Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • NATURAL LAW ON ASYMMETRIC IMMIGRATION, STERILIZATION, AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT -“W

    NATURAL LAW ON ASYMMETRIC IMMIGRATION, STERILIZATION, AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

    -“When it comes to criminality there is always a path to redemption that can be based on effort and will and not just time.”-

    No (and all competent psychologists will confirm) some people are absolutely not fixable, and don’t want to be or can’t be fixed (including addicts, pedophiles, psychopaths, and sociopaths), and some people are absolutely positively evil and irredeemable.

    Christian religious and moral optimism and Aryan(Classical) legal and empirical optimism only say that we must exhaust possibilities because otherwise the epistemic problem is the greater risk, and violates the natural common law, by restoring authority rather than prohibiting authority and preserving jury and juridical decidability.

    Some people need to be subject to sterilization and others to capital punishment. Like many things, the industrial revolution temporarily ‘seduced us’ (or at least enough women voters) into the belief we can afford the costs of incarceration and release, despite the overwhelming evidencde to the contrary. Three strikes was a success. But the reduction in capital punishment has been a failure. And the postwar suppression of eugenics (sterilization at least) has been a worse one. And massive seond and third world immigration has made it worse.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-03 14:34:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665004082774278144

  • That’s not true. But collusion between government, central banks, the private se

    That’s not true. But collusion between government, central banks, the private sector, is a violation.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-02 18:39:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664703257225179136

    Reply addressees: @tryanph

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664702245697474570

  • Matt: Why are you forcing that false dichotomy? Elites consist of those that can

    Matt: Why are you forcing that false dichotomy?

    Elites consist of those that can demonstrate coercive power in the three possible means of coercion: social(talking, influencing ), economic(financial), state(court,military).

    False Framing is an act of deception (fraud).

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-31 21:22:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664019599619227649

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664012754120843264

  • @StephenKing The second amendment, which prohibits the State from interfering in

    @StephenKing
    The second amendment, which prohibits the State from interfering in the requirement that all able bodied men insure one another’s life, freedom, liberty, and sovereignty, is one upon which all others depend. It is the means by which the people rule, and insure their soveriegnty themselves, and prohibit rule by other than the people.

    The fact that the founders did not directly specify the natural law of tort, the common empirical law, empirical commonality of dispute resolution and concurrency in voting and legislation, nor the requirement that all men bear responsibility for BOTH the private and common defense, occured only because it was an ancient tradition that was assumed by all – and because they all understood Blackstone; and were trying to recreate the height of western civilization in the Roman Government – after 1500 years of christian superstition and clerical competition.

    The purpose of all western civilization’s traditions, the separate it from all other civilizations, is the institutionalization of maximization of individual responsibility for private and common, and the reciprocal insurance of all others who are obligated to do the same.

    We have overturned most of the behavioral pseudoscience that began with Freud, Boaz, Marx, Lewontin, Gould, the Frankfurt School, the Postmodernists, the historical revisionists, the anti-family feminists, and we’re in the process of overturing the race marxists (the woke). And I work on overturning (as did Scalia) the pseudoscience of law by Rez, Kelsen, and Dworkin.

    You may be a decent soul. And you were a joyous part of my youth and early adutlhood. But you are so far out of your league in these matters that you don’t realize that to those of us for whom these matters are those we’ve mastered, that you spoil the memories you gave us, the moral message in your fictions – practically a mythology in and of itself – and degrade your possible reputation in the future. A future which will, with absolute certainty, refute the present age, as one of sophistry, pseudoscience, and folly – if not equal sedition treason and hatred of mankind as the bolsheviks.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @StephenKing

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 00:35:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662256199734030336

  • RT @StevePender: @ThruTheHayes A = -(-A) Inability to freely dissociate is force

    RT @StevePender: @ThruTheHayes A = -(-A)

    Inability to freely dissociate is forced association.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 00:17:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662251523307446273

  • No it just imposes it’s fault on others by conquering them and forcing it on the

    No it just imposes it’s fault on others by conquering them and forcing it on them, rather than just seducing them as the west does. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 19:31:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662179645888839702

    Reply addressees: @TangPoint @apollonaut_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662178628463935491

  • You’re just emoting. 1) what alternative is there to law? – There isn’t one. 2)

    You’re just emoting.
    1) what alternative is there to law? – There isn’t one.
    2) what set of laws is sufficient to prohibit abuse? – One that provides no cover for the government.
    3) What insures those laws aren’t abused? – The armed populace.

    Don’t blame the law for the fact…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 11:48:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662063269807374336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662046645243068416

  • A CONTRARIAN POSITION ON GERMANY Well aside from camps, if the germans HAD merel

    A CONTRARIAN POSITION ON GERMANY
    Well aside from camps, if the germans HAD merely relocated ‘hostiles to other geographies (as the russians did), then as far as I know, the germans WERE the good guys in keeping the east at bay, in domesticating the east by trade, in the reformation against the corruption of the church, in the spread ofliteracy, in the wars of religion, in the war against napoleon’s destruction and conquest of europe, in the german unification, in their second scientific revolution, and in the first world war. Even in the second world war, in the choice between french imperial authoritarianism, Russian totaliatarian communism, and anglo liberalism, the nazis were largely correct in their attempt to create a secular national religion, to restore the holy roman empire of the german people, to continue their evolution of the east into modernity, to resist the Russians and the communists, when liberalism in central europe was as impossible at eastern stages of development, as liberalism was for russia in domestication of the entirety of their empire.

    So you know. It doesn’t matter what I think. What matters is that the evidence of consequences is that the Germans were correct. If for no other reason than to prevent totalitarian france and totalitarian russia from a repeat of the napoleonic destruction of all germans had worked twoard for over a thousand years.

    It’s pretty hard to argue against national socialism. It’s just harder to argue against a century of war and postwar propaganda.

    I don’t have the ‘right’ so to speak. My job requires I make judgements, not render opinions.

    Sorry.
    Just is.

    Reply addressees: @antigg860413

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 14:47:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661383530239209475

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661372102295838721

  • OMG we have have to make your lies illegal. 😉

    OMG we have have to make your lies illegal. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 14:29:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661016497295355905

    Reply addressees: @PleaseDebunk

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661015984571023366

  • Understood. But… presumes “our support” is sufficient in the absence of the nu

    Understood. But… presumes “our support” is sufficient in the absence of the numbers of other factions, when thats not evident at all. Presumes voting is sufficient for resistance or reform. Overweights christians when they have traditionally been biased to the left, and would still be if leftism wasnt hedonic. Presumes the opposition canceling outlying factions isnt sufficient to constrain outliers. Presumes leaving the door open for the people who are naive or silly, under stress, and just advocating for what they understand, isnt valuable given they will follow any momentum, and are the most likely to show up. James is just repeating the marxist means of critique. I dont see solutions out of him or anyone else. As far as I know my org has the only “not amateurish” solutions. In other words I advocate defeat of people’s bad ideas but dont alienate people by ridicule and insult, when they are a resource.
    cheers.

    Reply addressees: @stonepawz @ConceptualJames

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 04:09:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660860552761991171

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660852865508732930