Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • UP – WE **WANT** WARLORD RULE – THE MILITIA Warlords MUST take over. That’s the

    https://mises.org/library/wouldnt-warlords-take-overGROW UP – WE **WANT** WARLORD RULE – THE MILITIA

    https://mises.org/library/wouldnt-warlords-take-over

    Warlords MUST take over. That’s the whole point. The question is only their number. A militia of warlords constitutes a distributed dictatorship under which only markets governed by natural law are possible.

    Anarchism? A lot of optimistic bullshit. Go live in Ukraine. in Belarus. In Russia (at least outside of moscow or st Petersburg.) Ukraine (the borderland) is where Jewish separatism of Rothbard was envisioned, under the protection of lithuanian, or polish, or russian empires, allowed financial and commercial gangsterism, while prohibiting physical retaliation. It was a system of organized predation upon the people just as today’s financialism consists of organized predation upon the people while preventing juridical defense from it, and physical retaliation against it.

    And that’s Ukraine today. The pretense of order. But 40+ Gangsters (warlords) we call Oligarchs (Private Property Rulership) with enough money and arms to (a) stack and buy the courts, (b) stack and buy the government, who have their own militaries, and who cannot be displaced, because they can too easily turn the rest of ukraine into a civil war zone like the east, leaving the only option Russian invasion and enforced order – which was exactly the plan all along.

    The reason ukraine is weak, is that it has no militia. Period.

    Rothbardianism consists of nothing but optimistic juvenile platitudes sold to reproductively, socially, economically uncompetitive males, as a wishful separatist movement, so that they might beg not to contribute to a commons that makes the market order possible, and instead, may parasitically exploit it without contribution. ie: separatism. Rothbardian ghetto ethics of intersubjectively verifiable property

    There is only one source of liberty: the organized use of violence to obtain, hold, and advance territory, resources, population, institutions, and capital – by a militia of sufficient scale that they cannot be opposed by any cost effective means, or by any concentration of power. How is that possible: only under genetic, cultural, and institutional homogeneity.

    PERIOD.

    How do you create liberty (permission)? As a byproduct of creating sovereignty in fact. How do you create sovereignty in fact? By organizing a corporation (franchise) of warriors – all of whom obtain a share (dividend) from the market produced by their distributed dictatorship of individual rule.

    But those warriors must be kin or to prevent organization by other than kin selection. A genetically and culturally homogenous population in the ruling class – the militia – must exist for liberty to exist.

    Sorry. Thats western history in a nutshell.

    Rothbard was just a commons marxist (Free Rider) just like Marx was a private property free rider. Just as the Neocons are a political market free riders.

    Monarchy and nobility (aristocracy) didn’t oppress. They domesticated the animal man. And clearly failed to domesticate the borderlands – where parasitic separatists allied with the state to prey upon the people, while preventing their retaliation against them.

    So grow up. Libertarianism is for boys. Men fight. they take. They rule. They profit from rule. They profit from rule by the incremental suppression of every means of profit possible other than productive, fully informed warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality in the markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods, services, and information, and production of commons, institutions, and political orders.

    Men fight. Boys beg from mommy and daddy authority of whatever scale they must.

    Men are sovereign in fact. Boys have a little pretense of liberty by permission.

    THUS ENDETH THE LESSON

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-15 17:02:00 UTC

  • The era of soldiers will soon come to an end, but the era of warriors will never

    The era of soldiers will soon come to an end, but the era of warriors will never end.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-15 11:41:00 UTC

  • WHAT KIND OF ANTI-MARKET ARE YOU? What kind of anti-market activity do you prefe

    WHAT KIND OF ANTI-MARKET ARE YOU?

    What kind of anti-market activity do you prefer?

    – Fascism: anti-market for politics, commons, norms, and limited market for goods, services, and information

    – Libertarianism: anti-market for commons, politics, but market for norms, goods, services, information.

    – Libertinism: anti-market for norms,politics, but market for goods, services and information.

    – Classical Liberalism: markets for good services and information, with limited-market for commons.

    – Aristocracy: markets for everything except law and politics.

    – Democratic socialism: minimum markets for politics, commons, and private property.

    – Socialism: anti market for goods, services, and information

    – Communism: anti market for politics, commons, norms, goods, services, and information.

