Theme: Coercion

If that’s true shanon then why is canceling people for their political biases not illegal. Especially given that the research is pretty clear that political biases are as are all other traits, more than half genetic in origin. And worse, that the differences in those biases is feminine short term empathizing to avoid self regulation and search for status by hyperconsumption while evading responsibility for defense of the private and common versus masculine long term systematizing demanding self regulation and search for status by capitalization by pursuing responsibility for private and common.

The question is why would you teach progressive ‘values’ when they are universally reducible to the reduction of responsibility and the production of dependency and incompetence, resulting in conflict between the productive and none, and the feminine consumptive and male capitalizing, and a credentialed elite lacking demonstrated competency in any means of production that is subject to adversarial competition and therefore falsification?

You may not be intelligent enough of educated enough to understand this, nor grasp history enough to understand it, but there is a reason there are and never will be feminine equalitarian empathic hyperconsuming irresponsibility seeking governments or civilizations. Because it’s an evolutionary impossibility despite that it’s the false promise of progressivism.

Reply addressees: @EvilShanon @ACLU

If that’s true shanon then why is canceling people for their political biases not illegal. Especially given that the research is pretty clear that political biases are as are all other traits, more than half genetic in origin. And worse, that the differences in those biases is feminine short term empathizing to avoid self regulation and search for status by hyperconsumption while evading responsibility for defense of the private and common versus masculine long term systematizing demanding self regulation and search for status by capitalization by pursuing responsibility for private and common.

The question is why would you teach progressive ‘values’ when they are universally reducible to the reduction of responsibility and the production of dependency and incompetence, resulting in conflict between the productive and none, and the feminine consumptive and male capitalizing, and a credentialed elite lacking demonstrated competency in any means of production that is subject to adversarial competition and therefore falsification?

You may not be intelligent enough of educated enough to understand this, nor grasp history enough to understand it, but there is a reason there are and never will be feminine equalitarian empathic hyperconsuming irresponsibility seeking governments or civilizations. Because it’s an evolutionary impossibility despite that it’s the false promise of progressivism.