Theme: Coercion

  • “Might makes rights.”

    —“You have no right…”— Rights are determined by men with guns, swords, and spears. In then absence of reciprocity men have no incentive to produce rights – they have the opposite incentive. “Might makes rights.” That’s just a truism.

  • “Might makes rights.”

    —“You have no right…”— Rights are determined by men with guns, swords, and spears. In then absence of reciprocity men have no incentive to produce rights – they have the opposite incentive. “Might makes rights.” That’s just a truism.

  • On the Matter of American Police

    There are a number of serious problems with current legislation: 1) The production of stress and vulnerability: The use of single officers in patrol cars, rather than pairs or more of officers of different ranks patrolling together. The consequence is more violence because officers are under greater stress, because they are under greater risk. If you travel the world the idea of a single police officer is …. ridiculous. Partly because of this our officers are taught significantly more about restraining individuals quickly and harshly, and using weapons aggressively, whereas in the rest of the world they are taught to use numbers and time to de-escalate, and not manhandle the citizenry – which creates the resentment. Just the fact of having six to ten men around you when you’re afraid and angry tends to reduce resentment. 2) Escalation of Charges bot by Police and By Prosecutors (Lying) Let’s be honest. Cops lie all the time. The reason being that they are not allowed to err. The reason cops must fear error is that we expect too much from human beings who are too often too vulnerable, operating under stress, and having to make snap judgements, using training that accelerates violence rather than de-escalates. 3) Training and Trust The failure to train citizens of all ages to submit to arrest (big, big, big problem) and trust the system. The only remedy to this problem is to reduce the stress of the suspect such that he is somehow rewarded for complicity and somehow punished for resistance. This whole ‘throw people to the ground’ has gotten out of hand. So the problem is we no longer reward people for telling the truth, and no longer reward people for not resisting arrest. And we no longer take the deescalation time such that they will tell the truth and resist arrest, and we do so because officers are too vulnerable acting in small numbers. 4) The Production of Police vs Citizen Stress and Anger: The law is also no longer limited to simple rules that reinforce natural law, but put citizens and officers in conditions of opposition, and misunderstanding. The truth is that legislative law is incomprehensible, where as reciprocity (natural law) is both intuitive and comprehensible – and is largely how our courts adjudicate offenses. Most law just empowers the officers and prosecutors to intervene, whereas most adjudication simply looks into reciprocity (rights). 5) The Production of Social and Political Stress and Anger: Why? Our current laws cause conflcit because they do not allow us to act in our interests in defense of our lives, family, property, status, honor, reputation, and family roles – much less our businesses, and even less our norms traditions, laws, and institutions. This change began with the civil war and continues for the same reasons: voluntary disassociation and defense of social as well as personal investment is necessary if for no other reason that the combination of proximity and inequality damages both groups which rely on signaling for happiness , friendship, mating, family preservation, and economic and political order. Aug 06, 2018 6:28pm

  • On the Matter of American Police

    There are a number of serious problems with current legislation: 1) The production of stress and vulnerability: The use of single officers in patrol cars, rather than pairs or more of officers of different ranks patrolling together. The consequence is more violence because officers are under greater stress, because they are under greater risk. If you travel the world the idea of a single police officer is …. ridiculous. Partly because of this our officers are taught significantly more about restraining individuals quickly and harshly, and using weapons aggressively, whereas in the rest of the world they are taught to use numbers and time to de-escalate, and not manhandle the citizenry – which creates the resentment. Just the fact of having six to ten men around you when you’re afraid and angry tends to reduce resentment. 2) Escalation of Charges bot by Police and By Prosecutors (Lying) Let’s be honest. Cops lie all the time. The reason being that they are not allowed to err. The reason cops must fear error is that we expect too much from human beings who are too often too vulnerable, operating under stress, and having to make snap judgements, using training that accelerates violence rather than de-escalates. 3) Training and Trust The failure to train citizens of all ages to submit to arrest (big, big, big problem) and trust the system. The only remedy to this problem is to reduce the stress of the suspect such that he is somehow rewarded for complicity and somehow punished for resistance. This whole ‘throw people to the ground’ has gotten out of hand. So the problem is we no longer reward people for telling the truth, and no longer reward people for not resisting arrest. And we no longer take the deescalation time such that they will tell the truth and resist arrest, and we do so because officers are too vulnerable acting in small numbers. 4) The Production of Police vs Citizen Stress and Anger: The law is also no longer limited to simple rules that reinforce natural law, but put citizens and officers in conditions of opposition, and misunderstanding. The truth is that legislative law is incomprehensible, where as reciprocity (natural law) is both intuitive and comprehensible – and is largely how our courts adjudicate offenses. Most law just empowers the officers and prosecutors to intervene, whereas most adjudication simply looks into reciprocity (rights). 5) The Production of Social and Political Stress and Anger: Why? Our current laws cause conflcit because they do not allow us to act in our interests in defense of our lives, family, property, status, honor, reputation, and family roles – much less our businesses, and even less our norms traditions, laws, and institutions. This change began with the civil war and continues for the same reasons: voluntary disassociation and defense of social as well as personal investment is necessary if for no other reason that the combination of proximity and inequality damages both groups which rely on signaling for happiness , friendship, mating, family preservation, and economic and political order. Aug 06, 2018 6:28pm

