Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • A militia billing itself as a security force is vowing to protect the Second Ame

    —A militia billing itself as a security force is vowing to protect the Second Amendment. The Three Percent Security force, named after those who fought in the American revolution (It’s said – only three percent of the colonists fought against the king’s tyranny) says they’re preparing to “uphold and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.” They train like a military, “basic infantry man skills, everything from communications to combat lifesaving medical first aid.”—

    three percent is much more than we need today

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 18:11:00 UTC

  • FASCISM, COMMUNISM, MONARCHY – ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ‘BAD’. to: Robby Daniel Dyer

    FASCISM, COMMUNISM, MONARCHY – ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ‘BAD’.

    to: Robby Daniel Dyer

    I don’t have the time this morning to correct you in detail,

    BUT since you’re a smart enough fellow I’ll give you these points to ponder:

    An unlimited market system allows endemic parasitism others and the commons by externality and this is why it never has or will exist – people won’t tolerate it.

    When you say ‘authoritarian’ rule you mean DISCRETIONARY rule. However, rule of law removes discretion by empirical evolution.

    Under rule of law, under natural law, (non-discretionary rule) a monarch merely functions as a judge of last resort, when the subject under consideration is not one of law but long term consequence.

    A monarchy that collects administrative fees (sales taxes or land rent taxes) on the market it administers (polity), may spend that income however it prefers, and in history, it has been small, and they tend to spend it reasonably well. Because otherwise, as individuals, they are open to assassination – usually by their own family members for threatening their social status.

    So while fascism requires discretionary rule, it remains a viable strategy for the conduct of Total War – which was the reason it was invented: to preserve napoleon’s invention of total war, and apply it to the industrial era.

    While communism requires discretionary rule, it also lacks an incentive structure necessary for a voluntary organization of production, so it requires a vast directorial class.

    So when you include monarchy in that list I am not sure what you are talking about. Because christian monarchy dependend eitehr on the common traditional law, or later natural law, or something in between – the restored roman law. No monarch had full license, and the church mandated that fact – and if one’s rule was ‘uninsured’ by the church it meant it was ‘for sale to all commers’ with license.

    As far as I know ‘perfect government’ consists of natural law, independent judiciary (the west’s original priesthood), a military militia, a hereditary monarchy, a market for commons consisting of multiple houses, a market for the production of goods, services, and information, a market for reproduction (marriage), a market for association.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 08:50:00 UTC

  • We are all that stand between profiting from the enslavement of the undomesticat

    We are all that stand between profiting from the enslavement of the undomesticated human animals.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-21 00:50:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/833841373174439936

    Reply addressees: @Realistic_Right

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/833825965713166336

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Realistic_Right

    I was telling my wife this last night. The whole world is arrayed against middle class white people. The brown hordes & elite want us dead. https://t.co/BF7Hc9oNMo

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/833825965713166336

  • Yes, Fascism is an Exceptional Extension of Total War

    YES FASCISM IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL OF WAR (read this or remain stupid) —“Curt, would you still say fascism possesses a useful albeit temporary function?”—Robert Harris Scott Hayes

    Fascism has an EXCEPTIONAL short term function. It is a means of marshaling every resource in a nation for war on all fronts: military, trade, economic, financial, cultural, religious and informational. But it’s as costly as war over the long term. It is a means of warfare. Just as an army is an authoritarian means of organizing a people for physical war, and investing in certain commercial sectors is a means of organizing people for trade and economic war, and organizing credit for financial war….. Fascism allows us even to organize INFORMATION for the purpose of warfare. And that is what the Fascist generation did. War is war. But we do not fight the last battle just because we understand the tactic. Today we have a different tactic. We have a very very very fragile civilization that has been at war for a century or more with the cosmopolitan financial vision of managing the world for their benefit rather than each nation using financial, legal, cultural, and informational institutions to advance each nation WITHOUT exporting capital to others – by PREVENTING the parasitism of the cosmopolitan order we live under. Fascism isn’t necessary because fascism is DISCRETIONARY. We can do the SAME THING without putting a dictator in charge. We can simply starve out the other side by cutting off their means of funding. 1) direct redistribution of fiat liquidity to citizens. 2) demand for warranty of due diligence upon truthfulness (testimonialism) for all speech of all forms in the commons. 3) revocation of the copyright and institution of involuntary creative commons. 4) require sponsorship and full warranty of all costs for any immigrant, and rolling back the 64 immigration act, as well as the 14th and all related judgements. 5) addition of voluntary and involuntary disassociation without limit. I can lengthen this list but it is unnecessary. The first three will end globalism, the academy, the media, the entertainment business, and vague statements from the politicians in short order. Whether you understand these things or not, they will destroy the cosmopolitan attack on western civlization in months. Because they may shame us and harm our status and employability. But we will prosecute, judge, and hang them. Dead people can’t propagandize and lie. Curt Doolittle

