Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • Is Socialism Dangerous?

    Isn’t 100 Million dead in one century because of a pseudoscientific economic and political system propagated by tyrants from the underclasses enough evidence? Isn’t India’s continued problem with ever-present corruption evidence?

    How do you price the damage done by the soviets, the chinese, the southeast asians, the south americans, the hindus from these experiments with socialism?

    The most capitalist societies provide the greatest benefits by redistribution.

    The most socialist societies provide the worse benefits by redistribution.

    THE ONLY PEOPLE TAUGHT ANYTHING ABOUT SOCIALISM?

    Are liberal arts, and ‘extended high school’ students who are not smart enough to get into STEM classes.  The kind of people who can learn by reading  100-120 IQ) but who are not smart enough to manage science (abstract empiricism).   THe people who follow these mere literary believers in the sub-100 IQ space cannot be blamed. They cannot grasp these matters anyway.  They imitate those that they understand.

    Think of Socialism and Communism as a literary equivalent of Science Fiction and Fantasy (which constitute a libertarian movement).  They are both nonsense extremes.  The arose in nearly the same fashion at nearly the same times, as the myths of the new age.  Socialism and communism the restatement of peasant christianity, and science fiction and fantasy the restatement of pagan aristocracy.

    Rule of law under the common law under natural law, with which we suppress parasitism and free riding;  the credit society under which our behavior is regulated more so by credit and job than by law and religion;  and macro economics in which we attempt to stimulate production sufficiently to keep all employed; and finally genetic and cognitive science – are relatively scientific disciplines.  They are not literary fantasies of socialism or  science fiction.

    Communism, socialism, and the myth of the horrid worker who chose the factory happily, willingly, and enthusiastically, over the subsistence of the farm, are all literary inventions.  None of it is real. None of it happened.

    Utopias always fail.  Socialism and communism were the second attempt to spread a new religion – this time by pseudoscientific literature.  The first time by religious mysticism in ancient era’s version of literature – myth.

    Both have had nothing but evil consequences. 

    Why?  Because only very stupid people believe them, and very stupid people can be led by them.  Unfortunately, very stupid people make up more than half of the living population. In many countries they make up three to four fifths of the population.

    We all seek justification of our reproductive strategies.  The problem for the undesirable, unintelligent, and unproductive is that they are aware of their incompetence but must seek lies to justify their existences.    It must be someone else’s fault. It cannot be that they are human waste products the result of dysgenic over reproduction, and the only reason they live is that we have petroleum products to keep them warm and feed them in winter…  (ouch)

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-socialism-dangerous

  • What Is Libertarian Communism?

    Like “meritocratic communism” it is either an impossibility, or a lie. Most likely a lie to cover an impossibility. Most such lies are created in order to perpetuate fraud by political means by making false moral appeals in an effort to avoid exchanging behavioral limitations for material rewards.

    Libertarianism: universal individual ownership of property, and voluntarily constructed commons.

    Socialism: Universal state ownership of property, and the involuntarily constructed commons, where bureaucratic or authoritarian leaders determine the assignments of work and the distribution of proceeds from the work – (which usually don’t end up existing)  Socialism is a failed experiment.

    Mixed economy: Involuntary organization of the production of commons using representatives who appropriate the proceeds of production.  Plus the voluntary organization of production of goods and services which generates the proceeds that are later redistributed as commons. This is in practice the western model since voters demonstrably do not vote for policy but ideology.

    Direct Economic/market Democracy: The voluntary organization of the production of commons by voting for desired commons with the contributions that one has produced.  Combined with the voluntary organization of production of goods and services which generates the proceeds some portion of which are used to produce commons.  In this model competitive commons are possible, and no monopoly commons are necessary.  But competitive commons are class-weighted.  This is an unlikely experiment except in small, very wealthy communities.

    Direct Redistributive/Shareholder Democracy:  The voluntary organization of the production of commons by voting a SHARE of the proceeds from a mixed economy. Combined with the voluntary organization of production of goods and services, which generates the proceeds some portino of which are used to produce commons.  This means meritocratic contribution to commons but egalitarian decision  of commons. In this model competitive commons are possible, and no monopoly commons are necessary. This is a likely next generation of Government since it eliminates the unnecessary conflcit of monopoly commons and eliminates the existence of politicians who engage in corruption.

