Theme: Coercion

People Do Publicly Disassociate from The Institute
Yes. It happens. People publically disassociate. We just had another person cave to the external pressure. John Mark, our best advocate, and marketer, who wold have been our preferred face of the institute had to disassociate when the FBI threatened his family. I would say at least three of our best people had marital or employment risks that caused them to withraw. Some others were on the fascist dispostion and we can’t sell reciprocity with imposition by totalitarianism, so they’re out.

Most of these people who disassociate continue to actively follow and participate and practice the methods, but they avoid open social media because it puts their employment at risk. This is why telegram and signal are so popular compared to twitter. And facebook before they bent to the leftist tyrannists, gave us broader reach and the ability to discover and train more talent.

If humans were truthful we wouldn’t need the study of truth. Humans aren’t, and thats why we have it. It’s also why the truth is so controversial: we evovled to negotiate including negotiate by deception and fraud. We didn’t evolve to negotiate truthfully. that only happens at the margins. I mean, once you study how mothers manipulate children you understand they’re largely lying in one way or another to do it – just so that children remain under their control while they develop the agency necessary for independence/

We (I) completed the aritotelian project. It sounds nuts, but it’s simply true. But it’s about as hard to learn as the combination of behavioral econ, law, and cognitive science at the upper undergrad, or grad level, and it takes a couple of years. As long as any other degree. Brad’s a Phd for example and he works with me like a grad student would, and it’s taken him two and a half years, and he’s just become competent to write proofs on his own at this point.

That means you have to be willing to trust that your investment will be worthwhile. That means you must have some understanding of what we’re doing in order to bear the cost of that trust.

This is why we focus on gradual accumulation of talent until we have social proof from that talent that overcomes the question of expending the investment in time to learn what is the equivalent of any other STEM field – but is, just as physics is the root of the physical STEM courses, our work ist he root of the behavioral STEM courses.

A clam that sounds rediculous from the outside but ‘s obvious from the inside. ‘Cause the whole universe becomes very easily comprehensible as a very simple hierarchy of a very simple principle of evolutionary computation of the defeat of entropy.

Cheers

Reply addressees: @cruel_hiraeth @MudKevin

Why Are People Cautious of Association With The Institute?
People who are in cancelable employment positions often exit public participation with us becaues of the controversial nature of our work – especially on lying, but more specifically, how the left lies, and how their lying (unlike male lying by systematic fictionalisms) originates in the female method of warfare, and it’s integration into the abrahamic to marxist sequence of methods of civilizational warfare by sedition (undermining within), and how we can outlaw both that feminine and masculine lying in politics. Which, if you don’t know, is the primary reformation we’re bringing to constitution, law, and policy, and especially across the Cathedral complex of academy, state, media, and finance – all of which are free riders on the capital that european civilization has produced in particular in the high trust and cooperation between the sexes and classes on mutually (reciprocally) beneficial terms, which results in the normal pareto distribution of responsibilty for capital given the natural normal distribution of capacity for responsibilty for capital in humans.

Reply addressees: @FrankRe07770590 @MudKevin