  • ON THE MATTER OF AMERICAN POLICE There are a number of serious problems with cur

    ON THE MATTER OF AMERICAN POLICE

    There are a number of serious problems with current legislation:

    1) The production of stress and vulnerability:

    The use of single officers in patrol cars, rather than pairs or more of officers of different ranks patrolling together. The consequence is more violence because officers are under greater stress, because they are under greater risk. If you travel the world the idea of a single police officer is …. ridiculous.

    Partly because of this our officers are taught significantly more about restraining individuals quickly and harshly, and using weapons aggressively, whereas in the rest of the world they are taught to use numbers and time to de-escalate, and not manhandle the citizenry – which creates the resentment. Just the fact of having six to ten men around you when you’re afraid and angry tends to reduce resentment.

    2) Escalation of Charges bot by Police and By Prosecutors (Lying)

    Let’s be honest. Cops lie all the time. The reason being that they are not allowed to err. The reason cops must fear error is that we expect too much from human beings who are too often too vulnerable, operating under stress, and having to make snap judgements, using training that accelerates violence rather than de-escalates.

    3) Training and Trust

    The failure to train citizens of all ages to submit to arrest (big, big, big problem) and trust the system. The only remedy to this problem is to reduce the stress of the suspect such that he is somehow rewarded for complicity and somehow punished for resistance. This whole ‘throw people to the ground’ has gotten out of hand. So the problem is we no longer reward people for telling the truth, and no longer reward people for not resisting arrest. And we no longer take the deescalation time such that they will tell the truth and resist arrest, and we do so because officers are too vulnerable acting in small numbers.

    4) The Production of Police vs Citizen Stress and Anger:

    The law is also no longer limited to simple rules that reinforce natural law, but put citizens and officers in conditions of opposition, and misunderstanding. The truth is that legislative law is incomprehensible, where as reciprocity (natural law) is both intuitive and comprehensible – and is largely how our courts adjudicate offenses. Most law just empowers the officers and prosecutors to intervene, whereas most adjudication simply looks into reciprocity (rights).

    5) The Production of Social and Political Stress and Anger:

    Why? Our current laws cause conflcit because they do not allow us to act in our interests in defense of our lives, family, property, status, honor, reputation, and family roles – much less our businesses, and even less our norms traditions, laws, and institutions. This change began with the civil war and continues for the same reasons: voluntary disassociation and defense of social as well as personal investment is necessary if for no other reason that the combination of proximity and inequality damages both groups which rely on signaling for happiness , friendship, mating, family preservation, and economic and political order.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-06 18:28:00 UTC

  • THERE CAN BE NO HYPOCRISY IN POSTMODERNISM by Austyn Pember There is no hypocris

    THERE CAN BE NO HYPOCRISY IN POSTMODERNISM

    by Austyn Pember

    There is no hypocrisy – only strategies of deceit for self-interest:

    – The left is not hypocritical. They set up or use your moral framework as a tool against you. Whatever moral justification they are using to have their interests met is just a practical strategy of achieving said interests. they do not believe in truth, reciprocity, principle, reason, or science – only power.

    – When they say “you are a racist,” they are using your moral guilt about that principle against you. They don’t actually adhere to the premise that ‘racism is bad’. It’s only that they don’t want yourself or your demographic resisting against the thing they are championing or demographic they are aligning themselves with – they do not believe in truth, reciprocity, principle, reason, or science – only power.

    This can be shown when they are perfectly fine with ‘racism’ against whites, like the latest NYT editor.