    We must organize cooperation (morality)
    We must organize reproduction (family)
    We must organize production (market)
    We must organize commons (government)
    We must organize a monopoly with which to hold our territory (military)

    If you aren’t using these terms then you’re probably engaged in error or lie.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-libertarian-communism

  • Is Socialism Dangerous?

    Isn’t 100 Million dead in one century because of a pseudoscientific economic and political system propagated by tyrants from the underclasses enough evidence? Isn’t India’s continued problem with ever-present corruption evidence?

    How do you price the damage done by the soviets, the chinese, the southeast asians, the south americans, the hindus from these experiments with socialism?

    The most capitalist societies provide the greatest benefits by redistribution.

    The most socialist societies provide the worse benefits by redistribution.

    THE ONLY PEOPLE TAUGHT ANYTHING ABOUT SOCIALISM?

    Are liberal arts, and ‘extended high school’ students who are not smart enough to get into STEM classes.  The kind of people who can learn by reading  100-120 IQ) but who are not smart enough to manage science (abstract empiricism).   THe people who follow these mere literary believers in the sub-100 IQ space cannot be blamed. They cannot grasp these matters anyway.  They imitate those that they understand.

    Think of Socialism and Communism as a literary equivalent of Science Fiction and Fantasy (which constitute a libertarian movement).  They are both nonsense extremes.  The arose in nearly the same fashion at nearly the same times, as the myths of the new age.  Socialism and communism the restatement of peasant christianity, and science fiction and fantasy the restatement of pagan aristocracy.

    Rule of law under the common law under natural law, with which we suppress parasitism and free riding;  the credit society under which our behavior is regulated more so by credit and job than by law and religion;  and macro economics in which we attempt to stimulate production sufficiently to keep all employed; and finally genetic and cognitive science – are relatively scientific disciplines.  They are not literary fantasies of socialism or  science fiction.

    Communism, socialism, and the myth of the horrid worker who chose the factory happily, willingly, and enthusiastically, over the subsistence of the farm, are all literary inventions.  None of it is real. None of it happened.

    Utopias always fail.  Socialism and communism were the second attempt to spread a new religion – this time by pseudoscientific literature.  The first time by religious mysticism in ancient era’s version of literature – myth.

    Both have had nothing but evil consequences. 

    Why?  Because only very stupid people believe them, and very stupid people can be led by them.  Unfortunately, very stupid people make up more than half of the living population. In many countries they make up three to four fifths of the population.

    We all seek justification of our reproductive strategies.  The problem for the undesirable, unintelligent, and unproductive is that they are aware of their incompetence but must seek lies to justify their existences.    It must be someone else’s fault. It cannot be that they are human waste products the result of dysgenic over reproduction, and the only reason they live is that we have petroleum products to keep them warm and feed them in winter…  (ouch)

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-socialism-dangerous

  • The central problem for any society is the elimination of the ‘Evil 80s’. They f

    The central problem for any society is the elimination of the ‘Evil 80s’. They force costs upon all of us.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 10:00:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710405450047602688

    Reply addressees: @DemsRRealRacist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709961829116735488

    IN REPLY TO:

    @JBurtonXP

    I can cite no more conclusive proof of Trump being a liberal than that my colleagues and I seem completely powerless to thwart his agenda.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709961829116735488

  • We are very good at killing. We domesticated ourselves, man, and much of nature

    We are very good at killing. We domesticated ourselves, man, and much of nature with our violence. Violence is a good when put to good use.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:37:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710007025166643200

  • You don’t need to understand the strict construction of law. One in a hundred of

    You don’t need to understand the strict construction of law. One in a hundred of us do. The other 99 have to punish the wicked.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:30:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710005290347921408

  • We are very good at killing. We domesticated ourselves, man, and much of nature

    We are very good at killing. We domesticated ourselves, man, and much of nature with our violence. Violence is a good when put to good use.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:37:00 UTC

  • You don’t need to understand the strict construction of law. One in a hundred of

    You don’t need to understand the strict construction of law. One in a hundred of us do. The other 99 have to punish the wicked.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:30:00 UTC

  • LIMIT OF RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian #properta

    http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/709969951201869825/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=709969951201869825THE LIMIT OF RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE

    #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian #propertarianism https://t.co/3GmFNLEhat

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 01:10:00 UTC

  • Natural Right To Oppressive Religions #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian

    http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/709969832192679936/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=709969832192679936No Natural Right To Oppressive Religions

    #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian #propertarianism https://t.co/qAUkAnLqxp

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 01:09:00 UTC