https://www.rt.com/news/391753-austria-burqa-ban-integration/AUSTRIA: COMPULSORY INTEGRATION
(including language and dress)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 19:26:00 UTC
https://www.rt.com/news/391753-austria-burqa-ban-integration/AUSTRIA: COMPULSORY INTEGRATION
(including language and dress)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 19:26:00 UTC
WHAT WAS THAT ABOUT CHRISTIANS IN CHINA?
CHINESE police destroyed a church after dragging worshippers out of the building and beating them in the street.
By Katie Mansfield
Violence broke out in Shanggiu in Henan province after 300 police officers and officials demolished the Shuangmiao Christian Church—which was under construction.
Officers dragged out around 40 Christians with one worshipper comparing the brutal scenes to the Japanese invasion of China during the Second World War, according to charity China Aid.
Eight Christians remain in custody following the incident amid a crackdown on churches by the communist regime.
During the demolition, officials beat dozens of church members, pushing them to the ground and twisting their hands
China Aid said: “During the demolition, officials beat dozens of church members, pushing them to the ground and twisting their hands.
“The church was completely razed, and a church member likened the scene to the Japanese invasion of China during World War II.
“Of the 40 Christians seized, eight are still in custody, and the cases of Shuangmiao Christian Church pastor Zhang Di and the church’s vice director, Lü Yuexia, were recently transferred to the Procuratorate, which will decide whether or not to formalise their arrest.”
The Chinese Communist Party has launched a major crackdown on religion
Eight Christians remain in custody
The Supreme People’s Procuratorate is the highest agency in China responsible for prosecutions.
According to churchgoers Xi Jinping’s Communist Party ordered the church to be destroyed after branding the building an “illegal structure”.
Party officials were sent to the church to search the building and belongings of people on site.
China Aid said the party confiscated phones and other personal property, damaged closets, smashed offering boxes, and stole laptops, money, and jewellery.
The demolition came as row between the church and government escalated over allegations the church refused to pay a £450 arbitrary road usage fee.
Pastor Zhang Di was summoned for questioning last month and accused of assaulting police officers and attacking a village official.
Church leaders are urging the government to release the pastor and churchgoers. They are also calling for police linked to the investigation to be punished.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 14:07:00 UTC
PROPERTARIAN CLASS STRUCTURE: THREE METHODS OF COERCION
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 08:36:00 UTC
The way to kill all feminist arguments is to just be honest. “If you want me to treat you as an equal, then I will treat you as a man, and I would beat any man who spoke to me thusly. So my tolerance of your irrationalism, disapproval, ridicule, shaming and rallying, is only because you are a woman, and men do not expect truth, reason, and respect from women. We expect it from one another, and use violence against one another if we do not discourse with truth, reason, and respect. So by using irrationalism, disapproval, ridicule, shaming, and rallying you prove that you are inferior to men, and it is unseemly for men to beat children and females for the same reason.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 09:54:00 UTC
OWNERSHIP IN FACT: POWER.
He who can kill a thing, owns a thing. He who can destroy a thing, owns a thing. He who can take a thing, owns a thing. Everything else is simply the pursuit of some condition even more preferable than killing, destroying, taking a thing. And the only thing preferable is reciprocity by which more can be obtained by productive, voluntary exchange than by killing, destroying, or taking a thing. Conversely, killing, destroying, and taking a thing is preferable to ir-reprocity, by which one’s things are taken by unproductive, involuntary, transfers.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 09:54:00 UTC
Well, it’s just another version of Marxism, right? Central control of resources by some self selected elite in order to pursue some end chosen by those elites?
So instead of pursuing a worker revolution. Instead of pursuing equality under the law. Instead of pursuing equality of opportunity. Instead of pursuing equality of condition. Instead of pursuing equality of outcome. Instead of pursuing the end of class oppression, of economic oppression, of racial oppression, of gender oppression, and now of identity oppression, the left wants once again to control resources and opportunities they cannot demonstrate the ability to conceive, organize, and produce, they want that control *without* demonstrating merit?
What record do democratic governments have of good choices? Any? What do good any governments that are in the lead do? Nothing. Government can drive change if the change is produced elsewhere and the people need to ‘catch up’. But they cannot know what hypothetical goods to pursue.
And for that matter, who is of the opinion that we are already not enduring change faster than our minds, norms, cultures, philosophies, laws, and institutions can adapt to on empirical evidence? We can’t.
We cannot know ‘the good’ other than by discovering something that works and determining what is good. The via positiva fallacy is that we can know what is good, other than what is bad.
We can know what is bad. We can act via negativa to eliminate the bad, and devote resources only to the potential goods.
We know the central ‘bad’: overpopulation by a vast world underclass.
The central problem we face is the REDUCTION OF THE SCALE OF THE UNDER CLASSES.
The rest of the opportunities are rapidly exploited by the private sector as fast as we can manage them. And the only ones they private sector can’t do is space exploration.
No. So no. All this wisfhul thinking is nonsense. FInd something we are behind on that is already proven and government can do that. Find soething that the market CAN’T do that is basic reserach, and maybe that is ok.
Otherwise, governement does one thing: pilfer as much as it can to distribute to cronies.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 20:04:00 UTC
God forbid we should Criticize our enemies or criticize their Collaborators among the police and the government.STOP THREATENING GOOD PEOPLE
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 13:49:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872812946665222144
Reply addressees: @cheshirepolice
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/871998808044994560
IN REPLY TO:
@cheshirepolice
Hate crime can take many forms including verbal or online abuse on social media. If you see it, report it. https://t.co/Cn7dC9s9KQ
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/871998808044994560
We don’t gossip. We fight with arms when reason has failed. Reason has failed. It’s time to take up arms.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 00:43:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872614946017824770
Reply addressees: @SteveTrubilla
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872598917099266048
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872598917099266048
Who do you send to clean the criminals from a government? Someone genteel? Or someone brutal?
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 23:07:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872590983107678208
Reply addressees: @Letterlout
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872580515953610757
IN REPLY TO:
@Letterlout
@curtdoolittle He’s a boot of a man, ill mannered and a bully.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872580515953610757
If you think so, then you will be surprised what uncivilized looks, smells, sounds and feels like should he fail and we come in his stead.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 20:44:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872554785010057218
Reply addressees: @Letterlout
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872441067601317888
IN REPLY TO:
@Letterlout
@curtdoolittle Trump isn’t civilised.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872441067601317888