TOLERANCE AT COST, OR SUBMISSION BY FREE RIDING?
Tolerance without limit is not tolerance but submission. Inclusion without limit is not inclusion it is conquest – conquest in exchange for not paying the high cost of protecting subsequent generations as you were protected by prior generations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 07:39:00 UTC
Spent today in gun stores in connecticut, and omg there is one here that puts everything outside of texas to shame. It’s unbelievable. It’s just evidence that the more you threaten gun culture the more profitable and dedicated gun owners become. I thought Wade’s Eastside was pretty impressive for it’s hollywood gun collection but omg, this place makes seattle look like a low rent district.
Once you have a carry permit in CT, which is close to a shall issue state, it seems like everything is pretty easy. It’s just waaay harder than it was when I lived here 30 years ago. I mean I took the NRA training way back then and the whole bit. I’ve had my WA license and then my Utah license. But this whole CT thing just looks like a lot of bureaucratic nonsense, that does nothing at all except place a burden on the working class guy who wants to hunt, shoot, or defend life and property.
I cant wait to outlaw frivolous and symbolic laws. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 19:29:00 UTC
PATERNALISM: “TOUGH LOVE”
–“The answer to most of our problems is tough love for our own and massive violence for the rest”—Jerrick Harald
That’s the answer.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 17:22:00 UTC
WHY ARE YOU NOT RECEIVING DIVIDENDS RATHER THAN PAYING TAXES?
Men make orders through violence, and lose orders thru the lack of it.
Civilization was not built by the gentle, but the strong, who profited from the gentle.
When the gentle rule, one experience poverty and conquest.
Therefore:
Step 1: Kill
Step 2: Rule
Step 3: Profit
It’s not complicated. One must only be smarter than the underpants gnomes.
Why aren’t all white militial males obtaining dividends instead of paying taxes?
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 13:46:00 UTC
COMEY AND OBAMA’S FACILITATION OF MUSLIM INVASION
1. Before he bombed the Boston Marathon, the FBI interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev but let him go. Russia sent the Obama Administration a second warning, but the FBI opted against investigating him again.
2. Shortly after the NSA scandal exploded in 2013, the FBI was exposed conducting its own data mining on innocent Americans; the agency, Bloomberg reported, retains that material for decades (even if no wrongdoing is found).
3. The FBI had possession of emails sent by Nidal Hasan saying he wanted to kill his fellow soldiers to protect the Taliban — but didn’t intervene, leading many critics to argue the tragedy that resulted in the death of 31 Americans at Fort Hood could have been prevented.
4. During the Obama Administration, the FBI claimed that two private jets were being used primarily for counterterrorism, when in fact they were mostly being used for Eric Holder and Robert Mueller’s business and personal travel.
5. When the FBI demanded Apple create a “backdoor” that would allow law enforcement agencies to unlock the cell phones of various suspects, the company refused, sparking a battle between the feds and America’s biggest tech company. What makes this incident indicative of Comey’s questionable management of the agency is that a) The FBI jumped the gun, as they were indeed ultimately able to crack the San Bernardino terrorist’s phone, and b) Almost every other major national security figure sided with Apple (from former CIA Director General Petraeus to former CIA Director James Woolsey to former director of the NSA, General Michael Hayden), warning that such a “crack” would inevitably wind up in the wrong hands.
6. In 2015, the FBI conducted a controversial raid on a Texas political meeting, finger printing, photographing, and seizing phones from attendees (some in the group believe in restoring Texas as an independent constitutional republic).
7. During its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified material, the FBI made an unusual deal in which Clinton aides were both given immunity and allowed to destroy their laptops.
8. The father of the radical Islamist who detonated a backpack bomb in New York City in 2016 alerted the FBI to his son’s radicalization. The FBI, however, cleared Ahmad Khan Rahami after a brief interview.
9. The FBI also investigated the terrorist who killed 49 people and wounded 53 more at the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Fla. Despite a more than 10-month investigation of Omar Mateen — during which Mateen admitting lying to agents — the FBI opted against pressing further and closed its case.