  • Yes, Fascism is an Exceptional Extension of Total War

    YES FASCISM IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL OF WAR (read this or remain stupid) —“Curt, would you still say fascism possesses a useful albeit temporary function?”—Robert Harris Scott Hayes

    Fascism has an EXCEPTIONAL short term function. It is a means of marshaling every resource in a nation for war on all fronts: military, trade, economic, financial, cultural, religious and informational. But it’s as costly as war over the long term. It is a means of warfare. Just as an army is an authoritarian means of organizing a people for physical war, and investing in certain commercial sectors is a means of organizing people for trade and economic war, and organizing credit for financial war….. Fascism allows us even to organize INFORMATION for the purpose of warfare. And that is what the Fascist generation did. War is war. But we do not fight the last battle just because we understand the tactic. Today we have a different tactic. We have a very very very fragile civilization that has been at war for a century or more with the cosmopolitan financial vision of managing the world for their benefit rather than each nation using financial, legal, cultural, and informational institutions to advance each nation WITHOUT exporting capital to others – by PREVENTING the parasitism of the cosmopolitan order we live under. Fascism isn’t necessary because fascism is DISCRETIONARY. We can do the SAME THING without putting a dictator in charge. We can simply starve out the other side by cutting off their means of funding. 1) direct redistribution of fiat liquidity to citizens. 2) demand for warranty of due diligence upon truthfulness (testimonialism) for all speech of all forms in the commons. 3) revocation of the copyright and institution of involuntary creative commons. 4) require sponsorship and full warranty of all costs for any immigrant, and rolling back the 64 immigration act, as well as the 14th and all related judgements. 5) addition of voluntary and involuntary disassociation without limit. I can lengthen this list but it is unnecessary. The first three will end globalism, the academy, the media, the entertainment business, and vague statements from the politicians in short order. Whether you understand these things or not, they will destroy the cosmopolitan attack on western civlization in months. Because they may shame us and harm our status and employability. But we will prosecute, judge, and hang them. Dead people can’t propagandize and lie. Curt Doolittle

  • Not Since Slavery…. The White Middle And Working Classes Enslaved

    Not since slavery have we seen people work so hard to justify the taking of the productivity of others – (rough quote of thomas sowell)

