(FASCISM HAS WON THE WORLD. Every point on the political compass has produced a fascist political order. One merely needs to choose one’s preferred form of fascism.)
Theme: Coercion
-
(FASCISM HAS WON THE WORLD. Every point on the political compass has produced a
(FASCISM HAS WON THE WORLD. Every point on the political compass has produced a fascist political order. One merely needs to choose one’s preferred form of fascism.) -
“You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior
“You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior of some of them. But that’s precisely what you must do in the case of gun owners.” -Kenneth Allen Hopf In other words, a double standard is a violation of reciprocity and under natural law is a crime. -
“You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior
“You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior of some of them. But that’s precisely what you must do in the case of gun owners.” -Kenneth Allen Hopf In other words, a double standard is a violation of reciprocity and under natural law is a crime. -
“You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior
“You must never ever ever generalize about Muslims on the basis of the behavior of some of them. But that’s precisely what you must do in the case of gun owners.” -Kenneth Allen Hopf
In other words, a double standard is a violation of reciprocity and under natural law is a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 10:27:00 UTC
-
Losing Empires
ST LOUIS. The people who lost their empire next most quickly, were the people least willing to kill to maintain it (british). The people who lost them next most quickly were those who tried to maintain them cheaply(french).
The people who lost them next most quickly were those who ran them poorly (russians, mongols). The people who lost their next most quickly, were those who over extended them (roman). The people who held their empires, were those that didn’t overextend them, didn’t run them poorly, didn’t run them cheaply, and who were willing to kill to maintain them (China, Egypt). “Kill them until they stop coming. Then kill all those who you can find. Then kill all their relatives you can find. Then take their best things and burn the rest to the ground – erasing all trace of their existence.” -
Losing Empires
ST LOUIS. The people who lost their empire next most quickly, were the people least willing to kill to maintain it (british). The people who lost them next most quickly were those who tried to maintain them cheaply(french).
The people who lost them next most quickly were those who ran them poorly (russians, mongols). The people who lost their next most quickly, were those who over extended them (roman). The people who held their empires, were those that didn’t overextend them, didn’t run them poorly, didn’t run them cheaply, and who were willing to kill to maintain them (China, Egypt). “Kill them until they stop coming. Then kill all those who you can find. Then kill all their relatives you can find. Then take their best things and burn the rest to the ground – erasing all trace of their existence.” -
The Limits To Political Protest (Please try to control your imbecility. 😉 )
The Limits To Political Protest
https://propertarianism.com/2017/10/02/the-limits-of-political-protest-nfl-and-kneeling/ (Please try to control your imbecility. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-02 11:50:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/914819856658288640
Reply addressees: @worthy248 @pinkpillinc
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/914725148363812864
IN REPLY TO:
@midnghtdreams
@pinkpillinc @curtdoolittle more like a pathetic hissy fit for his safe space of his favorite sport being openly political.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/914725148363812864
-
The Limits of Political Protest (‘NFL and Kneeling’)
THE LIMITS OF POLITICAL PROTEST 1 – There are limits to interpersonal action – that is the meaning of ‘ethical‘. 2 – There are limits to social action – that’s the meaning of ‘moral‘. 3 – There are limits to political action – that is the meaning of ‘sacred‘.
1 – There are circumstances that are ethically constrained and circumstances that are not. 2 – Circumstances that are morally constrained and circumstances that are not. 3 – Circumstances that are sacred and constrained, and circumstances that are not. Festivals, Rituals, Churches, and Courts are sacred because the function of these venues is to deprive us of individualism such that we bond in equality outside of the competitive markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and political power. These venues are not markets. We have markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and political power. We agree to, and are habituated to, peaceably compete in those markets only because we agree to preserve the sacred, the moral, and the ethical outside of them. We balance market differences with ethical, moral, and sacred equalities. These venues are for demonstration of self sacrifice for the development of trust among super predators that cohabitate in close proximity. To politicize festival and ritual is to violate the ethical, moral, and sacred and to create division in that medium the sole purpose of which is to unite us. If you destroy our means of sacredness, morality, and ethics, then you destroy our ability to trust one another. It is precisely the function of ethical, moral, and sacred conditions that allow us to develop the trust that is necessary for personal, social, and political mindfulness, and the consequences of our trust or lack of it. And that is what has been happening – by design – since the 1960’s. The left has worked diligently to undermine the ethical (truth), the moral (family and responsibility), and the sacred (limits to selfishness). The only step after violating the sacred is civil war. The fact that anyone would violate sacredness and politicize a festival (Ritual) is simply evidence that we are already in a cold civil war. And we are very close to a hot civil war that will tear it all to pieces. -
The Limits of Political Protest (‘NFL and Kneeling’)
THE LIMITS OF POLITICAL PROTEST 1 – There are limits to interpersonal action – that is the meaning of ‘ethical‘. 2 – There are limits to social action – that’s the meaning of ‘moral‘. 3 – There are limits to political action – that is the meaning of ‘sacred‘.
1 – There are circumstances that are ethically constrained and circumstances that are not. 2 – Circumstances that are morally constrained and circumstances that are not. 3 – Circumstances that are sacred and constrained, and circumstances that are not. Festivals, Rituals, Churches, and Courts are sacred because the function of these venues is to deprive us of individualism such that we bond in equality outside of the competitive markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and political power. These venues are not markets. We have markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and political power. We agree to, and are habituated to, peaceably compete in those markets only because we agree to preserve the sacred, the moral, and the ethical outside of them. We balance market differences with ethical, moral, and sacred equalities. These venues are for demonstration of self sacrifice for the development of trust among super predators that cohabitate in close proximity. To politicize festival and ritual is to violate the ethical, moral, and sacred and to create division in that medium the sole purpose of which is to unite us. If you destroy our means of sacredness, morality, and ethics, then you destroy our ability to trust one another. It is precisely the function of ethical, moral, and sacred conditions that allow us to develop the trust that is necessary for personal, social, and political mindfulness, and the consequences of our trust or lack of it. And that is what has been happening – by design – since the 1960’s. The left has worked diligently to undermine the ethical (truth), the moral (family and responsibility), and the sacred (limits to selfishness). The only step after violating the sacred is civil war. The fact that anyone would violate sacredness and politicize a festival (Ritual) is simply evidence that we are already in a cold civil war. And we are very close to a hot civil war that will tear it all to pieces.