    ALL VIOLATION OF RECIPROCITY VIOLATES NATURAL LAW – AND ALL VIOLATION OF NATURAL LAW GRANTS LICENSE AND AUTHORITY FOR THE USE OF EXTRA-LEGAL ACTION.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-06 08:54:00 UTC

  • “You have no right…”— Rights are determined by men with guns, swords, and sp

    —“You have no right…”—

    Rights are determined by men with guns, swords, and spears. In then absence of reciprocity men have no incentive to produce rights – they have the opposite incentive.

    “Might makes rights.”

    That’s just a truism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-06 08:50:00 UTC

  • The police just know that white folk don’t create trouble and violence, only ant

    The police just know that white folk don’t create trouble and violence, only antifa, blm, and the radical left do. Antifa always starts the violence. Always. That’s what they do.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 23:29:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025886553065881600

    Reply addressees: @lorenajw_x

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025885046140428288


    IN REPLY TO:

    @lorenajw_x

    Showing up to protest Nazis is important. Showing up to support your community is even more important. Find the marginalized folks running for office and support them. Stand up to white people being racist assholes in public. Resist gentrification (that’s you, Portland).

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025885046140428288

  • The Final Word on Oaths, Christianity in Particular, and Religion in General

      Rituals that accompany oaths do not require belief in the ritual, only promise to adhere to the oath lest one be punished for violation of that which the community demands is inviolate (sacred) and therefore unforgivable. The Construction of Religion: Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast (Festival). Political religion (for governing) in addition requires dogma and ‘law’. European pagan religion divided the law (real) from the mythic (ideal), from the cult (supernatural). It was the monotheists who sought a political religion by which to rule others that created a monopoly political dogma, from what had been a market of myths and rituals. ATHEISM The problem with atheism is that while there are dedicated atheists – often people of questionable character, some of us are atheists in that we practice Christanity as a wisdom literature, and many are agnostics in that they go along without knowing one way or the other, and the vast majority only deists who go along because they believe it’s a familial good, – all of us would still (and do) claim we are Christians. And it is why Evangelicals have used that term to distinguish themselves from the rest of us: they practice faith not reason. All that is required to claim one is a Christian is to have adopted the teachings of Christianity: 1. A Respect for private property and that no law may precede private property (the ten commandments) because private property creates harmony. 2. The eradication of hatred from the human heart. 3. The extension of kinship love to non-kin. 4. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war, 5. The commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need. Now, ‘believers’ seem to think that the dogma has some basis in reality, but this is simply untrue (unscientific). The purpose of the dogma was to train illiterate unskilled slaves, peasants, and subsistence farmers in those four principles. The reason for the success of this dogma is that it creates an addiction response in believers for reasons we understand very clearly now. However, many of us do not need cerebral chemistry addiction to follow those five rules. And we understand the value of ritual (the combination of lesson, oath, feast of the church ritual) regardless of how greatly its demand for obedience differs from the five principles of Christianity. Western civilization has always been poly disciplinary and polytheistic. Those of us from germanic northern European families were just as familiar with the pagan myths and fairy tales, if not far more so than those of the ‘alien’ semitic religion. The Germanicization of Christianity was nearly immediate, and the origins in judaism, and non-european Byzantium was quickly and forcibly adapted to european (germanic and latin ) civilization, just as was the orthodox in the slavic lands. Today a person of minimal learning can undrestand quite easily that community rituals and oaths and feasts are necessary for the construction of civic trust. That aspirational myths are somewhat necessary for the intergenerational preservation of group evolutionary and competitive strategy through imitation. And that the mythos of western civilization is merely our history from the ancient greco-roman, germanic continental, and Atlantic periods. The reason we can worship our ancestors and use our history as mythos is because we have ancestors and history worth remembering. Those people who need falsehoods and fictions do so because they have either few or no ancestors or achievements worth remembering. A PAGAN I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and; 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and; 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. AN ARYAN I am an Aryan if: 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. A WARRIOR I am a warrior in that: 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A SON OF ERUOPA Sovereign. A Man Transcendent. When you say we need a ‘complete religion’ we have one. This and the natural law of sovereignty. And the history of the european peoples.

  • I thought it was Antifa that was doing all the damage…. I mean, it’s antifa th

    I thought it was Antifa that was doing all the damage…. I mean, it’s antifa that’s aggressive and hostile.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 19:30:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025826427130847232

    Reply addressees: @johnpavlovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025825892420018177


    IN REPLY TO:

    @johnpavlovitz

    @curtdoolittle Emboldened racists with weapons do damage to people.

    My name and face aren’t hidden.
    I can own my words and actions.
    I’m not afraid of them.
    I just recognize them for what they are.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025825892420018177