  • The Copy and Paste Argument Against Libertarianism

    THE COPY AND PASTE ARGUMENT AGAINST LIBERTARIANISM — Libertarianism has good ideas — And arsenic has good uses as well. Libertarianism has good ideas in so far as i) it attempts (correctly) to produce an amoral analytic political philosophy by reducing all rights to property rights in the anglo contractualist (anglo-saxon) tradition. And ii) because of this it is the only ethical, moral, and political framework capable of competing with cosmopolitan marxism, socialism, pseudo-scientific socialism, postwar conservatism, neo-conservatism. But unfortunately, because the anglo conservatives cannot in a democracy state that conservatism, as demonstrated by Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzche, is and always was, a eugenic group evolutionary strategy, conservatives were barred from ratio-scientific argument. At least, until the end of the 20th century when we had accumulated enough empirical evidence about the nature of man to overcome the religious, pseudoscientific, and wishful thinking visions of man. But while libertarianism contains a at least one good idea, it also has catastrophically bad ideas in (a) the assumptions of the nature of man as balanced between immoral and moral, rather than completely rational, and the higher cost of moral productivity than immoral parasitism to the strongest of individuals, (b) the assumption of the distribution of talents and interests in any population as indifferent rather than as preferring very different orders that better suit their interests, (c) the abandonment of commons because of the inability to solve the problem of choosing, constructing and maintaining commons, (d) the unsurvivability of any such polity without the competitive advantage of commons, (e) the definition of property such that unethical and immoral action is licensed, or a preference not a necessity for the formation of a demographically, economically, and militarily competitive polity, (f) the demand for an authoritarian rule to suppress retaliation against unethical, and immoral actions. (g) and where demand for rule cannot be created, the only individuals who will select for such (remote) polities will be those that consume parasitically upon the products of societies that produce commons – and if sufficiently ‘successful’ in accumulating those parasites, will be exterminated by those polities; (h) especially given that the first, and most necessary common we must produce in any polity is the formal institutions that insure our property rights, from those with greater individual, group, collective, and political resources; As such, ‘liberarianism’ is a recipe for recreating the THE LEVANT, not the western high trust, highly productive, highly innovative, order of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy. Libertarianism is a semitic, tribal, low trust, and ghetto, but not western, social order. THUS ENDETH THE LESSON. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Non Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sovereign Men The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Copy and Paste Argument Against Libertarianism

    THE COPY AND PASTE ARGUMENT AGAINST LIBERTARIANISM — Libertarianism has good ideas — And arsenic has good uses as well. Libertarianism has good ideas in so far as i) it attempts (correctly) to produce an amoral analytic political philosophy by reducing all rights to property rights in the anglo contractualist (anglo-saxon) tradition. And ii) because of this it is the only ethical, moral, and political framework capable of competing with cosmopolitan marxism, socialism, pseudo-scientific socialism, postwar conservatism, neo-conservatism. But unfortunately, because the anglo conservatives cannot in a democracy state that conservatism, as demonstrated by Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzche, is and always was, a eugenic group evolutionary strategy, conservatives were barred from ratio-scientific argument. At least, until the end of the 20th century when we had accumulated enough empirical evidence about the nature of man to overcome the religious, pseudoscientific, and wishful thinking visions of man. But while libertarianism contains a at least one good idea, it also has catastrophically bad ideas in (a) the assumptions of the nature of man as balanced between immoral and moral, rather than completely rational, and the higher cost of moral productivity than immoral parasitism to the strongest of individuals, (b) the assumption of the distribution of talents and interests in any population as indifferent rather than as preferring very different orders that better suit their interests, (c) the abandonment of commons because of the inability to solve the problem of choosing, constructing and maintaining commons, (d) the unsurvivability of any such polity without the competitive advantage of commons, (e) the definition of property such that unethical and immoral action is licensed, or a preference not a necessity for the formation of a demographically, economically, and militarily competitive polity, (f) the demand for an authoritarian rule to suppress retaliation against unethical, and immoral actions. (g) and where demand for rule cannot be created, the only individuals who will select for such (remote) polities will be those that consume parasitically upon the products of societies that produce commons – and if sufficiently ‘successful’ in accumulating those parasites, will be exterminated by those polities; (h) especially given that the first, and most necessary common we must produce in any polity is the formal institutions that insure our property rights, from those with greater individual, group, collective, and political resources; As such, ‘liberarianism’ is a recipe for recreating the THE LEVANT, not the western high trust, highly productive, highly innovative, order of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy. Libertarianism is a semitic, tribal, low trust, and ghetto, but not western, social order. THUS ENDETH THE LESSON. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Non Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sovereign Men The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

  • THE COPY AND PASTE ARGUMENT AGAINST LIBERTARIANISM — Libertarianism has good i

    THE COPY AND PASTE ARGUMENT AGAINST LIBERTARIANISM

    — Libertarianism has good ideas —

    And arsenic has good uses as well.

