(Quote of the Day)
—“I don’t agree that physical violence is always the answer, but thats only because I prefer to mentally violate people who cant be reasoned with.”— A Female Friend
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 17:12:00 UTC
(Quote of the Day)
—“I don’t agree that physical violence is always the answer, but thats only because I prefer to mentally violate people who cant be reasoned with.”— A Female Friend
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 17:12:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
“Incremental Suppression is a marginal approach to enforcement, a bologna slice strategy. If you are powerful, you identify the most egregious instances of violation and go after those first, working your way down the list until itâs no longer worth the cost. If you are not powerful, you identify the violators within your reach and begin suppressing them, working your way outward as your power grows and your enemiesâ diminish.” – Ely Harman
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 12:41:22 UTC
“Incremental Suppression is a marginal approach to enforcement, a bologna slice strategy. If you are powerful, you identify the most egregious instances of violation and go after those first, working your way down the list until it’s no longer worth the cost. If you are not powerful, you identify the violators within your reach and begin suppressing them, working your way outward as your power grows and your enemies’ diminish.” – Ely Harman
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 08:41:00 UTC
“Incremental Suppression is a marginal approach to enforcement, a bologna slice strategy. If you are powerful, you identify the most egregious instances of violation and go after those first, working your way down the list until it’s no longer worth the cost. If you are not powerful, you identify the violators within your reach and begin suppressing them, working your way outward as your power grows and your enemies’ diminish.” – @[100001544898362:2048:Ely Harman]
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 08:41:00 UTC
THE FALSE DICHOTOMY OF SOCIALISM VS CAPITALISM
What kind of government? Rule of Law, or Rule by Discretion? It’s an easy question.
Natural Law Capitalism (markets in everything, limited by externality) must emerge under rule of law since no other option is available. The only externality is black markets (crime) to profit by imposition of costs by externalities. All other forms of circumventing rule of law by rule of discretion will simply breed special interests, monopolies, rents, and corruption – as well as black markets
One of the great intellectual scams of the 19th and 20th centuries is to sell the replacement of rule of law, with arbitrary rule – by selling capitalism (unlimited free trade capitalism that tolerates externalities), versus socialism (discretionary rule socialism that manufactures externalities in volume).
There is no alternative to a mixed economy. The alternative is between rule of law mixed economy (dividends to shareholder-citizens), and arbitrary rule mixed economy (dividends to the political class and their enablers).
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 08:16:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
–“Beatings are, in fact, effective.”–Shalamov
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 00:22:06 UTC
Violence is the only answer. It is the least expensive, fastest, most certain answer, with the most dependable consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 23:59:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020095802839126016
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Violence is the only answer. It is the least expensive, fastest, most certain answer, with the most dependable consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 23:59:12 UTC
–“Beatings are, in fact, effective.”–Shalamov
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 20:22:00 UTC
Violence is the only answer. It is the least expensive, fastest, most certain answer, with the most dependable consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 19:59:00 UTC