Theme: Coercion

  • Why do you deserve to share this world with us? He who can destroy a thing, owns

    Why do you deserve to share this world with us? He who can destroy a thing, owns a thing- all else is permission. The first question of politics is why I and mine (if we can) do not kill you and yours and take your stuff. The only answer is that it is more beneficial to cooperate.

    Until it is no longer more beneficial to cooperate.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 15:18:00 UTC

  • (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.) SOME

    (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.)

    SOME RADICAL LEFTIST ASKED ME HOW PROPERTARIANISM WOULD JUDGE HITLER’S GERMANY’S RELOCATION POLICY

    It was a dishonest attempt to bait hate speech. I don’t do hate speech. Ever. I do Science and Natural Law.

    Here is the Answer:

    (a) That high trust is nearly exclusive to the germanic and Japanese peoples, and is their civilization’s competitive advantage.

    (b) That outside of scientific researchers (scientists) non kin shouldn’t cohabitate in the fist place, because it reduces trust, and creates those exact conditions of conflict. (The upper intellectual classes are more autistic and less dependent upon collective for information, and the lower classes the opposite).

    (c) That peoples that specialize in rent seeking and profiting from moral hazard in particular shouldn’t be hosted (any more than those dependent upon begging and thievery) because it leads to prosecution, persecution, and at times, extermination – as well as destroying trust and raising costs of policing the commons.

    (d) That peoples who practice separatism of any kind shouldn’t be tolerated by host societies for those same reasons.

    (e) That this process of separation, if pursued, should be legislated with a multi-year timeline, later prosecuted for non-compliance, and then subject to Hoppe’s “Forcible Removal”.

    (f) That the original relocation model, taken from the Soviet Relocations, had been successful there, and truthfully, throughout all human history.

    (g) That the combination of relocation (forcible removal) and a nearly impossible war was unmanageable. And that they could not fund both. Had they not been pressured by Russia into war, they would have succeeded.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 08:36:00 UTC

  • THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION WITH VIOLENCE AND POLITICAL INTENT

    THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION WITH VIOLENCE AND POLITICAL INTENT. WE DID IT WITH A SELF ORGANIZING MARKET – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THAT DIFFERENCE?

    Their ‘Cultural Revolution’ involved granting liberal tolerance to defectors, then rounding them up and brutally killing them in the streets. A uniquely Chinese degree of practical political violence. Their difference in value of individual human life, and intra-cultural trust is evident. A difference we have only attributed to competitive outsiders and religious defectors.

    Our ‘Cultural Revolution’ (means of identifying defectors, and those with in-group defects) is a free market where the defectors and defective are self-identifying by self-organizing.

    Where the Chinese exterminated to maintain homogeneity, we can merely politically separate.

    *Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.*

    Look at the current crisis – genocide against our people – as an opportunity to voluntarily exit from the gene pool those costly genes that impede our transcendence into Overmen (gods).

    Where we could struggle for another thousand years or more to produce a eugenic meritocratic, aristocratic, high trust, high commons, order – we can instead, radically separate not only others, but our own, and make a rapid leap in evolutionary progress.

    Revel in our time. Few men have the opportunity to leave a mark not only on history – but on the transcendence of mankind.

    This is the greatest opportunity since the failed construction of Roman Walls. Again – the Chinese succeeded where we have failed; for the simple reason that they use extraordinary violence to produce a hierarchical monopoly, where we use the violence necessary to produce a market of voluntary cooperation.

    This insight helps us understand not just the Chinese method, but how our method differs, and where it is stronger (innovation and velocity) and where it is weaker (markets make one vulnerable to greed that consumes genetic, cultural, institutional, behavioral, and knowledge capital.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-26 07:34:00 UTC

  • They Hath Gambled a War

    —“We are glad the Enemy are so pleasant with us. Their threat, and our pains we thank them for. When we have matched our hearts and sinews to these Arms, We will in The West, by God’s grace, play a match That shall strike their Jester’s crown into the hazard. So, tell Them they hath gambled a war with us. That all the cities of the West will be disturbed With fires. And we understand Them well, How they come o’er us against our wilder Ages, Not measuring what use we made of them.”—

  • They Hath Gambled a War

    —“We are glad the Enemy are so pleasant with us. Their threat, and our pains we thank them for. When we have matched our hearts and sinews to these Arms, We will in The West, by God’s grace, play a match That shall strike their Jester’s crown into the hazard. So, tell Them they hath gambled a war with us. That all the cities of the West will be disturbed With fires. And we understand Them well, How they come o’er us against our wilder Ages, Not measuring what use we made of them.”—

  • Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate

    “Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.” We have nothing to sell, only violence to impose. The cataclysm is trivially easy to accomplish. No empire in history has ever been so fragile with so many hyenas nipping at its heels. The rats have nowhere to flee.

  • Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate

    “Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.” We have nothing to sell, only violence to impose. The cataclysm is trivially easy to accomplish. No empire in history has ever been so fragile with so many hyenas nipping at its heels. The rats have nowhere to flee.

  • Violence Is the Gold Standard

    —“Violence is the gold standard, the reserve that guarantees order. In actuality, it is better than a gold standard, because violence has universal value. Violence transcends the quirks of philosophy, religion, technology and culture. People say that music is a universal language, but a punch in the face hurts the same no matter what language you speak or what kind of music you prefer. If you are trapped in a room with me and I grab a pipe and gesture to strike you with it, no matter who you are, your monkey brain will immediately understand “or else what.” And thereby, a certain order is achieved.”—Jack Donovan

  • Violence Is the Gold Standard

    —“Violence is the gold standard, the reserve that guarantees order. In actuality, it is better than a gold standard, because violence has universal value. Violence transcends the quirks of philosophy, religion, technology and culture. People say that music is a universal language, but a punch in the face hurts the same no matter what language you speak or what kind of music you prefer. If you are trapped in a room with me and I grab a pipe and gesture to strike you with it, no matter who you are, your monkey brain will immediately understand “or else what.” And thereby, a certain order is achieved.”—Jack Donovan

  • VIOLENCE IS GOLDEN: The original quote was translated incorrectly. Not silence,

    VIOLENCE IS GOLDEN: The original quote was translated incorrectly. Not silence, but violence.;)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-22 16:11:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1010193505673728001