Theme: Coercion

  • If one life can be saved, then guns should be outlawed… then, if one life can

    If one life can be saved, then guns should be outlawed…

    then, if one life can be saved, why can’t islam be outlawed?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-09 17:28:00 UTC

  • Anglos : Argumentatively Fiddling While Lady Europa Burns. There is no moral con

    Anglos : Argumentatively Fiddling While Lady Europa Burns.

    There is no moral conflict here.

    Kill them all, until they stop coming.

    And the ones who are already here leave.

    Salt the the immoral earth.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-09 06:31:00 UTC

  • Oppressed Victims vs Conquered Barbarians? Man was never oppressed. He was domes

    Oppressed Victims vs Conquered Barbarians?

    Man was never oppressed. He was domesticated. By conquest. By extermination. By eugenic reproduction. Including aggressive culling of the herd.

    Oppression is bull____t created by ____ to protect their shi___y offspring from culling, the underclasses begging for unearned bread and circuses, and the priests and public intellectuals for food, drink and rents.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-08 13:12:00 UTC

  • EMINENT DOMAIN At what point are you forcing unnecessary expenses upon neighborh

    EMINENT DOMAIN

    At what point are you forcing unnecessary expenses upon neighborhoods (sewer upgrades, road upgrades)?

    At what point does your satisfaction impose so severely upon the satisfaction of others that you are causing others lost opportunity?

    The problem with eminent domain is ‘market price’, rather than developed price. In other words, why do not landholders get shares in future revenues? Or at least three times the market value of the property.

    Conversely, why should a slumlord get anything a all?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-07 09:28:00 UTC

  • What is the Source of Political Power? Organizing Using Three Tools of Coercion.

    –“Curt: Political power ultimately originates from Economics or exchange, right?”—

    [I] am not sure I understand this question. There are three methods of power: 1) force, 2) payment, 3) gossip. One can use those three methods exclusively or in combination to band together into groups or hierarchies, and the focus the group’s efforts on the application of force, payment, or gossip (rallying/shaming/including/ostracizing). Political power – meaning anything ranging from monopoly producer of commons to a distributed production of commons – can be constructed from any one or combination of, those methods of coercion. Political power originates in the ability of humans to organize and coerce. It just so happens that we use gossip to rally and shame and ostracize people from production and opportunity for consumption. But then we scale. It just so happens that you need to use violence to suppress parasitism sufficiently for a market to form, at that scale. But then we scale further. And then to use law to suppress cheating, fraud, and to impose performance, and restitution, and if necessary, punishment. But then we scale further. And then we use wealth created by the application of violence and law and to force market participation rather than parasitism, to pay off those who cannot be forced. And then, we hit the novel inflection point, and scale further: And so we then use force, law and gossip to suppress the suppressors, and rely entirely upon rule of law, without a group that exercises power. So the sooner one develops rule of law, the sooner one starts suppressing the parasitism of the monopoly. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • What is the Source of Political Power? Organizing Using Three Tools of Coercion.

    –“Curt: Political power ultimately originates from Economics or exchange, right?”—

    [I] am not sure I understand this question. There are three methods of power: 1) force, 2) payment, 3) gossip. One can use those three methods exclusively or in combination to band together into groups or hierarchies, and the focus the group’s efforts on the application of force, payment, or gossip (rallying/shaming/including/ostracizing). Political power – meaning anything ranging from monopoly producer of commons to a distributed production of commons – can be constructed from any one or combination of, those methods of coercion. Political power originates in the ability of humans to organize and coerce. It just so happens that we use gossip to rally and shame and ostracize people from production and opportunity for consumption. But then we scale. It just so happens that you need to use violence to suppress parasitism sufficiently for a market to form, at that scale. But then we scale further. And then to use law to suppress cheating, fraud, and to impose performance, and restitution, and if necessary, punishment. But then we scale further. And then we use wealth created by the application of violence and law and to force market participation rather than parasitism, to pay off those who cannot be forced. And then, we hit the novel inflection point, and scale further: And so we then use force, law and gossip to suppress the suppressors, and rely entirely upon rule of law, without a group that exercises power. So the sooner one develops rule of law, the sooner one starts suppressing the parasitism of the monopoly. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • A Short Course In The Transaction Cost Theory of Government

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/ THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/ GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/ FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/ THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/ PEAK HUMAN http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/ THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

  • A Short Course In The Transaction Cost Theory of Government

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/ THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/ GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/ FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/ THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/ PEAK HUMAN http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/ THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

  • SHORT COURSE IN THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPR

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/A SHORT COURSE IN THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/

    THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/

    GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/

    FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/

    THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/

    PEAK HUMAN

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/

    THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-03 08:18:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF POLITICAL POWER? –“Curt: Political power ultimately origi

    WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF POLITICAL POWER?

    –“Curt: Political power ultimately originates from Economics or exchange, right?”—

    I am not sure I understand this question.

    There are three methods of power: 1) force, 2) payment, 3) gossip.

    One can use those three methods exclusively or in combination to band together into groups or hierarchies, and the focus the group’s efforts on the application of force, payment, or gossip (rallying/shaming/including/ostracizing).

    Political power – meaning anything ranging from monopoly producer of commons to a distributed production of commons – can be constructed from any one or combination of, those methods of coercion.

    Political power originates in the ability of humans to organize and coerce.

    It just so happens that we use gossip to rally and shame and ostracize people from production and opportunity for consumption.

    But then we scale.

    It just so happens that you need to use violence to suppress parasitism sufficiently for a market to form, at that scale.

    But then we scale further.

    And then to use law to suppress cheating, fraud, and to impose performance, and restitution, and if necessary, punishment.

    But then we scale further.

    And then we use wealth created by the application of violence and law and to force market participation rather than parasitism, to pay off those who cannot be forced.

    And then, we hit the novel inflection point, and scale further:

    And so we then use force, law and gossip to suppress the suppressors, and rely entirely upon rule of law, without a group that exercises power.

    So the sooner one develops rule of law, the sooner one starts suppressing the parasitism of the monopoly.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-03 06:23:00 UTC