    Libertarianism has good ideas in so far as i) it attempts (correctly) to produce an amoral analytic political philosophy by reducing all rights to property rights in the anglo contractualist (anglo-saxon) tradition. And ii) because of this it is the only ethical, moral, and political framework capable of competing with cosmopolitan marxism, socialism, pseudo-scientific socialism, postwar conservatism, neo-conservatism. But unfortunately, because the anglo conservatives cannot in a democracy state that conservatism, as demonstrated by Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzche, is and always was, a eugenic group evolutionary strategy, conservatives were barred from ratio-scientific argument. At least, until the end of the 20th century when we had accumulated enough empirical evidence about the nature of man to overcome the religious, pseudoscientific, and wishful thinking visions of man.

    But while libertarianism contains a at least one good idea, it also has catastrophically bad ideas in (a) the assumptions of the nature of man as balanced between immoral and moral, rather than completely rational, and the higher cost of moral productivity than immoral parasitism to the strongest of individuals, (b) the assumption of the distribution of talents and interests in any population as indifferent rather than as preferring very different orders that better suit their interests, (c) the abandonment of commons because of the inability to solve the problem of choosing, constructing and maintaining commons, (d) the unsurvivability of any such polity without the competitive advantage of commons, (e) the definition of property such that unethical and immoral action is licensed, or a preference not a necessity for the formation of a demographically, economically, and militarily competitive polity, (f) the demand for an authoritarian rule to suppress retaliation against unethical, and immoral actions. (g) and where demand for rule cannot be created, the only individuals who will select for such (remote) polities will be those that consume parasitically upon the products of societies that produce commons – and if sufficiently ‘successful’ in accumulating those parasites, will be exterminated by those polities; (h) especially given that the first, and most necessary common we must produce in any polity is the formal institutions that insure our property rights, from those with greater individual, group, collective, and political resources;

    As such, ‘liberarianism’ is a recipe for recreating the THE LEVANT, not the western high trust, highly productive, highly innovative, order of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy.

    Libertarianism is a semitic, tribal, low trust, and ghetto, but not western social order.

    THUS ENDETH THE LESSON.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Non Submission

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Natural Law of Sovereign Men

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-20 10:31:00 UTC

  • YES FASCISM IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL OF WAR (read this or remain stupid) —“Curt,

    YES FASCISM IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL OF WAR

    (read this or remain stupid)

    —“Curt, would you still say fascism possesses a useful albeit temporary function?”—Robert Harris Scott Hayes

    Fascism has an EXCEPTIONAL short term function. It is a means of marshaling every resource in a nation for war on all fronts: military, trade, economic, financial, cultural, religious and informational.

    But it’s as costly as war over the long term. It is a means of warfare. Just as an army is an authoritarian means of organizing a people for physical war, and investing in certain commercial sectors is a means of organizing people for trade and economic war, and organizing credit for financial war….. Fascism allows us even to organize INFORMATION for the purpose of warfare. And that is what the Fascist generation did.

    War is war.

    But we do not fight the last battle just because we understand the tactic. Today we have a different tactic. We have a very very very fragile civilization that has been at war for a century or more with the cosmopolitan financial vision of managing the world for their benefit rather than each nation using financial, legal, cultural, and informational institutions to advance each nation WITHOUT exporting capital to others – by PREVENTING the parasitism of the cosmopolitan order we live under.

    Fascism isn’t necessary because fascism is DISCRETIONARY. We can do the SAME THING without putting a dictator in charge. We can simply starve out the other side by cutting off their means of funding.

    1) direct redistribution of fiat liquidity to citizens.

    2) demand for warranty of due diligence upon truthfulness (testimonialism) for all speech of all forms in the commons.

    3) revocation of the copyright and institution of involuntary creative commons.

    4) require sponsorship and full warranty of all costs for any immigrant, and rolling back the 64 immigration act, as well as the 14th and all related judgements.

    5) addition of voluntary and involuntary disassociation without limit.

    I can lengthen this list but it is unnecessary. The first three will end globalism, the academy, the media, the entertainment business, and vague statements from the politicians in short order.

    Whether you understand these things or not, they will destroy the cosmopolitan attack on western civlization in months.

    Because they may shame us and harm our status and employability. But we will prosecute, judge, and hang them.

    Dead people can’t propagandize and lie.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-18 17:40:00 UTC