costs. It is instead, providing the most expensive service a nation can undertake at a fraction of the necessary equivalent. A tremendous discount, without which the liberal order of the west is not possible.

    So I am perfectly happy to unwind the Nixon-era world-defense-tax, but the anglo-germanic-catholic western world should be very well aware that by doing so, they will sacrifice the vast discount and be forced for some period, to spend upwards of 10% of gdp to construct a military equivalent of the American forces.

    For all intents and purposes nato is a lie. America pays for the defense of the western world after the fall of the British empire that did the same.

    We paid for it by means of asymmetric production ability through about 1970. After 1970 we paid for it by indirect taxes on oil. Going forward, we will not be able to pay for it.

    This is why the next world war will occur, as the western world attempts to preserve unearned privileges of redistribution and social programs, while US power diminishes, and competitors with less liberal (less libertarian, less meritocratic, less individualist and less global) incentives (competitive needs) seek to capture control of trade, finance, political, and rent opportunities.

    And once that set of events becomes visible (which it will with the ascent of iran and russia if not china) then the arms race will accelerate as smaller weaker governments seek to preserve sovereignty in the face of expansionary state capitalism, and expansionary islam.

    So my advice is just the opposite. Make sure either the USA gets its taxes, or make sure that each western country goes through a radical reallocation of resources to economic, territorial and political defense.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-05 08:32:00 UTC

  • Hitler was a leftist. He just used the military on his own people like all lefti

    Hitler was a leftist. He just used the military on his own people like all leftists do.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-04 16:18:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628600960970043392

    Reply addressees: @Lexi__Alexandra

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628582859738087424


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628582859738087424

  • #SignsYoureRightWing: “You think socialism, communism and fascism are synonyms.”

    #SignsYoureRightWing: “You think socialism, communism and fascism are synonyms.”, Because they’re synonyms for ‘theft’ not one another.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-04 07:07:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628462178711040000

  • GENETIC PACIFICATION: THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION I think that anyone with knowle

    GENETIC PACIFICATION: THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION

    I think that anyone with knowledge of the intellectual history of law is keenly aware of the church’s problem of breaking up the large family holdings, and the law’s problem of preventing retaliation. What I think has proven difficult for most people in the conservative and certainly in the libertarian movements, is the recognition that property rights must extend to cover all those impositions that invoke retaliation. While we consider the central problem the state, the state is the result of suppressing private impositions while preserving political rents. But the central problem we face if we wish to reduce or elminate the interference and rent seeking of the state, is to eliminate by way of the common law, by positive assertion of property rights, all actions that produce retaliation, whether in public or private life.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-04 04:34:00 UTC

  • YES, YOU CAN USE VIOLENCE TO CREATE PEACE. —“You can’t bomb people into peace”

    YES, YOU CAN USE VIOLENCE TO CREATE PEACE.

    —“You can’t bomb people into peace”—

    Arguably false. The great ‘peaces’ have all been the result of those empires possessing and exercising disproportionate power over trade routes, and in doing so creating single commercial zones, so that all competition is forced into the market for goods and services, and all political and military competition is suppressed. So the evidence is quite the contrary: you absolutely can bomb into peace. No question about it. In fact, bombing into peace is the standard by which such things are accomplished. The question is not the bombs, but whether one chooses to rule or exploit those one has bombed. If one chooses to rule, and rules by rule of law, then who GOVERNS is something quite different. Most polities will tolerate rule if they can continue governance (discretionary production of commons). It is not the provision of commons (government) that challenges less advanced people, but the adjudication of differences by objective means.

    Aristocracy’s function is to rule, not necessarily to govern. We prohibit violence and theft, prohibit error, bias, wishful thinking and deceit., and adjudicate differences. We do not favor much else other than beauty. Aristocracy uses limits. Hypotheses we leave to others.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-04 02:28:00 UTC

  • Don’t lie: You’re not showing tolerance. You’re failing to pay the high cost of

    Don’t lie: You’re not showing tolerance. You’re failing to pay the high cost of defense. It is what it is. Liar. #tcot #tlot #NRx #altright


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 12:30:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627818826319679488

  • The Art of Predation: Murder, Violence, Theft, Fraud, Extortion, Externalization

    The Art of Predation: Murder, Violence, Theft, Fraud, Extortion, Externalization, Free-Riding, Conspiracy, Displacement, and Conquest. #tlot


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 10:31:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627788886601801728

  • JOHANNES IS RIGHT: RELOCATE ALL THE “IMMIGRANTS” TO AFGHANISTAN. I mean, we used

    JOHANNES IS RIGHT: RELOCATE ALL THE “IMMIGRANTS” TO AFGHANISTAN.

    I mean, we used Australia as a prison colony. Why not Afghanistan? It’s a wasteland. Ship them all there. Drop them off, and let them work their way home.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-31 09:38:00 UTC

  • Liberty Must Be Imposed by Force

    LIBERTY (FREEDOM FROM PARASITISM) MUST BE IMPOSED BY FORCE, BUT LIBERTY NEED NOT BE UNIVERSALLY REQUIRED: A MONOPOLY IS NOT NECESSARY. [L]iberty is the desire of those who are able.  Security the desire of those who are not. And parasitism is the desire of those who are evil. While strict construction of agreements, and the decidability of conflicts are impossible without a monopoly of individual property rights to property-en-toto, there is no reason for a monopoly means of producing commons using those rights.

    There is no reason some individuals cannot form collectives and ostracize libertarians and no reason libertarians cannot form collective and ostracize communalists. There is no reason some cannot participate in socialist groups and others libertarian groups – as long as rule of law under property-en-toto, and the total prohibition on parasitism exists as a means of providing for strict construction of agreements, and decidability in conflicts. We know what bad is: parasitism. But good is dependent upon your abilities. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)