Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • UNDERSTOOD 1. A conservative questions overestimation of reason, and above all q

    https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD

    1. A conservative questions overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus.

    2. As a means of questioning, a conservatives requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).

    3. Conservatism requires ‘empirical’ results, and where empirical fails ‘traditional’ since traditional survived empirical tests of reality.

    4. Accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital, attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.

    5. Conservatism is a eugenic reproductive strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families.

    6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.

    7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.

    The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.

    As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because it is antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.

    **Soveriengty requires reciprocity

    Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.

    Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.

    Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.

    Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.

    But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**

    DOMESTICATION

    Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.

    CONSERVATIVES

    Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.)

    Conservatives are actively suppressed in academy and media.

    This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.)

    **AUTHORS TO READ

    **Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen.

    (The essayists are nonsense)

    Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions.

    **READING LIST

    **Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/).

    My reading list (above) contains most of the science we’ve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists.

    CheersUpdated Dec 28, 2017, 10:21 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 22:21:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: Hmm… Romans considered slavery a process of domesticati

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: Hmm… Romans considered slavery a process of domesticating wild human animals. American colonialists considered their own a little more charitably, and considered africans far less charitably. Roman slavery generally allowed you to progress upward and outward. Slavery beg…..

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: Hmm… Romans considered slavery a process of domesticati

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: Hmm… Romans considered slavery a process of domesticating wild human animals. American colonialists considered their own a little more charitably, and considered africans far less charitably. Roman slavery generally allowed you to progress upward and outward. Slavery beg…..

  • Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres

    Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres.

  • Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres

    Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres.

  • Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres

    Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 18:51:00 UTC

  • PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQU

    PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQUIDATION”

  • REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQUIDATION

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/12/28/russia-bomb-confirmed-terror-putin-calls-terrorists-liquidated-spot/PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQUIDATION”Updated Dec 28, 2017, 4:21 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 16:21:00 UTC

  • PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQU

    PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQUIDATION”

  • How Is Roman Slavery Different From American Slavery?

    Hmm… Romans considered slavery a process of domesticating wild human animals. American colonialists considered their own a little more charitably, and considered africans far less charitably.

    Roman slavery generally allowed you to progress upward and outward. Slavery began with agrarianism and ended with industrialism. So american slavery began with indentured servitude (contract slavery), and ended with chattel slavery (people as domesticated animal property).

    In the ancient world, man was everywhere primitive and violence and starvation a constant threat. The romans ‘civilized’ people by the developmental sequence ‘wild(barbarian)’ -> Slavery-Child -> Soldier(Serf) -> Freeman(property) -> Citizen (political participation) -> “Peer” or Politician -> Nobility. Some people could make the transition and some could not. (Just like today under market conditions.)

    In the American world, we were very little different from the Roman, but far more domesticated from centuries of manorialism.

    It is too impolitic to answer this question honestly and directly. But in general, there is a very large difference between the late medieval and early modern european who was genetically middle class, and underutilized capital, in a europe where the church had made half of the territory into dead, rent-seeking, capital —-and the industrial world (after 1830) where we were importing people who were not (in the majority) from the genetic middle class, not pent up human capital in large numbers, into a world where capital (land) was freely available.

    We are still struggling with this problem a century and a half later. Race is immaterial outside of politics and marriage, but CLASS IS NOT. And class is a consequence of current and past genetics.

    And the problematic difference between racial groups is how successful or unsuccessful they have been at suppression of underclass reproduction over the past thousand years. Because with that suppression you get east asians, europeans, and ashkenazi jews. But without it you get the entire rest of the world: underclasses so large that it is not possible for their middle and upper classes to create a high trust high velocity socio-political economy.

    You can measure all personality traits, IQ, testosterone levels, and age of onset of puberty. If you measure these traits in all groups you will rapidly see that the differences between the groups is largely demographic: class size.

    https://www.quora.com/How-is-Roman-slavery-different-from-American-slavery