10. CBS recently reported that when two terrorists sought to kill Americans attending the “Draw Muhammad” event in Garland, Texas, the FBI not only had an understanding an attack was coming, but actually had an undercover agent traveling with the Islamists, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi. The FBI has refused to comment on why the agent on the scene did not intervene during the attack.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 13:03:00 UTC
So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic reproduction and superstition, or we colonize by eugenic upper class by force and law?
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 14:01:00 UTC
GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION
CHANGE/WAR
1) Socialism = central control of private and commons for the purpose of conducting warfare on one”s own people, for the purpose of transitioning a backward people. Very strong.
2) Fascism = Central control of the commons. Private control of production. But limited to Autarkic opportunities. Funding of nationalism. (fascism is a means of conducting economic warfare in times of stress). Very strong.
3) Napoleonism = total mobilization of the public and private economy for military economic and institutional warfare. Very strong.
—vs–
STEADY STATE / COMMERCE
3) Aristocracy / Monarchy (steady state)
Private ownership of property and commons. but weak.
2) Republicanism / Oligarchy / Nobility (steady state)
Private ownership of property and commons but weak.
1) Social Democracy (steady State)
Private ownership of property and commons but weak.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 10:03:00 UTC
A MANIFESTO FOR THE RETURN TO ARISTOCRACY: YOU LACK COERCIVE POWER OVER YOURSELVES, SO YOU MAY NOT HOLD COERCIVE POWER OVER OTHERS.
The only reason not to kill, enslave, beat, or take from you is if you agree at least to avoid parasitism, and at best to engage in reciprocally rewarding cooperation.
One can walk away in silence, and mind his or her own business, and engage in boycott. This is, at a minimum, a failure to cooperate, and at a maximum, an attempt to separate and form a polity more desirous than the current one. But it is not a violation of reciprocity or sovereignty.
But to engage in ridicule, shaming, rallying, straw men, double standards, conspiracy, propaganda, and advocacy of parasitism to actively violate sovereignty, reciprocity, meritocracy, and the transcendence of man, merely states that we are not longer cooperating, and you are engaging in parasitism and not yet engaging in violence.
As such, as we are no longer cooperating, and you are engaging in parasitism, we no longer possess any incentive other than to engage in predation, including killing, enslaving, punishing, and taking.
The only reason a state allows parasitism, ridicule, shaming, rallying and deceit, is to profit from the creation of conflict by expanding its totalitarian influence over that of reciprocity. The only reason not to kill, enslave, punish, and take from members of the state is if they eliminate means of parasitism, and allow markets to determine reward by merit.
We have no reason any longer, to constrain our violence – violence that we pay the cost of forgoing the use of on a daily if not hourly basis, for the purpose of improving the lot of ourselves, our families, our kin, our nation, and mankind, by the imposition of sovereignty and the incremental evolution of agency.
We spent over a century giving you license to join the aristocracy of meritocracy that constitutes western civilization. You have proven that you are unfit for that membership in the peerage of the sovereign. You lack agency, morality, ethical ability, character necessary for treatment as equal: as sovereigns, and therefore as ‘humans’. You are still an animal, unfit for subsidy, freedom, liberty or sovereignty.
Our experiment was moral, ethical, and pursued out of honest belief in your ability. And our experiment failed. And so we return to our traditional rule, by and return you to domesticated animal conditions.
We could blame you. But you are just animals. You lack the personal agency and the genetic sufficiency, to join the world of sovereign men.
We will grant you protections under natural law, since you are capable, if disciplined, of cooperation.
But you shall no longer hold coercive powers over others, because by your words and deeds, you demonstrably, lack the coercive power over yourselves.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law of Sovereigns
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Industrialization of Agency
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 08:01:00 UTC
RETURN TO COLONIALISM?
If “multiculturalism” is good, then “colonialism” is good. If multiculturalism is bad, the colonialism is bad. What is the difference between invading others and being invaded by others?
Multiculturalism is invasion. Colonization is invasion.
h/t: David Kohler
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 07:19:00 UTC
The (((answer))) is very simple meet shaming, ridicule, lies, frauds, propaganda with violence. The more the better.
Truth is expensive. Violence less so. Ridicule, lies, frauds, and propaganda are cheaper still.
They can produce lies faster than we can produce truth. Therefore the only economic solution is violence.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-07 12:49:00 UTC