    CONSERVATIVE (MALE) Social Conservatives limit the market for goods, services, information, norms, commons, politics, to that which is EVIDENTIARY, and imposes no costs, requiring individuals develop agency and discipline – however they do so in archaic moral (childlike) language with a touch of economics thrown in.

    PROGRESSIVE (FEMALE) Social Progressives limit the market for goods services, information, norms, commons, and politics to that which is HYPOTHETICAL, and imposes any possible costs, therefore NOT requiring individuals to develop agency and discipline – however they do so in modern moral and pseudoscientific language.

    The frankfurt school modernized female discourse, but we have had no aristocratic school equivalent (until now) to modernize male language. Why? Uncomfortable Truths that ask us to pay the costs of discipline in pursuit of agency is harder (more expensive in the short term) than Comforting Lies that tell us to forgo the costs of discipline and agency in the short term in favor of consumption (indiscipline) in the short term.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-14 03:04:00 UTC

  • ***Violence is neither good nor bad, it is the change in state that we seek to a

    ***Violence is neither good nor bad, it is the change in state that we seek to achieve by violence that is good or bad.***

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:46:00 UTC

  • Why is non-aggression insufficient? Why do we claim we have duties such as war?

    Why is non-aggression insufficient? Why do we claim we have duties such as war?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:05:00 UTC

  • ( You know, when I challenge people to fight me, I’m not kidding. I’m a middle a

    ( You know, when I challenge people to fight me, I’m not kidding. I’m a middle aged short guy. I have asthma. I’ve survived serious illnesses. But I still subscribe to the duel. And I’m willing to die. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 08:36:00 UTC

  • The contract of the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. Heroism: the redirection

    The contract of the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. Heroism: the redirection of violence to the production of commons. The militia for the defense of the commons. Small, skilled, numbers, Advanced Technology, and Maneuver Warfare – keeping enemies at a distance. The common law of sovereign men (natural law), and the Jury. All of which require reporting: testimonial truth: empirical, observable, description, of existential events.

    That is the origin of the west and its difference from the rest. Everything that is unique and superior in the west derives from that sequence of dependencies. And the slow manufacture of agency, and then sovereignty, through demonstration of agency, in markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, production of polities, and production of justice and defense.

    Everything else is the church, state, academy taking credit for what is the product of truth, contract, and trade among men who personally insure themselves and one another against any alternative other than trade.

    The church is a disicipline of liars. The west evolved differently from the rest in spite of the lies of the church, by preserving the aristocratic religion of western man.

    heroism, militia, meritocracy, sovereignty, truth, and jury.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 10:17:00 UTC

  • RULE OR BE RULED Use violence to Rule and possess sovereignty, liberty, freedom,

    RULE OR BE RULED

    Use violence to Rule and possess sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy, or choose not to, and be ruled by those who deprive you of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy.

    Aristocracy: the organized use of violence to produce sovereignty by denying all others any alternative.

    In other words: natural law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 17:27:00 UTC

  • RATIONAL SELF INTEREST by Joel Davis Assuming self-interest is rational, by puni

    RATIONAL SELF INTEREST

    by Joel Davis

    Assuming self-interest is rational, by punishing all non-reciprocating choices via law, acting in group interest becomes rational.

    I don’t care if you reciprocate by rational self-interest or as a result of high prosociality, as long as you reciprocate.

    Assuming the maximization of group fitness has higher potential yields to individual fitness than any other factor, and assuming the maximization of individual fitness is desired, this is rational self-interest.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-09 06:01:00 UTC

  • Let’s get this straight. The only reason to talk to you and not kill, enslave, o

    Let’s get this straight. The only reason to talk to you and not kill, enslave, or punish you, is if we engage in conversation limited to perfect reciprocity: meaning transparent, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange of information, free of imposition of costs by externality.

    That means if you engage in ridicule, accusation, avoidance, obscurantism, in order to impose or justify an imposition of costs upon me or others, it is preferable prey upon you honestly, truthfully, by means of violence than it is preferable to be preyed upon you by means of stupidity, ignorance, bias, or deceit.

    Why? First question of ethics: why don’t I kill you and take your stuff? (and kill your sons, and rape and enslave your wives and daughters).

    We are past the point of negotiating with the left.

    You are dead.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-08 15:36:00 UTC