Theme: Coercion

  • It’s really simple: Sprawl. Car culture. The necessity of cars. And the teen dea

    It’s really simple: Sprawl. Car culture. The necessity of cars. And the teen death rate due to automobile fatalities. Research MADD mothers against drunk driving in the 1980s which was one of the most successful social campaigns in recent history.

    If you study the data at all it’s just that teens vastly overestimate their competency when driving and vastly oversetimte their predictive competency when distracted.

    My neice nearly had her brain left on the road riding in a car with a teen driver. It changed her forever. Thankfully she’s functional today but only after relearning everything including walking and talking. She still gives talks on the subject.

    As someone who as worked in the funeral biz the worst thing in the world aside from motorcycles and alcohol, is a teen driver with or without alcohol.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 23:32:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712249879345455104

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712161475932897488

  • Not an argument. All that matters is Hamas – or, any other actor willing to cond

    Not an argument. All that matters is Hamas – or, any other actor willing to conduct violence in exchange for risk. You apparently are under the illusion that what ordinary people claim they want is relevant – ever.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 00:30:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711901996591055120

    Reply addressees: @scottre26776207 @AmiDar @adventuregirl

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711900219154051503

  • I am forbidded by threat to talk about fight club. But let us say that it will t

    I am forbidded by threat to talk about fight club.
    But let us say that it will take two million of us to ‘show’ and delivery like the founders a common law suit against the state for a redtess of greivances. Upon that issue they will have no choice because our demands are moral…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-10 01:18:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711551676677566530

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711547258292797700

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: THE LAW OR WAR These are the only two choices. The natural sta

    RT @ThruTheHayes: THE LAW OR WAR

    These are the only two choices.

    The natural state of nature is amoral; homo sapiens sapiens are amoral c…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-09 21:47:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711498636364804422

  • DEFINITIONS: “BAITING INTO HAZARD” (Seduction) Defining a Hazard – “In old Engli

    DEFINITIONS: “BAITING INTO HAZARD” (Seduction)

    Defining a Hazard – “In old English law an unlawful game at dice, those who play at it being called ‘hazardors’. In modern law, any game of chance or wagering.”

    Creating a Hazard – A failure of due diligence in defending others against a hazard you are either aware of or have created. i.e. a failure to cover a well-hole that a child can fall into. Old but common one: refrigerators with locking doors left at junkyards with the door on, so that children can get inside, suffocate, or starve, and die.

    Moral Hazard – When a party with more information about its actions or intentions has a tendency or incentive to behave against the interests of the other party with less information. Usury, Prostitution, and Drugs are the most common moral hazards. The most common topic on law involves insurance schemes, where one is incentivized to commit arson or murder simply because one has insurance on the building or person.

    Defining A Moral Hazard

    The lack of incentive to guard against risk where one is protected from its consequences, lack of incentive to guard against risk where one is protected from its consequences

    In Insurance. The risk, danger, or probability that the event insured against may happen, varying with the circumstances of the particular case.

    In Fire Insurance. The risk or danger of the destruction of the insured property by fire, as measured by the character and interest of the insured owner, his habits as a prudent and careful man or the reverse, his known integrity or his bad reputation, and the amount of loss he would suffer by the destruction of the property or the gain he would make by suffering it to burn and collecting the insurance.

    In Economics. Moral hazard occurs when an entity has an incentive to increase its exposure to risk because it does not bear the full costs of that risk.

    In Tort Law – “A tiger trap presents a hazard not only to the tiger, but to man.”

    In Politics … the entire leftist corpus of freedom from responsibility for scarcity, behavior, and evolutionary consequences.

    Examples of Moral Hazard
    1) If I entice you into buying drugs, I’m baiting you into a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. (Pushers)
    2) If I lend you money or extend you credit to buy alcohol or drugs, creating a vicious cycle of debt and addiction.
    3) If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. (Gambling houses)
    4) If I lend you money or extend you credit to gamble. (Bookies)
    5) If I lend you money at usurious prices that will entrap you in debt cycles. (Loan Sharking)
    6) If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution.
    7) If a woman implies access to friendship, affection, or sex, in exchange for goods services favors opportunity – which she will never deliver.
    8) If I promise you life after death if you obey and undermine the upper classes. (Abrahamism)
    9) If I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard.
    10) If I promise you power and equality if you undermine the political system (Marx)
    11) If I promise you equality if you undermine men (feminism)
    12) If I promise you status if you undermine the status hierarchy (postmodernism)
    13) If I appeal to your morality and pass the hart cellar immigration act. (frankfurt school)
    14) If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard.
    15) If I promise you the end of whiteness and whites will improve your condition when it is only under whiteness –  meaning sciences – and their rule that has improved your condition, and that your condition reflects that of your ancestors.

    In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap. These are all lies that bait you into hazard (risk and loss).

    Reply addressees: @PsychoPsmith


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-09 18:50:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711454221436887041

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711451548784746545

  • The FBI has asked me (not so politely) not to talk about fight club. I respect t

    The FBI has asked me (not so politely) not to talk about fight club. I respect that they are fulfilling their duty. I am fulfiling mine. When the opportunity arises I wont matter other than having provided the solution.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-08 22:27:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711146440204972245

    Reply addressees: @DokicNathanial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711138592821850138

  • I don’t view it incorrectly. Look it up:Trifunctionalism. Read Dumezil. When you

    I don’t view it incorrectly.
    Look it up:Trifunctionalism. Read Dumezil.
    When you’re done ask me to explain the only possible institutions of coercion, and how each civilization evolved them, and what the consequences were.
    Aristocracy is the term for rule by the best, and that was always the military families. Christianity was possible because it gave the women slaves and bottom classes a means of status in aristocratic civilization, despite no ability or resources – by just doing nothing wrong.

    Reply addressees: @MinClaydough


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-07 00:56:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710459111664398338

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710455640617877932

  • Legal Definitions United States: In the U.S., hate speech is generally protected

    Legal Definitions
    United States: In the U.S., hate speech is generally protected by the First Amendment unless it incites violence or constitutes a “true threat.” The legal threshold is high, focusing on the imminent danger of harm.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 22:40:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710424888345800799

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @Real_SF

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710421563932057708

  • Legal Definitions United States: In the U.S., hate speech is generally protected

    Legal Definitions
    United States: In the U.S., hate speech is generally protected by the First Amendment unless it incites violence or constitutes a “true threat.” The legal threshold is high, focusing on the imminent danger of harm.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 22:40:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710424888287088640

  • No one disagrees. But without INCENTIVES we all pursue our instincts and opportu

    No one disagrees. But without INCENTIVES we all pursue our instincts and opportunities. So, we need law to prohibit antisocial behavior in the female model as thoroughly as the male model, so that the incentives exist to adapt. Otherwise they have no incentive to do so.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 02:13:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710116109167337879

    Reply addressees: @AStev1689 @BobbyBrisket @SamW_NGC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710114225538863414