Theme: Coercion

  • MARKETS: DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED, OR EVOLVED? It’s that men did in fact create mar

    MARKETS: DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED, OR EVOLVED?

    It’s that men did in fact create markets by forcible suppression of alternatives (parasitism) in all walks of life. Now this is different from ‘designed’. The market arises as a consequence of this suppression. So we ‘liberate’ the market as well as man, from parasitism. we construct liberty and market by the same means: suppression of its alternatives. So it’s not that we design the market, it’s that the market evolves from the design of suppression of parasitism. but reality is that market towns were established as were shopping malls today. So trade may exist prior to suppression – but markets are made. cooperation may exist prior to suppression – but liberty is constructed.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-13 03:42:00 UTC

  • ***If you are willing to fight, then you can keep what you kill.***

    ***If you are willing to fight, then you can keep what you kill.***


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-12 01:42:00 UTC

  • If black Americans take this much further we are only going to have to hit light

    If black Americans take this much further we are only going to have to hit light infrastructure and publish demands.

    If you take out the police the next level is military, and then we have won.

    I’ve been stating for years now that it is not as important to plan a revolution as it is to constantly exploit opportunities.

    If the black lives movement wants to save us time, effort, and lives, then that’s all the better.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 12:55:00 UTC

  • Kennedy-Johnson did it. We could have evolved past it otherwise. We should have

    Kennedy-Johnson did it. We could have evolved past it otherwise.

    We should have killed all the rebelling students, socialists, and journalists in the 60’s and ended it then. McCarthyism was a failure because it was – in typical anglo christian fashion – too gentle a movement.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:58:00 UTC

  • The “Kennedy Solution” is the most humiliating for a traitor. You gradually kill

    The “Kennedy Solution” is the most humiliating for a traitor. You gradually kill off their progeny, then the father, leaving only the mother to suffer as an example to future generations.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:57:00 UTC

  • ***I am not concerned with should, I am concerned with shall. Not in persuasion

    ***I am not concerned with should, I am concerned with shall. Not in persuasion but compliance. Not in compromise but in defeat. Not in tolerance but in deportation. And should deportation fail, in hanging, impaling, crosses and pyres.***


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-07 02:15:00 UTC

  • HE WAS WRONG: WAR IS NOT AN EXTENSION OF POLITICS Clausewitz was pretty much wro

    HE WAS WRONG: WAR IS NOT AN EXTENSION OF POLITICS

    Clausewitz was pretty much wrong about everything. War is not an extension of politics. Politics is a means by which we limit war. It is not politics that is the basis of human interaction, but the ever present rational choice between war, conflict, boycott, cooperation, insurance, and kin-sacrifice. Political organizations exist to defend the interests of the group from competitors, and if possible convert the group to the most successful competitor, and therefore the competitor with the greatest discounts on negotiations with other groups. Politics is the extension of cooperation, and when politics fails, we return to the prior state – whatever is in our rational self-interest. But, as we are strong when organized gainst competitors, and weak when disorganized in the fact of competitors, when political solutions fail, we merely choose politically organized conflict of large numbers rather than otherwise organized conflict of smaller numbers – thus allowing us to concentrate our full resources on the conflict in question.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 06:32:00 UTC

  • EPISTEMOLOGY OF FIGHTING —“Russians only understand things properly after a go

    EPISTEMOLOGY OF FIGHTING

    —“Russians only understand things properly after a good fight”— Dmitry Chernov (Priceless)

    The epistemology of fighting has high empirical content and can be trusted. Contrast with the anglo epistemology of commerce. Maybe that is a great way of communicating the difference between our cultures given our vastly different levels of trust.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 02:37:00 UTC

  • IF CIVIL SOCIETY GUN OWNERS WERE A PROBLEM – YOU”D NOW IT

    IF CIVIL SOCIETY GUN OWNERS WERE A PROBLEM – YOU”D NOW IT.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-01 03:55:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748726821777055744

  • IF CIVIL SOCIETY GUN OWNERS WERE A PROBLEM – YOU”D NOW IT

    IF CIVIL SOCIETY GUN OWNERS WERE A PROBLEM – YOU”D NOW IT.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-01 00:00:00 UTC